Is Fukushima About to Blow?


Retired_Can_Soldier
+2
#211
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

So where are the million + dead?

The forums are full of crazy people. Too bad we couldn't dispense the meds digitally eh.
 
CDNBear
#212
Quote: Originally Posted by Retired_Can_SoldierView Post

The forums are full of crazy people. Too bad we couldn't dispense the meds digitally eh.

 
MHz
#213
Same place as the rest of the dead, in the ground. Eagle is losing his dad to cancer, I would bet the Gummerment told him it was quite safe to work with without any protection at all. As you can see not all crazies are on this forum. Japan is just setting it up so 'heart attack' can be stamped on any death certificate fro the age of 6 to 96. The denial is there, same with exporting asbestos, as long as it is far enough removed that 'the exporters' can't be sued it a legit move that harms no one. Everybody on that 'tour' most likely had showers that were twice as long as normal.

(in part)
Tokyo, Japan, 22 April, 2011 – Greenpeace today called on the Japanese government to drop plans to raise the official limits of radiation exposure for children in Fukushima Prefecture, 20 milliSievert per year (1) – the same level as nuclear power plant workers, and twenty times the internationally recognised annual allowable dose for adults.
The international environmental organisation has also asked the governments of nations including Germany, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Canada, Greece, India, France and Italy (2), to raise the issue with Japan.
“It is utterly outrageous to raise the exposure levels for children to twenty times the maximum limit for adults. The Japanese government cannot simply increase safety limits for the sake political convenience or to give the impression of normality”, said Junichi Sato, Greenpeace Japan Executive Director. “One of the lessons learned from Chernobyl was that children are far more vulnerable to the effects of radiation, and the Fukushima nuclear crisis will expose them to much higher risks of developing radiation related diseases due to contamination (3)”.
reliefweb.int/node/397989 (external - login to view)
 
CDNBear
+1
#214
So where's the million+ dead?
 
MHz
#215
(in part)

This week, we hear a repeat of Dr Caldicott’s May 17 program featuring an interview with Janette D. Sherman, M.D. on the long-term effects of the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown. Dr. Sherman has recently completed the translation and editing of the book Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and Nature, published by the New York Academy of Sciences in December 2009, which indicates that nearly one million people were killed by the Chernobyl disaster. Download and read the book for free by following the instructions on this page.

New York Academy of Sciences Chernobyl book now free; interview with editor Janette D. Sherman, M.D. - Democratic Underground (external - login to view)
 
CDNBear
#216
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

(in part)

This week, we hear a repeat of Dr Caldicott’s May 17 program featuring an interview with Janette D. Sherman, M.D. on the long-term effects of the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown. Dr. Sherman has recently completed the translation and editing of the book Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and Nature, published by the New York Academy of Sciences in December 2009, which indicates that nearly one million people were killed by the Chernobyl disaster. Download and read the book for free by following the instructions on this page.

New York Academy of Sciences Chernobyl book now free; interview with editor Janette D. Sherman, M.D. - Democratic Underground (external - login to view)

My bad, I thought you actually meant killed by Chernobyl, not a connect the dots guessing game.

So much for being on your iggy list, lol.
 
MHz
#217
190 pages, hope you choke on every word on every page
Chapter II. Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe for Public Health


  1. Chapter II. Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe for Public Health (pages 31–220) (external - login to view)Alexey B. Nesterenko, Vassily B. Nesterenko and Alexey V. Yablokov
    Article first published online: 30 NOV 2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04822.x
    • Abstract (external - login to view)
    • Full Article (HTML) (external - login to view)
    • PDF(29966K) (external - login to view)
    • References (external - login to view)
es (external - login to view)
 
CDNBear
#218
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

190 pages, hope you choke on every word on every page

Did you read them all?

Maybe you could just quote the pertinent pages.

And I'm glad I'm still not on your iggy list.
 
EagleSmack
#219
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Same place as the rest of the dead, in the ground. Eagle is losing his dad to cancer, I would bet the Gummerment told him it was quite safe to work with without any protection at all.

Hmmm... not quite. Sorry to spoil it for you.

Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

So where's the million+ dead?

Hey Bear, in an article I read, not enough people in the Chernoble area were dying of cancer. So the "No Nukes" started counting "heart attacks" as a direct result of Chernoble!

Heart attacks in the land where if you don't smoke and drink vodka by age 10 you would appear out of the norm.
 
MHz
#220
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Hmmm... not quite. Sorry to spoil it for you.

I though you mentioned something like that on the asbestos thread.

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Hey Bear, in an article I read, not enough people in the Chernoble area were dying of cancer. So the "No Nukes" started counting "heart attacks" as a direct result of Chernoble!

Need your proofreader's help. WAFT lol Again you show you missed the show, those deaths were for the ones that did the inspection many years after the tomb was erected, the part the animals left alive in the area will be for the mutated calves and pups and kittens. Like the children in the Ukraine they will be 'downers' from birth, life isn't kind enough to let them die. Even the soldiers that did the actual cleanup didn't start dieing until a few months had passed. Try taking the toll at the end of the year.


Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Heart attacks in the land where if you don't smoke and drink vodka by age 10 you would appear out of the norm.

Don't the Irish burn up all by themselves, if they make it to old age. It's a 5 part vid, want to see the leader give the details of why he was the only one to be there to do the narration? It's like reclassifying the dead soldiers overseas, if it isn't a combat wound (caused by the enemy) they aren't classified as a 'causality of war'. See how civilized we have become.
 
EagleSmack
#221
At any rate... have you found those 1 Million dead yet?

Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

I though you mentioned something like that on the asbestos thread.
.

Something like that... but not quite. Sorry to dissapoint.
 
MHz
#222
If I was looking for disappointment in that area it would be that he didn't have a vasectomy before you were hatched. Not a big deal either but mine would have lived longer if he wore his bandana more often when the horsed were maling dust from topsoil. If you were pushing grass from the other side tomorrow it wouldn't bother me at all.

That's not even an insult, it's just the way it is.

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

At any rate... have you found those 1 Million dead yet?

YES, YES I HAVE

The link was already posted, get me permission from the boss and I'll post every name I can find with their full medical history.

Be sure to let him know it's a 30mg file. Can I also assume you now consider this place that hosts the article as a 'nazi organization' in that they disagree with you and that toothless ****tard that is also you mentor. Only you two would say 1 and 1 makes 11. LOL
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences



onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...sue-1/issuetoc (external - login to view)
 
EagleSmack
#223
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

If I was looking for disappointment in that area it would be that he didn't have a vasectomy before you were hatched. Not a big deal either but mine would have lived longer if he wore his bandana more often when the horsed were maling dust from topsoil. If you were pushing grass from the other side tomorrow it wouldn't bother me at all.


Awww... now that wasn't so nice. Just because you're wrong there is no need to get all upset.

1 Million dead at Chernoble... lmao.
 
MHz
#224
Which part of the report are you referencing, that's a lot of pages.

But then you don't consider the DU babies as being a casuality of your wars either. Be careful the Awww doesn't turn into an Oweee. Yes that does include the lull in munitions for that decade the shooting stopped, taking notes on how the 'tests' were going. Those same mutations are now desired, the weapon is probably being refined even as we speak, after all, Reservations are a lot of work. Time to cull the harvest that was the exploration and conquest of North America.

Back to your bridge troll and take gummy with you.
 
CDNBear
#225
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Which part of the report are you referencing, that's a lot of pages.

But then you don't consider the DU babies as being a casuality of your wars either. Be careful the Awww doesn't turn into an Oweee. Yes that does include the lull in munitions for that decade the shooting stopped, taking notes on how the 'tests' were going. Those same mutations are now desired, the weapon is probably being refined even as we speak, after all, Reservations are a lot of work. Time to cull the harvest that was the exploration and conquest of North America.

Back to your bridge troll and take gummy with you.

Just curious question Mhz, but why are you so quick to artificially inflate the number of dead from Chernobyl, but question the number of dead Joos? Seems a little hypocritical if you ask me.
 
Stretch
#226
1 Million Dead from Chernobyl

A new book published by the New York Academy of Sciences titled Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment examines 5,000 different studies, including many published only in Russian and other Slavic languages, and concludes that the Chernobyl disaster has so far killed 1 million people (external - login to view), and continues to kill. The actual estimate was just below 1 million at 985,000.
In addition, Chernobyl may have caused increased child thyroid cancer rates as far away as Connecticut.
15% of the 830,000 liquidators sent in to clean up the mess were killed by radioactivity.
I believe that these findings are correct.
1 Million Dead from Chernobyl | Robert Lindsay (external - login to view)



Chernobyl Radiation Killed Nearly One Million People: New Book

NEW YORK, New York, April 26, 2010 (ENS) - Nearly one million people around the world died from exposure to radiation released by the 1986 nuclear disaster at the Chernobyl reactor, finds a new book from the New York Academy of Sciences published today on the 24th anniversary of the meltdown at the Soviet facility.

