Quote: Originally Posted by L Gilbert
Get your own clue. You want to be abusive, head off to the cage or keep civil posting habits.
Fk'n isn't an insult.... Requesting you to get a clue isn't an insult. Telling you that the clues pour out when you open your eyes is not an insult, that's just explaining the obvious.
Jeeez you swear a lot. You have problems with a short vocabulary?
Nope... but it does get more attention then trying to be civil it would seem, as I've already tried that route several times already..... but you couldn't even address accurately what was being presented to you multiple times and you tried to generalize something in which didn't even represent what I was saying.... so it would seem you are the one with the problem with vocabulary.
I have lived in or near the bush my whole life and I have never seen a harmless animal yet. Even your poor, "harmless" chipmink can carry diseases. Your poor, harmless little bambis can kick the crap out of the average man.
Those are usually signs to leave them the hell alone then.... but hey, if you can blow their brains out with a gun, then I suppose that shows them who's boss.
I grew up with deer, moose, rabbits, coyotes, skunks, racoons and yes, even your evil little chipmunks. I never had to shoot any of them, even when they continually landed on my property for whatever reason.
I mean, when you have to resort to shooting every animal that enters your property and use the excuse that they're full of disease, that sounds like paranoia to me.... but did you even bother to see if they were of any risk, or did you just lodge a round in their heads just for the fun of it?
Sometimes there are. I loaded the backside of a blackbear with two salt rounds from my shotgun. He hasn't been back since. But if you'd like to come show me how to deal with a cougar in my chicken pen without killing it, I would be very interested.
Perhaps someday when I have some free time I might. But for starters, one thing I and my family did with animal pests who kept getting into our garbage or eating our animals' food, was to leave the scraps of food out of the garbage and compost bins, put it on a plate somewhere away from the house, they come and eat it, they remove your scraps for you and at the same time, leave your animal's food and your garbage bags alone.
Eventually those rabid evil racoons and skunks weren't such a problem anymore and actually grew into an extended family with my own family.
As it goes for mountain lions / cougars, sure, you have a justification for shooting them, or at least scaring them off.... but once again, as I have to continually repeat myself, I'm not talking about the restriction of firearms for hunting or killing animals.... I was focusing on human on human attacks and the lack of laws towards those things.
Once again, I'm not as black and white on the subject as you or others would like to make me out to be.
You haven't got a clue as to "the like of me".
Nor do you of I.
there you are, back to the dullwitted lack of vocabulary. Using namecalling to win your arguments just like a 5 year old in a sandbox. tsk tsk tsk
Well next time read what's being said properly so I don't have to repeat myself like a teacher for a 5 year old who doesn't listen. If you're going to act like a 5 year old, then I'll talk to you in a way in which you can understand.
Apparently you can't seem to make up your mind what you are talking about. First, you make a comment about the frequency of people getting shot in churches.
Once again Wrong.... I talked about the frequency of people getting shot in general down in the US.... not just in churches.... come on now, seriously...
Then you bring up gun laws.
Yup, I did.
People make analogies to other things that kill and you throw more tantrums.
Sorry, you haven't seen a tantrum of mine yet. And I was talking about the focus on what can be done about gun related violence.... not vehicle related violence.... if you wish to make a topic about vehicles and deaths related to them, knock yourself out.... but this isn't the thread for cars.
Didn't think that was complicated, but I guess it is for some.
Quote: *shakes head*
Then you flipflop and tell us you didn't like a thread being hijacked after you hijack it yourself.
Oh my... hasn't this already been cleared up by several rule quotes and acknowlegements that this wasn't the case and that what I used, and what I attempted to steer this conversation into, match with one another.
But see, now that you can't go and run off on some other tangent and other topic, and you're caught when you hi-jack, you in turn attempt to blame me for hi-jacking......
Question: How the hell can I hi-jack a thread I created before I even started a concept of debate?
Answer: You can't. That would involve some form of time travel.... and I know I am a tallented fellow, I don't think I can do that just yet.
I have been consistant, you haven't.... deal with it.
Then when people call you on it, you throw more tantrums.
Confirming the rules, and pointing out when you and others screwed up is a tantrum? Interesting little world you live in.
I really feel sorry for you, Prax.
Oh by all means, don't.... I certainly don't need imaginary sympathy from a faceless person on the internet. You can do much better things with your time then to feel sorry for me.
I wish I could help your condition but I can't suggest a solution other than your staying away from posters who don't accept your version of things.
Yeah, too bad you still don't get it.