Insite Given Exemption By SCoC

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
The Vancouver Coast Health Authority which runs Insite, stated long ago that if they got a favorable decision from the Supreme Court that they would next push for "safe inhalation rooms" for crack addicts. What's next? Supervised meth production labs because its "a dangerous activity that people are going to do anyway, so we might as well supervise it.".

Liberalism destroys nations.

Perhaps we should just shoot them - Long term addicts - no hope of coming off drugs - drain on Health care budgets -
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
44
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
jailing someone for being sick costs a lot more than trying to deal with it at the ground level.

Not true if you factor in the extensive PROPERTY CRIME junkies commit to supply their habit, plus the tremendous POLICING COST of the Downtown Eastside.

The cheapest option is to ENFORCE THE LAW and lock these people up. Not only would it be the cheapest option but normal people would be able to walk the Downtown Eastside without having to worry about being mugged, without having to watch their step for needles, blood, urine, feces, and vomit. The junkies in the Downtown Eastside also throw so much garbage on the sidewalk that cleaner streets in itself would be worth removing junkies from the public.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Not true if you factor in the extensive PROPERTY CRIME junkies commit to supply their habit, plus the tremendous POLICING COST of the Downtown Eastside.

The cheapest option is to ENFORCE THE LAW and lock these people up. Not only would it be the cheapest option but normal people would be able to walk the Downtown Eastside without having to worry about being mugged, without having to watch their step for needles, blood, urine, feces, and vomit. The junkies in the Downtown Eastside also throw so much garbage on the sidewalk that cleaner streets in itself would be worth removing junkies from the public.

That would mean lots more prisons - and then all the health care needed to provide proper care - Yes the public would like the idea until they saw the cost for it.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
It is the individual addict that is obstructing their own rights "to life, liberty and security of the person"... Doesn't that factor into the equation?

yeah it does, exactly the same as we factor it in when someone attempts to commit suicide, or harm themselves. They deserve medical care.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Not true if you factor in the extensive PROPERTY CRIME junkies commit to supply their habit, plus the tremendous POLICING COST of the Downtown Eastside.

The cheapest option is to ENFORCE THE LAW and lock these people up. Not only would it be the cheapest option but normal people would be able to walk the Downtown Eastside without having to worry about being mugged, without having to watch their step for needles, blood, urine, feces, and vomit. The junkies in the Downtown Eastside also throw so much garbage on the sidewalk that cleaner streets in itself would be worth removing junkies from the public.

It won't change if we keep the status quo alley. Insite offers some hope of stability, safety. From there recovery is a possibility.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Not true if you factor in the extensive PROPERTY CRIME junkies commit to supply their habit, plus the tremendous POLICING COST of the Downtown Eastside.

The cheapest option is to ENFORCE THE LAW and lock these people up. Not only would it be the cheapest option but normal people would be able to walk the Downtown Eastside without having to worry about being mugged, without having to watch their step for needles, blood, urine, feces, and vomit. The junkies in the Downtown Eastside also throw so much garbage on the sidewalk that cleaner streets in itself would be worth removing junkies from the public.

Is the scenario on the street you describe, typical of junkies or more the extreme? I'm a little puzzled at how this attitude coincides with your Christian beliefs. I'd like to find the cause and then I think a cure is attainable. If we "throw away" these people who will be next? The epileptics, the lepers, the mongoloids, people with a hare lip?

It won't change if we keep the status quo alley. Insite offers some hope of stability, safety. From there recovery is a possibility.

I sure hope so Karrie. :smile:
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
44
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
It won't change if we keep the status quo alley. Insite offers some hope of stability, safety. From there recovery is a possibility.

It's Insite that's perpetuating the status quo! It's not truly helping them because all they're doing is supervising the injection and offering a pamphlet :roll: on how to get treatment. They may stop an overdose today only to have that same person die tomorrow!

Have you seen these people in the Downtown Eastside? They're the walking dead and they love their drugs more than life itself. Their only hope is to be forcibly removed from the drug scene environment.

And if you still think Insite is valuable, what do you have say about the girl who went to Insite because she wanted to try heroin for the FIRST TIME? Surprise! No one at Insite warned her about her grave decision, let alone try to stop her and instead COACHED her on how to properly inject herself! She got addicted and had to seek help in a program that had nothing to do with Insite! Does that sound like giving someone hope and stability? No.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I'm not sure that addiction in itself is a crime. So if they steal something do they deserve a longer sentence than the non addict who steals something? What would locking an addict up teach him? Besides if you start locking up addicts, we could lose doctors, mayors, chartered accountants, blacksmiths, plumbers etc. It could be a very slippery slope.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Have you seen these people in the Downtown Eastside? They're the walking dead and they love their drugs more than life itself. Their only hope is to be forcibly removed from the drug scene environment.

Have I ever been? No. I've only ever been to Van once, on my honeymoon. Touristy, non gritty type stuff.

Have I ever had to deal with addicts? yes. Am I aware that it is virtually impossible under Canadian law to force a person into treatment or move them anywhere they don't want to be moved? yes. We've been to court to try to have someone institutionalized as their organs gave out from their addiction. It's impossible under the law. Current choices are try to keep them alive and get them help, put up with them injecting in parks and leaving needles around, or incarcerate the lot of them (and that's not a real choice as no one wants to foot the bill).

Are there going to be horror stories? hell yes. But guess what, the horror stories won't go away with Insite disappearing.
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
44
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
Is the scenario on the street you describe, typical of junkies or more the extreme?

Walk the Downtown Eastside and find out for yourself!

I'm a little puzzled at how this attitude coincides with your Christian beliefs.

Where are you more likely to hear the gospel? Prison or some Liberal leaning "safe injection site"?

If we "throw away" these people who will be next? The epileptics, the lepers, the mongoloids, people with a hare lip?

None of these people made a conscious choice to destroy their lives - junkies did.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
It's Insite that's perpetuating the status quo! It's not truly helping them because all they're doing is supervising the injection and offering a pamphlet :roll: on how to get treatment. They may stop an overdose today only to have that same person die tomorrow!

Have you seen these people in the Downtown Eastside? They're the walking dead and they love their drugs more than life itself. Their only hope is to be forcibly removed from the drug scene environment.

And if you still think Insite is valuable, what do you have say about the girl who went to Insite because she wanted to try heroin for the FIRST TIME? Surprise! No one at Insite warned her about her grave decision, let alone try to stop her and instead COACHED her on how to properly inject herself! She got addicted and had to seek help in a program that had nothing to do with Insite! Does that sound like giving someone hope and stability? No.

Their main hope is when the powers that be get the balls to shoot/hang the traffickers and importers. Kill the source of the problem, or at least one of the sources. Some people are by nature self destructive so you can't save all of them as some will find another addiction...............booze, gambling etc.

Walk the Downtown Eastside and find out for yourself!



.

The ones you see who are filthy and lying in the gutter are not your typical drug addicts.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
None of these people made a conscious choice to destroy their lives - junkies did.

Not every junkie is a junkie by choice or personal action. Forcibly injecting socially vulnerable women and getting them hooked is one of the many tactics used to draw women into prostituion. Others turn to street drugs when their doctor prescribed opiate addiction for their bad back gets out of hand and docs stop prescribing to them, turn them away cold turkey. They're already an addict, their life was already destroyed. It may come as a surprise to you, but perfectly normal, valuable, people succumb to addictions every day.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Why is this still being debated?

It has been scientifically proven to be beneficial, for health and public safety.

The SCC has ruled that Insite will be exempt, simply because it makes sense.