The book, "Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment," was compiled by authors Alexey Yablokov of the Center for Russian Environmental Policy in Moscow, and Vassily Nesterenko and Alexey Nesterenko of the Institute of Radiation Safety, in Minsk, Belarus.
Chernobyl Radiation Killed Nearly One Million People: New Book (external - login to view)



Harmless? Chernobyl Radiation Killed Nearly One Million People (external - login to view)



Coverup Broken by Scientists: Nearly 1 Million Dead by 2004 From Chernobyl Explosion, Fire, Cleanup, and Fallout
Coverup Broken by Scientists: Nearly 1 Million Dead by 2004 From Chernobyl Explosion, Fire, Cleanup, and Fallout [.Common Sense] (external - login to view)



1 million dead after chernobyl - Dogpile Web Search (external - login to view)
 
EagleSmack
+1
#227
Quote: Originally Posted by StretchView Post

1 Million Dead from Chernobyl

Yet the WHO and IAEA could only account for 9,000.

Of course the 1 Million number came from people who died of anything, like heart disease and simply included them to make their ficticious number.

FAIL

Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Just curious question Mhz, but why are you so quick to artificially inflate the number of dead from Chernobyl, but question the number of dead Joos? Seems a little hypocritical if you ask me.

She has to. Her existence is based on this stuff.
 
MHz
#228
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Yet the WHO and IAEA could only account for 9,000.

So the USSR army sends in the troops first and most of them are in areas that allow only a few minutes at best, if their numbers are accurate . I also read sites like this which mentions the organizations you do. Downplaying the dangers saves money, that is the a major part of it, saving a person a few years (of non productive life) might not be very high on the State's list of priorities. It certainly has never been that way at any time in the past, the only difference is method used for the slaughter.

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Of course the 1 Million number came from people who died of anything, like heart disease and simply included them to make their ficticious number.

If a baby is born with his brains outside the skull I'm going to count his death as radiation caused, call me old fashioned but that is the just way it is. Most of those born with genetic defects are also sterile, count their non-existence relatives as a consequence rather than a casuality. It is still part of the price of the 'total damage' Let Gummy bear know to get the 6 million being gassed you have to include deaths from all other causes also, typhus, starvation, etc. Counting the Ukrainians killed a few decades earlier was easy, starvation, one and all. If it froze one night and some dies, should they be taken off the total who died?

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

FAIL

As as human that promotes equal protection for everybody yes you did, yet once again. That doesn't mean you are standing alone

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

She has to. Her existence is based on this stuff.

I can still mourn if the number is less than the desired 6,000,000, you two seem to have problem with it though. Suck it up girls.


The way the twister season is starting off I would suggest they start exploring the art of putting a shipping container in the ground as protection from being 'not in Kansas anymore', why not go help them, you seem to have extra time on your paws.
 
CDNBear
+1
#229
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

I can still mourn if the number is less than the desired 6,000,000.

But you don't mourn. You seem to question the whole deal.

Quote:

you two seem to have problem with it though.

Problem with what? Questioning the numbers? Nope, not me. You go right aheadan question the numbers.

Quote:

Suck it up girls.

There's nothing left when you're done.

Quote:

The way the twister season is starting off I would suggest they start exploring the art of putting a shipping container in the ground as protection from being 'not in Kansas anymore', why not go help them, you seem to have extra time on your paws.

I don't live near you, so I can't help out in your trailer park.
 
EagleSmack
#230
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

So the USSR army sends in the troops first and most of them are in areas that allow only a few minutes at best, if their numbers are accurate . I also read sites like this which mentions the organizations you do. Downplaying the dangers saves money, that is the a major part of it, saving a person a few years (of non productive life) might not be very high on the State's list of priorities. It certainly has never been that way at any time in the past, the only difference is method used for the slaughter.

In other words... blahblahblah?


Quote:

If a baby is born with his brains outside the skull I'm going to count his death as radiation caused, call me old fashioned but that is the just way it is. Most of those born with genetic defects are also sterile, count their non-existence relatives as a consequence rather than a casuality. It is still part of the price of the 'total damage'

Of course you would! In fact just about EVERY illness and death was LATER attributed to Chernobyl because the desired amount of people didn't die because of the disaster. They HAD to count everything.


Quote:

As as human that promotes equal protection for everybody yes you did, yet once again. That doesn't mean you are standing alone

Facts simply don't support you. You need those.

FAIL


Quote:

The way the twister season is starting off I would suggest they start exploring the art of putting a shipping container in the ground as protection from being 'not in Kansas anymore', why not go help them, you seem to have extra time on your paws.

I take it you're enjoying another tradgedy?
 
MHz
#231
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

I take it you're enjoying another tradgedy?

If I was I would have posted something different than a suggestion to get underground.
 
EagleSmack
#232
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

If I was I would have posted something different than a suggestion to get underground.

Not many twisters around Boston these days.
 
