House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Quote: Originally Posted by MikeyDBView Post


Wouldn't that be swell!

If only we could ignore how much the people of America have prospered while so many of the rest of the world grappled with the oppressors sent by America to assure Mr. and Mrs. America of their oil and food and wealth. If only we could reverse the destruction of the planet by a people so focused on consuming everything in sight as their inalienable "right". If only we could ....

Perhaps we should consider a petroleum blockade in response to Americas hunger for vengence and control over Iran....

As long as the bully calls the shots......

All that would be needed is to close our borders off to them like they're trying to do with Mexico, cut all trade and seek alternative trade elsewhere. Most of their imports come from either Canada or China anyways, and if they attack Iran, China's got their back, so they wouldn't be trading with the US anymore, and if we're not trading with them, and considdering the amount of their own internal food sources just went down the drain from that flooding, the US would be quickly crippled.

Of course that's when the US would start pointing nukes at everybody, threatening to fire them if they don't get what they want, all the while claiming to be the victims.
American foreign policy: The state of the world.

Under the tutelage of Israeli Zionists America has embarked on a pogrom of sanctions and embargoes in the effort to demonize Iran. While frustrating and metaphorically castrating the United Nations (U.N. resolutions compelling Saddam Hussein to disclosure of nuclear weapons program) and then using the politics of exaggeration and misdirection to legitimize an invasion of that country, the evidence for Iraqi culpability in both hiding stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction AND the presence of a viable nuclear weapons program….. BOTH proven false inaccurate and an entirely hollow and disingenuous ploy by American neo-cons, America remains hostage to its Israeli overseers.

While the strategy of arming the Mujahideen, ostensibly to deny Russian access to a pipeline corridor, resulted in fragmenting the people of Afghanistan (drug warlords and tribal counsels handed weapons) exacerbating an already serious situation in that nation and relying on the trumped up call to NATO that someone other than the fossil fuel cartels of America were at risk… installing a puppet regime in Kabul with a “president” (one time employee of Exxon) as its ostensible “leadership”…it now has been made apparent that it is in fact America that will gain access to and develop this very same corridor through Afghanistan.

Member nations in NATO have been manipulated by American multi-national cartels to regard the growing of poppy fields (infusing cash-flow based on drug profits to warlords and drug dealers) as appropriate while failing to call upon Pakistan to use its considerable influence and power (aided by America both financially and militarily since the military Junta of Mushariff took power) to deny terrorists an avenue of escape and re-supply.

If the example of embargoes and sanctions against a people (Iraq) guilty of nothing….can serve as an example of enlightened American foreign policy perhaps it’s time to apply this same strategy against a world power that demonstrates and has repeatedly demonstrated its preparedness to lie and misrepresent its “purposes”, by placing an embargo on the United States.

As George Bush calls for increased drilling in wilderness preserves to placate the oil cartels running things in Washington DC….maybe it’s time for America to experience an embargo and feel what its like to suffer. Unlike the sanctions and embargoes levied against Iran and Iraq, the United States is prima facie guilty of distorting the truth about its own agenda and citing false information and lies to further its agenda. The United States has behaved exactly as it accused Saddam Hussein and the government in Tehran of behaving. Lying to inspectors and hiding the actual intent behind its militarism and foreign policy.

We have watched as America has shredded the Geneva Conventions and practiced torture and kidnapping while fashioning itself as the holder of the “higher moral ground”.

America ought to be held as accountable as any other member nation of the community of man and yet, we have read and listened to members here at Canadian Content dismissing any and all culpability. Everyone else is guilty while America is the shining beacon of justice law and moral integrity.

Dangerous Crossroads: Congressional approval before attacking Iran is no longer required

Global Research (external - login to view), June 19, 2008

Ron Paul Claims Pelosi Spiked Iran Bill

Wednesday, June 18, 2008 5:07 PM

By: Rick Pedraza
Representative Ron Paul says House Speaker Nancy Pelosi removed a section from a bill passed by Congress which would have barred the U.S. from going to war with Iran without a congressional vote, claiming she did so at the behest of the leadership of Israel and AIPAC.
Paul, a former Republican presidential contender who formally removed himself from the party’s nomination race last week, makes the allegation on C-SPAN during a recently held foreign policy conference in Virginia.
Paul says Pelosi’s first act as House Speaker in 2006 was to “deliberately” remove a portion of a legislative spending bill which said the United States “can't go to war with Iran without getting approval from Congress.”
According to Paul, Pelosi and her allies in the chamber's Democratic leadership initially accepted the bill designed to outline an Iraq exit strategy, but during a revision of the legislation excluded the statement regarding the need for congressional approval of any military assault on the neighboring country of Iran.
“She [Pelosi] removed it deliberately,” Paul says. “And then, the astounding thing is, when asked why, she said the leadership in Israel asked her to. That was in the newspaper, that was in 'The Washington Post,' that she was asked by AIPAC and others not to do that."
Paul implies Pelosi, desperate to advance her flawed spending legislation, bargained away the proposal that would have been the House leadership's primary vehicle for challenging the administration's policies in the region.
According to John Nichols, who covered the story about Pelosi’s capitulation at the time for “The Nation,” Pelosi was "under pressure from some conservative members of her caucus, and from lobbyists associated with neoconservative groups that want war with Iran, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).”
Paul's allegation is corroborated by 'The Asia Times', which in another article published at the time says AIPAC was strongly against attaching "a provision to a Pentagon spending bill that would require President Bush to get congressional approval before attacking Iran. AIPAC was strongly against it because it viewed the legislation as taking the military option 'off the table.' The provision was killed."
The article also cites Congressman Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, as saying [Pelosi's] decision was due to AIPAC.
© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved

For anyone who believes that Osama bin Barak is superior to John "Nuke'm til they glow and shoot em in the dark McCain....this news should open your eyes to the real power in Amerika....Oy Vey!
So it's obvious enough who actually calls the shots in yankeeland. That's a peculiar position for a super powder isn't it? Money talks democrasy walks.
Darkbeaver, could you just give up all pretense of spelling ?

