According to you and Durka, anyone who disagrees with you has a ''skewed'' view of things. Followers of Stalin and Hitler also thought that way.;-)
According to you and Durka, anyone who disagrees with you has a ''skewed'' view of things. Followers of Stalin and Hitler also thought that way.;-)
Well everyone else has seen it... but you never will. You just won't. Because if you do open your eyes and see what everyone else sees... the North Tower smashing into WTC 7... well then you can no longer believe what you want to believe.
It seems quite possible that the damage done to WTC 7 is on the side you can't see, since it's facing away from us, and toward the fallen tower.
Anyhow why would all those firemen lie about seeing the damage? or were they holograms too?
On the other side we don't see, there is absolutly nothing at all.
From my point of view, it is something else that has been damage during the collapse, and it is called your brains.
see... the side we don't see... we don't see.... so how can you say there's nothing there?
From the context of these conversations I gather there are no photographs of the damage done to WTC7, BUT we have heard many eyewitness accounts of the damage, and had plausible explanations of how the damage occurred.
You haven't said anything about the evidence provided, though...
So guys tell me, how building 7 was smashed by the collapse, you can clearly see, that building 7 was barely touch, so i seriously want to know.......
Just by those photo, you can understand why i say, those who believe in us official story needs a brain check, and it is urgent.
all three of those pictures show WTC 7 from the SAME side. There is a side you cannot see from there.
Also worthy of note is the fact that the pictures are low quality and the building could sustain pretty heavy damage without us being able to see it.
Well everyone else has seen it... but you never will. You just won't. Because if you do open your eyes and see what everyone else sees... the North Tower smashing into WTC 7... well then you can no longer believe what you want to believe.
Thumbs up to ya for sticking to your story! I do have to point out that in Pic 4, that tongue of debris above and headed toward WTC 7 isn't Sideshow Bob. There is some hard stuff in there. If it rent the face of 7 the same as Deutcshe Bank was opened up in the collapse of Tower 2, then 7 was mortally wounded and had to come down. I am familiar with conventional structural steel construction, but tube is alien territory to me.
Wolf
Hello, everyone who support the official story and the us official story are saying wtc 1 smashed into wtc 7, this is not smashing, this is barely touch, and the tongue of debris as you say, is certainly not enough to do heavy damage on a steel frame building, otherwise all building sorrounding both wtc, would have collapsed.
And the side you cant see, there is nothing to worry about, cause wtc 1 wasnt on the side you can't see.Show me a video or photo showing wtc being smashed and heavily damage by wtc 1
tell me where, i really want to know.