
Buddhists don't believe in reincarnation? Well now, that's an interesting "fact." I'll have to pass it on to the Buddhists I know that do believe in it. And I personally know quite a few of them. You're wrong. That statement is incorrect.

Dang! There I go again, missing details. When I signed on, I missed the one about being offended by certain behaviours disqualfies a person from belonging to this forum. I must go back and check the rules to see where I goofed.
Thanks for bringing that up. I will endeavour to do better in the future by ceasing to be offended by certain remarks and/or subjects. And if I can't manage that, I shall withdraw.
After all, I need to remain positive in my thinking so I can keep my aging process on schedule. That is the topic, right?

The first christians certainly did believe in reincarnation, that is in part why they were exterminated. Can you think of any reason why the universe would not follow the laws of conservation and recycle your little spark back into another bag of bones for you to continue the real purpose of life?
WOW! What happened to all your spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, etc.? You didn't plagiarize this thing did you

OK, without the burden of science mucking things up and adding confusion, prove there is no afterlife. In a spiritual sense, of course.

Well, for Buddhists, there's rebirth, which is not quite the same, but is conceptually very close for the purposes of this discussion.
Many Sufi Moslems believe in reincarnation.
Hindus believe that the soul is immortal, while the body is born and dies.
In Jainism, particular reference is given to how -- (gods) also reincarnate after they die.
Sikhs believe that every creature has a Soul; on death, the Soul is passed from one body to another until Liberation

Faith is stronger than proof anyway, where proof can not exist faith reigns supreme.

Not sure if Buddhist monks use the stuff or not. Shaman from all over the planet, on the other hand, used all kinds of hallucinogens. They delved into other realms of reality, not always with the use of drugs. Many traditions used drumming and/or chanting to achieve altered states.

The real question to ponder is, "Is there life after birth?" It could all be just a giant illusion. Buddhists say what we call life is a dream and that what we call dreaming is the real life.

I will, if you first oblige me by proving something.
I say that on the dark side of the moon, the side not visible to us, there is a two story house, made of gingerbread and Swiss cheese, hermetically sealed, with a pool filled with maple syrup in the back yard.
Now, you prove to me that such a house does not exist. Then I will prove to you that there is no afterlife.

The personality does not go in the hole. The energy that animates the body does not go in the hole. The personalities/spirits/minds accumulated experience does not go in the hole, it is used elsewhere I think.

There is no evidence to the contrary, JLM. Just as there is no evidence against the existence of Santa Clause (or there is no evidence against my claim that I have been to Jupiter in the past 20 years).
Whether there is any evidence against there being any after life is besides the point. We must look at what evidence is there for it, and there is practically none.

Buddhists do not believe in reincarnation as we commonly understand the word.

Quite so, countryboy. One needs a thick skin to participate in forums like these.

What a strange life you must have had so far. I've experienced quite a number of things I never believed would happen to me, until they did.

If you believe in reincarnation, what does longevity have to do with anything?

And if you've ever known someone who's had a stroke, a brain tumour, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's... Physical damage to the brain changes the personality. What more evidence do you need that consciousness and personality emerge from the complexity of the brain and do not exist without it?