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Myabe tohse acatkted by yuor datibres mghit cnsioedr tihs mteohd esiar to sotmcah.
I think not
Quote: Originally Posted by PraxiusView Post

The US makes me fk'n sick.

That's just a bonus we have making people like yourself feel sick.

BTW Praxius, you're off topic. Keep on believing GlobalResearch and their spin, you couldn't see the difference between yellow journalism and news if slapped you in the head.
I think not
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Global Research should be renamed Global Bull****.

Aren't they the same bunch of silly souls that claim Bush is setting himself up as President for Life?

To take anything that bunch prints seriously is to prove you have a screw loose.

You'll notice Colpy the en masse cut and paste has begun to defer from the OP because they don't have a leg to stand on. GlobalResearch serves the meek quite well, even after having pointed out the resolution made no mention of a naval blockade.

But I admit, that had a cool pic of warships, ya know being American and all, I love war.
What double-talk and nonsense!

A gang of radical religious extremists committed a criminal act against the people of the United States. These people were not "under the flag" of any nation. This was not an act of war that would under other circumstances have brought the agreements and responsibilities as defined under NATO into play. No nation invaded America! A gang of cuthroats yes, the military of Afghanistan...NO! The government of Saudi Arabia...NO!

In a planned response to an admittedly foreseen possibility the moron in charge, one George W. Bush gave the American people exactly what they wanted...the pretense of retribution and revenge.

As already established by many authorities, the Bush administration had already laid plans as far back as 1991 to invade Iraq. Lacking a legitimate rationale, the hoax of a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction...and rumors of a nuclear weapons development program were inflated and expanded as "justification" for declaring Iraq a "threat" that Bush described as an urgent necessity"..... Hogwash....from front to back!

America goaded into acting by interests in Israel that regarded this opportunity to bring the military might of the United States into the fray directly.... The exposure of the "rationale" completely unsupported and demonstrated as the fantasy it became necessary to inflate and expand the threat of world terrorism....and name Al Qeada and the Taliban as justification for the murder of thousands of Iraqi men women and children. Senate investigations have determined that neither Saddam Hussein NOR Al Qeada represented sufficient grounds for military action against Iraq.

Now that the United States has been sacrificed to the interests of the Israelis....rumors and innuendo supposedly implicating Iran as supplier of weapons and materiel...and perhaps man-power to the mess created by the United States in Iraq now the cause cited by the morons in Washington DC once again doing the bidding of their Israeli masters.

And there's no American with even an iota of integrity participating at Canadian Content to admit that the scenario I've just outlined is the truth whereas the "argument" is couche in terms of "patriotism" and "nationalism" and every lame excuse but the truth.

America and Americans don't have the integrity or the courage to admit they've been used and manipulated and sacrificed their children to a "cause" predicated on lies and misdirection.

That's America for you.
Mikey, you are a broken record.

I am going to sum up all your posts in four bullets:

- The government will **** you, no matter what, even if you lack the foresight to plan your life.
- Jews are evil, invading war mongers
- The US is a commercialistic driven society without remorse for poor.
- Canada is a pawn to the US and is a lackey to the after mentioned commercialism.

That about does it, Mikey.

And all that's acceptable to you isn't it!

But you're right there's little point in discussing the criminality and perversion behind the Bush administration. When Columbian drug dealers or Mexican drug dealers are convicted of crimes in America...there's no call for an invasion of Columbia or Mexico now is there? Why? Because there's nothing "in-it" for Israel.

Durka you like so many here at Canadian Content would rather live in a fantasy than acknowledge the truth. That fantasy will kill you ...and it will kill us all.

Have a nice day!
Good posts, ITN.
Glad to see you're still doing the "Canadian-I-hate-America" watch.

Having been the recipient of such righteous anger, I'm starting to think that most hate misses the truth whereas kindness does not.

America hates Iran ? Iran hates America ?

Some say one or the other is right. Are both wrong ?

When MikeyDB isn't doing the bash America posts, he's showed a very kind, caring human side. MikeyDB might even be right about a lot of his complaints. Actually if you just took out the word America and read the content of his complaint, it would help us see that most of his complaints are caring and sincere. And then again maybe he's ultimately right.

It's just that I've seen hate in my own personal life really hurt me healthwise.
Right now, the worst terrorists in the world are the yankees, led by a warmongering war criminal idiot...

Similar Threads

Massive US Naval Armada Heads For Iran
by quandary121 | Aug 15th, 2008
Russia, China block UN Iran resolution
by Praxius | Mar 4th, 2008
Manitoba chief calls off blockade plans
by CBC News | Jun 21st, 2007
France Calls for Boosting of Ties with Iran
by Blackleaf | Sep 21st, 2006
no new posts