Does this mean the Mexican children will be used to explain the high numbers while the majority are the poor from the US.
Capitalism is a vile, disgusting immoral abomination that needs to be aborted.
Capitalism doesn't help feed children. Wherever did you get such an idea? People feed children, Capitalism doesn't engage in anything that does not show a profit. Which explains why Republicans want to cut back on food stamps, school meal programs, etc. It is against their capitalist puppet masters interests. The richest azzholes in the US, the Koch brothers, want to deregulate anything in the country that helps the poor or gets in the way of maximizing their profits. Capitalism is going to wipe out humanity and most of the other living things on this planet and all the capitalist can think of is money. Well they will get wiped out along with everybody else.Because it helps feed children? :roll:
Look at the character of those who call themselves "Americans." They are a debased and degraded people who have fallen prey to leftist ideology. I have no use for them. My people are the few who still subscribe to the ideas I embrace. My people have no future in a polity called the United States. Thus, for my people to prosper there should be no United States. Using leftist tactics to attack the American Left is like removing the keystone upholding an arch. I wish Obama was more than a symptom. Then, removing his head would remove the problem.I prefer to eat vegetarians, but rightists will do in a pinch. And which of the Republican azzhat puppets would you replace Obama with? Do you really think any of those jerk offs will be any better? Your country and its empire are in terminal decline. Blaming your politicians for your own neglect is just a neglect of your own responsibilities to your country and yourselves. Obama isn't your problem, He is placed there to be your scapegoat by the pricks who really deserve your hatred.
Those who can't work should be cared for. Those who can work must work. Those who won't work should become Canadians.Cons would probably feel a lot better if the government killed off all the non productive "free loaders". It is the mindset of the free market economy capitalists. Here is an alternative view that values every one and living thing:
...
Obama has made the rich wealthier, the poor miserable, and the working class endangered. Leftism and elitism are the same thing.
You forgot single-handily.Obama has made the rich wealthier, the poor miserable, and the working class endangered. Leftism and elitism are the same thing.
Look at the character of those who call themselves "Americans." They are a debased and degraded people who have fallen prey to leftist ideology. I have no use for them. My people are the few who still subscribe to the ideas I embrace. My people have no future in a polity called the United States. Thus, for my people to prosper there should be no United States. Using leftist tactics to attack the American Left is like removing the keystone upholding an arch. I wish Obama was more than a symptom. Then, removing his head would remove the problem.
I'm not interested in empire. I'm not interested in foreign enemies. I'm only focused on the American Left which controls America. Since it is impossible to negotiate or reason with the American Left, it's necessary to poison the entire body politic to loosen the grip of the leftists. Only then can my ideals survive among one of the successor states that follow the end of the United States.
Those who can't work should be cared for. Those who can work must work. Those who won't work should become Canadians.
Obama has made the rich wealthier, the poor miserable, and the working class endangered. Leftism and elitism are the same thing.
Very interesting but the elite manufacture and control the other isms. The most powerful ism is of course elite. If you poison the left you'll be overrun by the right and you'll be off to costco for more warfarin pellets.
The elite of the Right are essentially people who think they can make leftist orthodoxy work effectively from a cost/benefit standpoint. They don't control any of the national institutions except an ineffective Congress.
Neither left nor right represents American workers. The USA should only exist to the extent it serves the interests of American workers. Btw, "workers" includes all people who have to work for a living. In this sense the term includes Marx's working class and the bourgeoisie.
Jekyll and Hyde, each there to protect 'the innocents' from the other. The thinking people need to be in the military if changes are to be long lasting. Military rule doesn't have to mean a roadblock every block. It means there is a car and a truck made, you get to decide which of them you want to own, there is only one model of each for a base price. After that options are as much as you have to spend, black or olive green paint is the only option. New rolling chassis, $1. Gas $5/ltr and AV gas is also sold for more than a little more. Free Enterprise only works if you let the customers decide what direction their interest and their cash goes.The workers have consistantly failed to protect themselves from the thinkers. Unless thinking people are dealt with there's no hope for worker succession.
Puts a whole new light on that 'give us your homeless and poor' ad to the EU, it was so they could become cannon fodder after being given a few bright beads to play with rather than becoming part of the equals to the EU Elite.
You said the "S" word. "Bailiff! Whack his pee pee!"in the other thread that we had on the subject, the OP posted this:
which showed that just about every other country (especially in Europe) that had a lower child poverty rate had a socialistic economy - two threads on the subject but no forum consensus on a possible solution to the problem
The workers have consistantly failed to protect themselves from the thinkers. Unless thinking people are dealt with there's no hope for worker succession.
Capitalism doesn't help feed children. Wherever did you get such an idea? People feed children, Capitalism doesn't engage in anything that does not show a profit.
The workers have consistantly failed to protect themselves from the thinkers. Unless thinking people are dealt with there's no hope for worker succession.
Taking the average into account how would this 'fact' alter the poverty line? $20 in the US is about $2 worth of food in most places, it's the other $80 a day you need for the other necessities of life that makes being poor a bitch. Some of them could teach the rich to be able to do the same and that would make the thought of being without money as being something they can take in stride.in the other thread that we had on the subject, the OP posted this:
which showed that just about every other country (especially in Europe) that had a lower child poverty rate had a socialistic economy - two threads on the subject but no forum consensus on a possible solution to the problem
Capitalism doesn't help feed children. Wherever did you get such an idea? People feed children, Capitalism doesn't engage in anything that does not show a profit. Which explains why Republicans want to cut back on food stamps, school meal programs, etc. It is against their capitalist puppet masters interests. The richest azzholes in the US, the Koch brothers, want to deregulate anything in the country that helps the poor or gets in the way of maximizing their profits. Capitalism is going to wipe out humanity and most of the other living things on this planet and all the capitalist can think of is money. Well they will get wiped out along with everybody else.