Misrepresenting what I said... strawman
lol.
It was a valid response to YOUR analogy.
I don't really care where you go with it, lol.
Kate Middleton hospital nurse who answered Aussie crank call found dead
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
lol.
I don't really care where you go with it, lol.
It doesnt sound like it concrned the royal family overly, and yes its first world problems. The third world doesnt have shock jocks pulling these stunts.
It was already in the public domain.
I guess if the 'victims' don't care...
I miss Jesse and Jean. They pulled this great stunt where they called the space station, pretending to be Jean Chretien. They asked all sorts of ridiculous questions.
Had me in stitches. If I remember correctly, I think I peed a little.
They got fired too.
T|t for tat. I was just getting revenge.
(?)
According to you.
Dodge, parry, circle, etc.
That she was in the horsespttle in the first place. Her condition at the time wasn't.
Umm ya, OK, lol.T|t for tat. I was just getting revenge.
I thought you didn't want to side track, lol.
Nope, according to the facts...
Nope, just responding accordingly.Dodge, parry, circle, etc.
Seriously, it was just a question, not a statement, therefore not a strawman on my part..
See? Your sidetracking worked on me.
Wanna reread the OP again? Here, I'll even fetch it for ya:
"The DJs, posing as Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles, called the King Edward VII Hospital to inquire about Kate's condition and were patched through to a nurse, who revealed private health details about the duchess. " Doesn't look like the specifics of her condition at the time were public domain to me.
The only way you can respond, to be exact. lol
Nope.
The official royal statement released on the 3rd listed Hyperemesis Gravidarum as to the reason for admission.
The DJ's didn't make their call until 4th.
Nope, I was referring to your analogy. The DJ's never saw or possessed any confidential files.
That's just silly make believe on your account.
Exactly what I said. Her condition at the time wasn't public domain until the DJs prank. That she was in the hospital for her ailment was public domain.
Again - ""The DJs, posing as Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles, called the King Edward VII Hospital to inquire about Kate's condition and were patched through to a nurse, who revealed private health details about the duchess. "" That means that they didn't know what her condition was. All they knew was her affliction.
Yeah, that's the strawman part; I remember.
Right, just some private info; " a nurse, who revealed private health details about the duchess"
riiiiiiiiiiiiiight
No it isn't, lol.
In the real world the 3rd comes before the 4th.
Nothing was revealed that wasn't public knowledge on the 3rd...
Hyperemesis gravidarum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Loss of 5% or more of pre-pregnancy body weight
- Dehydration, causing ketosis, and constipation
- Nutrition disorders
- Metabolic imbalances
- Physical and emotional stress of pregnancy on the body
- Difficulty with activities of daily living
Nothing there was new on the 4th, lol.
It's still your poor analogy.
You should agree, my observation is correct.
Dream on. Her condition had likely changed between the 3rd and the 4th. People do get better, you know.
Either way what those 2 did was quite unethical.
Those are the facts. The only dreams are in your posts. Hence the poor analogies and conjecture.
Conjecture.
So?
In your opinion. *shrugs*
So?
Um, so it ain't right. Jeeez, didn't think I'd have to spell it out for you.
BTW ad hominems are logical fallacies, too.
That's why there aren't any in my posts.
Conjecture.
I doubt they thought about the consequences at all.
LOL, that's the dumbest statement made in this thread.
Well, your interpretation of the facts anyway ....
Yeah, that's not ad hominem and is relevant to the topic.
Nope, under logical scrutiny, the facts are what they are.
The 3rd comes before the 4th. The DJ's never possessed any confidential files. They were never told anything that wasn't already public knowledge. I merely addressed you poor analogy. And there were no ad hominems or strawman fallacies in my posts.
You're right, it isn't.
Hey LG... isn't CB nasty and annoying.
You proved your points two pages ago. Now CB is just baiting you and trying to bury your arguments under pages of flames.
So how do you make this a better forum CB? What exactly do you add?.
You proved your points two pages ago. Now CB is just baiting you and trying to bury your arguments under pages of flames.
So how do you make this a better forum CB? What exactly do you add?.