MHz
#233
I guess you are a spectator then, good way to be when the base is a mile wide.
Bye
 
EagleSmack
+1
#234
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

I guess you are a spectator then, good way to be when the base is a mile wide.
Bye

A mile wide and 500 miles away!

Adios!
 
Stretch
#235
K
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

Yet the WHO and IAEA could only account for 9,000.

Of course the 1 Million number came from people who died of anything, like heart disease and simply included them to make their ficticious number.

FAIL



She has to. Her existence is based on this stuff.

Eaglesmack, do you trust anything that "who" says after the swineflu hoax/fraud? After that debarcle, i wouldnt trust anything they said. And as for the iaea, that'd be like the mafia investigating itself and then telling us how many deaths they are responsible for, LOL if your interested, i have a nice waterfront property for sale ............................. at low tide
Last edited by Stretch; Apr 28th, 2011 at 06:30 PM..
 
EagleSmack
#236
Quote: Originally Posted by StretchView Post

K
Eaglesmack, do you trust anything that "who" says after the swineflu hoax/fraud? After that debarcle, i wouldnt trust anything they said. And as for the iaea, that'd be like the mafia investigating itself and then telling us how many deaths they are responsible for, LOL if your interested, i have a nice waterfront property for sale ............................. at low tide

And the W.H.O? What is their motivation?

One Million dead. Puhleeeze.
 
bill barilko
+1
#237
 
MHz
#238
(in part)
It’s a delicate balance between cooperation and collusion.
Signed on May 28, 1959 at the 12th World Health Assembly, the agreement states:
“Whenever either organization proposes to initiate a programme or activity on a subject in which the other organization has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter by mutual agreement,” and continues: The IAEA and the WHO “recognize that they may find it necessary to apply certain limitations for the safeguarding of confidential information furnished to them. They therefore agree that nothing in this agreement shall be construed as requiring either of them to furnish such information as would, in the judgment of the other party possessing the information to interfere wit the orderly conduct of its operation.”
The WHO mandate is to look after the health on our planet, while the IAEA is to promote nuclear energy.
Dr. Janette D. Sherman, M. D.: Chernobyl, 25 Years Later (external - login to view)

Last edited by MHz; Apr 29th, 2011 at 07:46 AM..
 
eanassir
#239
The people of Japan and the people of Nineveh

When I heard Busby the British scientist in the European Nuclear Agency [as in the U-tube of petros], my opinion about the danger of Fukushima catastrophe was confirmed.
There is a nuclear explosion that happened, there is continuous leak which is out of control, and there is a tremendous radiation emmitted till now and is continuous till 6-9 months and may be longer. The radiation was detected at Heity in America.

So now what will the Japanese do? Will they rent their garments and weep? Or will they struck their heads in the wall?
They are helpless and cannot do anything; even the concrete barrier that they intended to build is ineffective according to Busby.

Therefore, they have to do like the people of Nineveh did towards Prophet Jonah.

When Jonah came to Nineveh and asked them to devote themselves to God alone [this is The First Commandment] (external - login to view), its people denied him at first and kept up to their idols and idolatry; so he left them after threatening them with the punishment to come on them 3 days later, then the comet came into their sky, so they supplicated God and broke up all their idols and repented; so God Most Gracious shiftet that comet which fell in another region.

Q:47 (external - login to view)



Therefore, the Japanese people have to abandon their idolatry and broke up all their idols, and believe in God Most Gracious alone without associate or patron, and let God the Creator be their true and exclusive Patron. Let them also believe in all God's prophets including the noble prophet and apostle Mohammed, and should believe in the Quran to enlight their way in their life of the World and in the next afterlife.

In such case God alone can reverse the situation from dangerous to safety and avoid them the earthquake so that it will not come again on them.

About the monotheism in the Bible (external - login to view)

 
EagleSmack
#240
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

(in part)
It’s a delicate balance between cooperation and collusion.
Signed on May 28, 1959 at the 12th World Health Assembly, the agreement states:

“Whenever either organization proposes to initiate a programme or activity on a subject in which the other organization has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter by mutual agreement,” and continues: The IAEA and the WHO “recognize that they may find it necessary to apply certain limitations for the safeguarding of confidential information furnished to them. They therefore agree that nothing in this agreement shall be construed as requiring either of them to furnish such information as would, in the judgment of the other party possessing the information to interfere wit the orderly conduct of its operation.”

The WHO mandate is to look after the health on our planet, while the IAEA is to promote nuclear energy.

In other words... they won't agree with the 1 Million dead number so there must be a conspiracy?

1 Million Dead... puh-leeeeze
 

Similar Threads

31
Before you Liberals blow a gasket...
by CDNBear | Dec 7th, 2006
7
Where's Gonda Blow
by galianomama | Jan 2nd, 2005
no new posts