And then we have the time spent by the family unit to work thru this as a family.
And pampering by parents is not just for people with ADD/ADHD.
and there is a major difference between these 2 statements.
And then we have the time spent by the family unit to work thru this as a family.
And pampering by parents is not just for people with ADD/ADHD.
And pampering by parents is not just for people with ADD/ADHD.
Yes they did, and they are doing quite well for themselves now. Unlike some others I know who were "pampered" and "excused" for their behaviour.
Hm I have a problem with shifting this solely to HR especially if there is a union involved.What I am saying is people at times snap- there may be a reason for this, not an excuse, but a mitigating factor.
As Karrie mentions an HR issue, but possible that HR brushed it off. I have seen that on occasion.
Every prov in Canada is cutting positions in Hospitals.
Just broadening the conversation to what is not reported.
Bump- Needed clarification- Apologize for my haste.And then we have the time spent by the family unit to work thru this as a family.
And pampering by parents is not just done by parents of children with ADD/ADHD. Some parents make pampering an integral part of raising a child.
I know nothing about these illnesses.
Hm I have a problem with shifting this solely to HR especially if there is a union involved.
To do so, one would have to prove said employee has displayed unstable behaviour in the past. That it has been documented. That his supervisor has spoken to him about it and that he has signed off on it. That he was aware further behavior would result in dismissal. Regardless he still needs to be off the job no?
Yes. But, typically speaking in Canada, hurt feelings when a person acts outside the policies of the business or institution, does not mean you can sue. Contrary to what tv tells us, lawsuits aren't that simple.
Best you check a little closer on the HRC.s in Canada.
typical quebecois elitist prick.
Yet you still argue in another thread that we shouldn't let them separate. :roll:
and what do I say they should do?
You think they should leave and find another land-mass to live on. Well guess what, same goes for the natives that want to be separate from Canada. Me, I'm just as happy to split the land at the Ontario/Manitoba border and all the french and all the indians can have the east while us in the west can stop paying billions and billions to support both freeloading groups.
Big difference, the Natives were never defeated in war, they have never given up their sovereignty. The French did both at the Plains of Abraham and after.
They were given a chance to quit before they were slaughtered. They want to fight about sovereignty in what is now our country we can finish the job. Otherwise, to use your words, suck it up buttercup!!!!
You must get really pi ssed off with out laws and the Supreme Court, because they all disagree with you.