Computers malfunction, that by itself would pay for the pilots just via insurance reductions by having them act as the best safety backup.
Look it up for yourself, this is the file name you are looking for. It is 200K in size and it is only for the door, the 22mg file has all the flight data that you need to recreate the whole flight.
FLIGHT_DECK_DOOR_GMT.csv door closed @ 12:19:07 GMT That is what a functioning readout would say.
In it most basic form the auto pilot stays on the same course and speed, or does it make scheduled turns as well? Isn't there also a computer controlled landing option for stormy weather?
Computers malfunction, that by itself would pay for the pilots just via insurance reductions by having them act as the best safety backup.
I recall the pdf file, it was page 13 that gave the abbreviation for finding the FLT DOOR info. It was page 10 that said the data was unconfirmed. It was a freedom of info request that resulted in those two cvs files becoming available. The active parameters are in the cvs files, the PDF file only tells you what sort of data can be accessed. The door data is an optional data set that was monitored by the FDR in Flight 77.I did and even posted where the exact place where you can see it wasnt working,your evidence is contradicting your statements and you posted it so maybe read the whole thing before quote mining it.
This is what you are baseing your claims on and it says your wrong.Read back,I posted where to find it on the evidence YOU posted.
Now if you claim this data as gospel then why leave out that part?
This is in fact on the same data you are basing your argument that the door wasnt opened.This is YOUR evidence or what your basing your claims on.
So which is it?
Go back a few posts and you will see where I gave you the exact paragraphs to see that.
Your losing ground here fast after getting caught.
Do I have to repost it like all the other info you ignore?
You should really read the whole thing before useing it as a reference,your not doing yourself any favours here.
I told you I will catch you if your quote mining and this is a few times now that I have.
Parameters Not Working Or Unconfirmed
"Accident investigators monitor the cockpit door with the FDR because it may yield clues to pilot error in a crash. The FDR begins recording once the pilots are in their seats and readying for takeoff, and the plane cannot take off unless the FDR is working."
Still if a really busy airport can land and takeoff aircraft by computer that might keep them at maximum production. One missed landing (pilot error) could back up a lot of flights in a place like NY,NY. I'm sure the navigator is quite happy to punch in a few numbers and watch lights and listen for horns for the rest of the flight rather than taking his own sun-shots.Hmmm... Pilots are supposed to fly airplanes, computers are supposed to help them do that, not the other way around. It is now to the point where pilots are so busy dotting i's, crossing t's ensuring no rules are being bent, programming flight management systems, there is too little time left for the important stuff. It is a result of trying to stuff too much aluminum into a finite amount of airspace so people can take advantage of those $49 YOW-EWR fares, or whatever.
They do.;-) Where ya been the last ten years?Still if a really busy airport can land and takeoff aircraft by computer that might keep them at maximum production..
The 'conspiracy theory' would be the false version.
How does it get determined which version is true and which is false?
Is it like musical chairs, a new 'crime' happens and the first one to say 'conspiracy while point the finger' is the winner in the battle the truth?
If you called an elephant's trunk a leg how many legs would an elephant have?
The 'conspiracy theory' would be the false version.
How does it get determined which version is true and which is false?
Is it like musical chairs, a new 'crime' happens and the first one to say 'conspiracy while point the finger' is the winner in the battle the truth?
4 calling a trunk a leg doesn't make it one.Dunno.... I'm blind and can only touch one part.
Are you sure you're not over simplifying the situation?The theories supporting conspiracy would be portrayed as the false narratives by the ruling pathocracy. Similarly the conspiracies entertained by that same ruling pathocracy would be supported by "scientific consensus". Consensus routinely is not a result of science but far more often a product of hierarchical policy. see National Socialist paradigm or Neo-Liberal Globalism
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY 173 Macrosocial Phenomena When a ponerogenic process encompasses a society’s entire ruling class, or nation, or when opposition from normal people is stifled -- as a result of the mass character of the phenomenon, or by using spellbinding means and physical compulsion, in-cluding censorship -- we are dealing with a macrosocial pone-rologic phenomenon.
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY 175
The traditional interpretation of these great historical dis-eases has already taught historians to distinguish two phases. The first is represented by a period of spiritual crisis in a soci-ety,86 which historiography associates with exhausting of the ideational, moral, and religious values heretofore nourishing the society in question. Egoism among individuals and social groups increases, and the links of moral duty and social net-works are felt to be loosening. Trifling matters thereupon dominate human minds to such an extent that there is no room left for thinking about public matters or a feeling of commit-ment to the future. An atrophy of the hierarchy of values within the thinking of individuals and societies is an indication thereof; it has been described both in historiographic mono-graphs and in psychiatric papers. The country’s government is finally paralyzed, helpless in the face of problems which could be solved without great difficulty under other circumstances. Let us associate such periods of crisis with the familiar phase in social hysterization. The next phase has been marked by bloody tragedies, revo-lutions, wars, and the fall of empires.
They are tossing the idea of remote assistance, though. I read something about it yesterday and I should've copied the link.The easiest way to fly an airplane remotely is through the autopilot, (unless it is specifically built for remote flight, like a drone). The servos, hardware, and software are already in place. But there is no way to discreetly or covertly do this in a commercial aircraft, and trust me, airlines would do it and have computer hacks on the ground flying you to sunny spots in the south with no one on board controlling the airplane. It would certainly be cheaper, but I would think most folks like the fact that someone in control has just as much interest, (and as much to lose) in a safe flight as you do. We haven't gotten there yet, and hopefully never will.