Living in the forest or jungle leaves one open to predator attacks to be eaten cities are safer
Anti-Petroleum movement a security risk to canada
- Thread starter AyameTaylor
- Start date
How many people die of cancer, heart disease, crime, police brutality, motor vehicle accidents, respiratory disease and other pollution related illnesses every year in your city. The city is full of human predators. You are not safer in a city. That is a fallacy perpetrated by your slave masters to keep you in their urban concentration camps.
After we totally destroy this place earth will move on to the next phase. Like after the massive fire burns down the whole forest Let it go Cliffy. Just enjoy you're time here while you are alive.
Instead of waisting you're time trying to change things that are out of you're control
Instead of waisting you're time trying to change things that are out of you're control
That is another fallacy. The biggest danger in the forest or jungle is the corporate rape and pillage of of the environment. Mining and logging industries in third world countries are the worst violators of human rights and Canadian companies are the worst. All for the sake of our lifestyle. The exploitation and murder of indigenous peoples is what allows us to have such decadence.
I'm not a nihilist like you. Perhaps humans will go the way of the dinosaurs. I don't care. Life will still go on without us. I am more concerned with all the other life forms that we are killing off. As a species we have become a cancer to the planet but I also see a lot of people waking up and standing up. There is hope but only for those who choose to stop being the problem.
Only the strong life will remain , and so nature will continue without the weak life without us like it has for eternity.
We are only a natural phenomenon of nature stop thinking you're more importent then that.
Even if the world price of oil recovers we would have to keep ours low, to punish Russia.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) [FONT="]–[/FONT] New sanctions by Canada against Russia are an attempt to undermine the Minsk agreements and hamper normal bilateral relations between Moscow and Ottawa, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said Wednesday. "The decision by the Canadian authorities on the further expansion of sanctions against official Russian figures and companies under the guise of the events in Ukraine look like a clumsy attempt to hamper the fulfilment of the agreements on settling the conflict reached in Minsk on February 12 with the active and constructive role of Russia," Lukashevich said in a statement published on the ministry's website.
Earlier on Wednesday, Canada imposed sanctions against 37 individuals and 17 companies from Russia and Ukraine.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) [FONT="]–[/FONT] New sanctions by Canada against Russia are an attempt to undermine the Minsk agreements and hamper normal bilateral relations between Moscow and Ottawa, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said Wednesday. "The decision by the Canadian authorities on the further expansion of sanctions against official Russian figures and companies under the guise of the events in Ukraine look like a clumsy attempt to hamper the fulfilment of the agreements on settling the conflict reached in Minsk on February 12 with the active and constructive role of Russia," Lukashevich said in a statement published on the ministry's website.
Earlier on Wednesday, Canada imposed sanctions against 37 individuals and 17 companies from Russia and Ukraine.
a thinking person realizes that there is, quite obviously, no way to completely divest ourselves from petroleum. A thinking person realizes that there is a problem in the current extent of the burning of fossil-fuels, one amplified by future intended expansion. A thinking person realizes that, yes, there is something that can be done. A thinking person realizes that an extended "timeline roadmap" approach towards improved efficiencies, reduced dependency on fossil-fuels and an increased emphasis on alternative energy sources is the societal way forward. A thinking person in this regard is not a Harper Conservative declared, "enemy of the state". Are you really... not a thinking person?
All things we already are doing.
But even all of that will only slow the inevitable.
That it takes 4000 years to consume this planet, or that it takes 10000 years to consume this planet.
Fact remains. We will consume this planet reguardless of how many man hours is needed to consume it.
your reply is suggestive that you're quite accepting to initiatives toward, "improved efficiencies, reduced dependencies on fossil-fuels and increased reliance on alternative energies". That's right then, yes? If so, then it would seem your expressed concern lies more in your perceived interpretation in the degree of the change/shift of initiatives you appear to already accept... is that right... that your concern is simply a matter of the degrees of shift/change?
on edit: I read you have subsequently edited your post to add the following qualification:
is your bow to, "the inevitable"... one that aligns with a concern that no amount of shift/change in "increased efficiencies, reduced fossil-fuel dependencies and increased alternative-energy deployments", can have an impact, can make a difference?
Last edited: