Cons want RCMP to investigate abortions
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
So not only do you want to impose your religious beliefs on every other person in this free country but you want to jail anyone who doesn't follow your beliefs. :roll:
Do you have any idea how much of a religious wing-nut that makes you.
So?
So you think there should be an investigation?
When lives are concerned, likely really shouldn't be in the measure.
His answer (which is predictable) should be OK with you, you have the same belief in forcing your beliefs on everyone else, lol.
Conjecture.
Yes, yes we have.
Unfettered, unrestricted slaughter of life.
Who knew you two had something in common.
You don't have to be religious to be a wing nut trying to force their beliefs on others.
I doubt he does.
The purpose of the investigation is simply to find out in which of those late term abortions did the baby come out alive and a doctor or nurse finished the job on a live birth....period!
Those arguing against that are simply ideologues looking for a cause. and trying to move the goal posts....
Those arguing against that are simply ideologues looking for a cause. and trying to move the goal posts....
Other way around. Those pushing for an investigation are on a mission with zero evidence. Basically they are on a fishing trip with the goal of removing women's rights to terminate a pregnancy.
What a lovely debate, some people saying, "Killing a person is murder," and other people saying "These investigations are politically motivated."
Yes. Crushing the head of a breathing infant is murder. Nobody disagrees with that. Some might call it mercy, but the law of the land does not allow that.
Yes. The police should investigate murders. Nobody disagrees with that.
What evidence do they have that these abortions were murders? None, they are trying to get the RCMP to go on a fishing expedition. Anytime someone dies in a hospital, it could have been euthanasia, which would make it murder. Should there be an investigation? No. That is just inconsiderate overreach by the police. The correct investigation to take place in hospitals where there is no a priori evidence of wrongdoing is for the certification bodies to inspect the practice, not for the RCMP to go and make a mess of things. Imagine the tragedy that would occur in every family if the RCMP got involved every time grandpa or grandma died.
They have no such evidence of wrongdoing: the MPs have asked for a fishing expedition in the hopes of finding something to fuel their agenda in the abortion debate which is otherwise settled.
Yes. Crushing the head of a breathing infant is murder. Nobody disagrees with that. Some might call it mercy, but the law of the land does not allow that.
Yes. The police should investigate murders. Nobody disagrees with that.
What evidence do they have that these abortions were murders? None, they are trying to get the RCMP to go on a fishing expedition. Anytime someone dies in a hospital, it could have been euthanasia, which would make it murder. Should there be an investigation? No. That is just inconsiderate overreach by the police. The correct investigation to take place in hospitals where there is no a priori evidence of wrongdoing is for the certification bodies to inspect the practice, not for the RCMP to go and make a mess of things. Imagine the tragedy that would occur in every family if the RCMP got involved every time grandpa or grandma died.
They have no such evidence of wrongdoing: the MPs have asked for a fishing expedition in the hopes of finding something to fuel their agenda in the abortion debate which is otherwise settled.
If you claim you are Pro-Life - but at what cost to society and the future of this planet? I challenge you to watch this video.
This video is in a series from Chris Martenson, a biochemical scientist who explores our ever-changing world and the future of it.
Crash Course Chapter 18: Environmental Data | Peak Prosperity
This video is in a series from Chris Martenson, a biochemical scientist who explores our ever-changing world and the future of it.
Crash Course Chapter 18: Environmental Data | Peak Prosperity
You couldn't fix a fuk in a *****house. All you can do is parrot the church dogma. Why is it that men think they should control what women do with their bodies?
I guess that is the reason behind this whole quandary that will never come to a concensus. It has a lot to do with what is more important, the container or the contents!
Why not pull all HIV and Hep C cases and see who was an IV user then bust them for drugs. There is a possibility they were dealing.
Last edited:
I don't see it that way. Give them equal importance. Should the container be prohibited from emptying the contents simply because the contents cannot develop otherwise?
Moving away from this analogy, give equal importance to men, women and embryos. Should a family be prohibited from having a child via in vitro fertilization because it will result in some embryos which will never develop into children?
The fact that we cannot make an embryo viable outside of the mother is a tragedy because of our lack of technology to transplant the embryo or otherwise develop it. The impotence of our technology should not be the defining characteristic of the ability of the woman to choose what is inside of her body.
How can one be pro life but against IVF? How can one declare that the destruction of embryos from abortion is murder but the destruction of embryos from IVF is not? It is a tragedy of our technical impotence, in the same way that it is a tragedy when a patient dies in surgery: there is nothing that we can do for them.
Investigate all the bona fide complaints if there are any.
Have any medical staff or patients who are the only ones with knowledge of possible crimes came forward with any complaints of wrong doing that merit investigation?
If yes, go nuts on those cases only.
If no, go to Hell.
If we let them go after the witches, you realize that the gnomes, faeries, elves, angels, leprechauns, demons, sprites, chupacabras and eskimos are next.
Last edited: