Is Fukushima About to Blow?


MHz
#241
You are a really daft ****tard.

 
EagleSmack
#242
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

You are a really daft ****tard.

Oh... is that what 1 Million dead looks like?

Puh-leeze
 
MHz
#243
You are alive, yet your stench much worse than than of any thing that has ever died. lol What a sorry *** excuse for a human.

Take that pic (or the one below) to your next pub outing and joke it off, you wouldn't make it halfway to the door looked much sadder than the young lad in the pic.

File:Kiev-UkrainianNationalChernobylMuseum 15.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited by MHz; Apr 29th, 2011 at 06:31 PM..
 
CDNBear
#244
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

You are a really daft ****tard.

Is that what your dad said, when he took the picture of you, below?
Quote:

You look terrible, but that's what happens when your parents were related before marriage. Sad too, but that's understandable, after what your dad called you.
 
MHz
#245
Hey Shirley, you dumb little bitch, you forgot to include how the 6,000,000 figure was arrived at.

Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBear
Just curious question Mhz, but why are you so quick to artificially inflate the number of dead from Chernobyl, but question the number of dead Joos? Seems a little hypocritical if you ask me.
 
CDNBear
#246
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Hey Shirley, you dumb little bitch, you forgot to include how the 6,000,000 figure was arrived at.

Now that I know what you look like and how your dad treats you. I'll let that silly insult slide.

Quote:

Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBear

Just curious question Mhz, but why are you so quick to artificially inflate the number of dead from Chernobyl, but question the number of dead Joos? Seems a little hypocritical if you ask me.

What part didn't you get?

You for got to show how that 1,000,000 was arrived at.
 
MHz
#247
Trying to set new standard on what constitutes a ****tard? lol

This message is hidden because CDNBear is on your ignore list (external - login to view).
 
CDNBear
#248
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Trying to set new standard on what constitutes a ****tard, lol

I agree, and you're doing an excellent job.

Quote:

This message is hidden because CDNBear is on your ignore list (external - login to view).

Yet you keep replying.
 
MHz
#249
Trying to set new standard on what constitutes a ****tard? lol

This message is hidden because CDNBear is on your ignore list (external - login to view).
 
CDNBear
+1
#250
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Trying to set new standard on what constitutes a ****tard, lol

I agree, and you're doing an excellent job.

Quote:

This message is hidden because CDNBear is on your ignore list (external - login to view).

Yet you keep replying.
 
EagleSmack
+1
#251
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

You are alive, yet your stench much worse than than of any thing that has ever died. lol What a sorry *** excuse for a human.

Oh please... just because a million people didn't die doesn't mean you have to get your panties all bunched up.

Quote:

Take that pic (or the one below) to your next pub outing and joke it off, you wouldn't make it halfway to the door looked much sadder than the young lad in the pic.

Now why would I do that?

I'd never exploit the poor lad either to draw sympathy for something that is false.
 
MHz
#252
sympathy??? You are the one promoting there was only a few that suffered the effects of radiation, clearly no have no ****ing idea about the facts.

****tards like yourself are just annoying, when a person is lying to themselves it never ceases to amaze me. That's why I find you so disgusting as I do.
 
CDNBear
#253
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

when a person is lying to themselves it never ceases to amaze me.

You aren't alone. You lying to yourself, amazes us too.

Quote:

That's why I find you so disgusting as I do.

Let it all out Mhz, tell us more of what your dad said to you. You'll find it cathartic.
 
MHz
#254
Now who would have a vested interest in keeping people in the dark? Seems with Exxon it was delay the courts until the victims died, looke like Japan's economy means all workers back to where the were before the melt-downs, the banksters must be lathering at the jowls when they don't get their monthly pound of flesh. How odd that all n-power plants that could be a danger to the 41 Eutopean estates have been permanently shut down.
Weather chief draws flak over plea not to release radiation forecasts | Kyodo News (external - login to view)
 
CDNBear
#255
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Now who would have a vested interest in keeping people in the dark?

What are the sites you usually get informed at?
 
EagleSmack
+1
#256
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

sympathy??? You are the one promoting there was only a few that suffered the effects of radiation, clearly no have no ****ing idea about the facts.

You always were a slow learner.

What I said was 1 Million did not die. I was right. The facts support me, not you.



Quote:

****tards like yourself are just annoying, when a person is lying to themselves it never ceases to amaze me. That's why I find you so disgusting as I do.

Because I rely on facts and you inflate a death toll because you actually WANT 1 Million to have died? Who's the disgusting one now?

Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Now who would have a vested interest in keeping people in the dark? Seems with Exxon it was delay the courts until the victims died, looke like Japan's economy means all workers back to where the were before the melt-downs, the banksters must be lathering at the jowls when they don't get their monthly pound of flesh. How odd that all n-power plants that could be a danger to the 41 Eutopean estates have been permanently shut down.
Weather chief draws flak over plea not to release radiation forecasts | Kyodo News (external - login to view)


 
MHz
#257
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Because I rely on facts and you inflate a death toll because you actually WANT 1 Million to have died? Who's the disgusting one now?

You are as disgusting as it gets. I'll stand-by the in-depth report rather than you. You don't even have to wonder if they were making 'deals' with a bunch of other gov funded organizations. Lets see the update where they mention all the resources available.

(in part)
On the 20th Anniversary of Chernobyl WHO and the IAEA published the Chernobyl Forum Report, mentioning only 350 sources, mainly from the English literature while in reality there are more than 30,000 publications and up to 170,000 sources that address the consequences of Chernobyl.
After waiting two decades for the findings of Chernobyl to be recognized by the United Nations, three scientists, Alexey Yablokov from Russia, and Vasily Nesterenko and Alexey Nesterenko from Belarus undertook the task to collect, abstract and translate some 5000 articles reported by multiple scientists, who observed first-hand the effects from the fallout. These had been published largely in Slavic languages and not previously available in translation. The result was Chernobyl – Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment (external - login to view), published by the New York Academy of Sciences in 2009.
Dr. Janette D. Sherman, M. D.: Chernobyl, 25 Years Later (external - login to view)
 
EagleSmack
#258
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

You are as disgusting as it gets.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Quote:

(in part)
On the 20th Anniversary of Chernobyl WHO and the IAEA published the Chernobyl Forum Report, mentioning only 350 sources, mainly from the English literature while in reality there are more than 30,000 publications and up to 170,000 sources that address the consequences of Chernobyl.
After waiting two decades for the findings of Chernobyl to be recognized by the United Nations, three scientists, Alexey Yablokov from Russia, and Vasily Nesterenko and Alexey Nesterenko from Belarus undertook the task to collect, abstract and translate some 5000 articles reported by multiple scientists, who observed first-hand the effects from the fallout. These had been published largely in Slavic languages and not previously available in translation. The result was Chernobyl – Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment (external - login to view), published by the New York Academy of Sciences in 2009.
Dr. Janette D. Sherman, M. D.: Chernobyl, 25 Years Later (external - login to view)

 
MHz
#259
Don't tell me Shirley is giving you more posting pointers.

Russian scientist estimate 100s of thousands of Chernobyl fallout deaths (external - login to view)

Russian scientists recently reviewed the impacts of Chernobyl’s 1986 meltdown, and concluded: “The calculations suggest that the Chernobyl catastrophe has already killed several hundred thousand human beings in a population of several hundred million that was unfortunate enough to live in territories affected by the fallout. The number of Chernobyl victims will continue to grow over many future generations.”



 
CDNBear
+1
#260
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Don't tell me Shirley is giving you more posting pointers.

Is Shirley, your invisible friend? I thought she killed herself?
 
MHz
#261
(in part)

Many experts find this figure grossly understated. Greenpeace has predicted that Chernobyl may ultimately cause some 2,70,000 cancer cases, more than 90,000 of which could prove fatal. In a book published in 2007, Russian biologist Alexei Yablokov and two Ukrainian researchers concluded that some 9,85,000 people had already died, mainly of cancer, till 2004. The book, called Chernobyl in Russian, was brought out in English two years later by the New York Academy of Sciences under the title Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment. Dr. Yablokov, former environmental advisor to the Russian President, has since updated his estimate of Chernobyl-related deaths, including stillbirths, to 1.6 million.
Such estimates are fiercely contested by IAEA experts. The official view of the U.N. watchdog is that the expected death toll among those affected by high radiation doses at Chernobyl may reach 4,000 in the coming decades. Compare this with the official data from Ukraine's Health Ministry: 530,000 died from radiation in the former Soviet state between 1987 and 2004.
 
EagleSmack
+1
#262
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Don't tell me Shirley is giving you more posting pointers.

I'm not... and don't call me Shirley.

Ohhhhhhhhh!




Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

(in part)

Dr. Yablokov, former environmental advisor to the Russian President, has since updated his estimate of Chernobyl-related deaths, including stillbirths, to 1.6 million.
.

They counted stillbirths too!

Wow... they struggled to get that number!

I love it... Chernobyl-RELATED deaths. In other words... any person that died for WHATEVER reason.

Just to reach that number that they couldn't through radiation sickness. Talk about desperate.
 
MHz
#263
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Just to reach that number that they couldn't through radiation sickness. Talk about desperate.

I'm a Christian, life begins at conception. A ****tard would consider somebody under a certain $$/yr as not worth counting.

They look surprizingly just like the DU babies in, well , every ****ing place you guys go with your war machine. Total ****tard through and through.

Again your reading comprehension is matching your brain-waves, flat-lining. Shirley is that toothless gummy bear, you are Dorothy, (not in Kansas anymore)
Last edited by MHz; Apr 29th, 2011 at 09:10 PM..
 
CDNBear
#264
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Shirley is that toothless gummy bear

Your invisble friend is a toothless gummy bear named Shirley?

That's cute.
 
MHz
#265
I have to say a prayer of repentance every time I swear at you two. It's only fair to warn you that I don't find 'chatting' to my Master to be a burden. Perhaps a shorter and clear name is in order, Pete and Re-Pete is much more fitting for a public place like this, in your case make no mistake, it means ****tard of the highest order. Bear is a flat out liar and you just have no morality when it comes to protecting 'children' which is anybody under you in terms of your God, the Almighty $$$. Christ doesn't insist on winning every round, just the last one. Pretty much the one and only 'punch' He ever throws at the ankle-bitters.

I doubt if God's 'view' on genetic contamination taking about 3 generations before the 'effects' are 'much closer to normal'. For the uninformed it means delay having children for as long as possible if you have been in a radiated area. Even then if a child is deformed to the extent that they 'cannot function' and they will not be able to reproduce it might be a lot kinder to them to expire at birth in their mothers arms. Once word gets out that all is not well with the child perhaps it can even be ended sooner, not having children is the best solution if their welfare is put at the top of the list.

When is somebody going to call the sparrows who live there a new species?
 
CDNBear
+1
#266
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Bear is a flat out liar

Back to that weak, unsupported claim again eh.
 
MHz
#267
It may have been better if he had stayed on an fought for their rights, moving out of the way for the steam-roller is not going to help the children that will be affected.

Top Japan Nuclear Official Resigns Over Decision To Subject Children To High Radiation | Alexander Higgins Blog (external - login to view)
 
EagleSmack
+1
#268
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

It's only fair to warn you that I don't find 'chatting' to my Master to be a burden.

I'm flattered! Well we can chat anytime then.
 
CDNBear
#269
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

I'm flattered! Well we can chat anytime then.



Well played!
 
JLM
#270
I guess with all the mayhem and destruction from the tornados in the South, that one has moved to the back burner.
 

Similar Threads

31
Before you Liberals blow a gasket...
by CDNBear | Dec 7th, 2006
7
Where's Gonda Blow
by galianomama | Jan 2nd, 2005
no new posts