Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy
Well, let's see if we can find that elusive bridge between the "fact" and the "insult"...I submit that at least some of the researchers (and certainly the fund-raising folks) for cancer research might feel a bit insulted that some layman could come along and say that their entire careers have been built on a fabrication of the truth - that a cure for cancer is possible.
Nothing of the sort, coutnryboy. Even a layman is allowed have opinions about expert subjects like cancer research, we have freedom of expression in this country. Nobody would take him seriously of course. But he is entitled to have an opinion, I don't see anybody being insulted by it.
I don't know why you think that a layman is not allowed to have an opinion on cancer research. Indeed, prolifers in USA think that all the money spent on sex education is wasted (they think that sex educators are the spawn of the Devil), they would like to get rid fo sex education in US schools. Should the sex educators feel insulted by it?
Or religious right in USA would like to abolish Department of Education, National Endowment of arts etc. Religious right thinks that these institutions are harmful, they promote non Biblican philosophy. Should educators, artists feel insulted by it?
We are allowed to have any opinon on a subject that we wish, nobody feels insulted by it. Now it you start insulting people personally, that is a different matter.
Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy
Taking it further, they might even think I was questioning their skills and credentials. After all, after the billions of dollars have been spent, people are still suffering and dying from cancer. So, lots of money and time expended, with no results.
Question away, that is your right. People question the credentials of experts all the time. If you have credibility, people will listen to you, if you lack credibility, people will ignore you.That is all part of the debate, part of the discussion.
You seem to have a misunderstanding as to what constitutes a legitimate debate. There must be no personal insults. Other than that, there are very few boundaries.