What comes to mind when dealing with the theorists is the sign on the old folks home on the "simpsons", Please do not talk about the outside world.
The US official explanation, it is a pancake collapse,which would have taken at the least 45 sec, considering there is resistance beetween each floor.
Controlled demolition doesnt make building falling exactly at free fall speed, it is always very near.Taking into account that both wtc had 110 floor, 15 sec to 20 sec for a controlled demolition just make sense.
The US official explanation, it is a pancake collapse,which would have taken at the least 45 sec, considering there is resistance beetween each floor.
I got news for you, did you watch the video? If you did, you will notice the DEBRIS FALLING AT FREE FALL SPEED, while the building came tumbling after it.
And BTW, where the heck do you come up with 45 sec? YOu make things up as you go along.
See help, I'm serious.
interesting figure. Who made it up?
Have you ever seen 2001 a space odyssey?---according to that documentary there is a giant fetus orbiting the earth. This fetus used to be a Canadian astronaut. He killed a computer, dropped some acid and dove in a worm hole. He did this all without the use of the Canadian space arm. To make a long story short, 911 never happened because the twin towers never existed. I visited new york city in 1997 and noted the remarkable absence of any twin towers. ---My journal from that day is very clear " Towers a lie -twins even more so" --What more evidence does one need?--or do I have to show you that giant fetus myself?
what the hell???
that's a science fiction movie, not a documentary.
Acid was not involved in the movie, and neither was 9/11 or the twin towers.
Possibly you're being sarcastic?
Carefull ---dont anger the giant fetus--He has some mean monkey friends.
But seriously -the monoliths in 2001 foreshadow the twin towers- the overseerers have allowed them to be symbolically destroyed to warn us of the impending visitation of the giant fetus.
that's a science fiction movie, not a documentary.
Acid was not involved in the movie, and neither was 9/11 or the twin towers.
They don't explain why, all they say,
"i understand why people might think that, and i see what they are saying, but when you learned the fact about the way building 7 was built, and about the way it supported itself, and the damage that was done by the collapsing towers, the idea that it was a controlled demolition just holds no water."
This is one of the most pathetic answer i ever heard in my entire life.
Then the narration goes,with the video, showing wtc 1 collapsing """ as the twin towers collapse, debris smashed into wtc7""
However you clearly see no debris at all going to the wtc 7 from the collapse.
The final report on wtc7 , is still being prepared as they say, 5 years of investigation to prove that wtc 7 collapsed ,not demolished.
And no word at all , on Sylverstein, not even a single one.
Have you ever seen 2001 a space odyssey?---according to that documentary there is a giant fetus orbiting the earth. This fetus used to be a Canadian astronaut. He killed a computer, dropped some acid and dove in a worm hole. He did this all without the use of the Canadian space arm. To make a long story short, 911 never happened because the twin towers never existed. I visited new york city in 1997 and noted the remarkable absence of any twin towers. ---My journal from that day is very clear " Towers a lie -twins even more so" --What more evidence does one need?--or do I have to show you that giant fetus myself?
Not only that, but there's absolutely NO mention of Hitler in there at all. It must be a conspiracy.
```However you clearly see no debris at all going to the wtc 7 from the collapse.
```
Not only that, there were several buildings that were closer to the two major towers. They were hit with far more debris and they didn't fall.
That's something the demented Bush apologists can never explain.
```However you clearly see no debris at all going to the wtc 7 from the collapse.
```
Not only that, there were several buildings that were closer to the two major towers. They were hit with far more debris and they didn't fall.
That's something the demented Bush apologists can never explain.
Eagle, I don't see why you even bother replying to Logic's posts anymore. He/She is a lost cause unwilling to listen to anything other then his/hers own skewed view of things.
Gopher, I see you subscribe to the whole "Your with us or against us" doctrine, except you use it to lump people who disagree with your views as "Bush Apologists"