How Iranians Treat Prisoners

how those swine, the Iranians treat prisoners.... compared to the way the us, our "forced upon" allies treat prisoners
--

What a reputable sight... Personally, I'm way more outraged about that conspiracy to keep the miracle pill from me! Bastards....

(Please read with complete sarcasm)

you have a more reputable one there Trac?

I have a list of news sites that I go to on a regular basis....that I've been going to for a number of yrs....and to date, they been pretty much spot on.....as apposed to (cnn) Crap Not News and F(ox)aux or (bbc) British Bull**** Corp.

All news organizations have an agenda. That's achieved in what they include and what they leave out. A reader must be aware of ongoing bias in all sites.

"The news and truth are not the same thing."
~~Walter Lippmann, American journalist, 1889-1974



"We tell the people what they need to know,
not what they want to know." ~~Frank Sesno, CNN News



"Our job is to give people not what they want,
but what we decide they ought to have."
~Richard Salent, former President of CBS News.

"News is what someone wants to suppress.
Everything else is advertising."
~~former NBC news prez Rubin Frank





"I feel sorry for the man who,
after reading the daily newspaper,
goes to bed believing he knows
something of what's going on in the world."
--- Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956)

Anything that doesn't include obvious baloney is fine with me. The conspiracy nuts that wrote about some of the stuff on that site are clearly just nuts.

Where do you get your nut detection equipment?ha ha ah

ok could you point out some of the 'nutty" stuff for me?

Where do you get your"obvious baloney" detection equipment? hahahahahahahah

Come on Stretch you know what she means, it's obvious, it's just nutty.

How about the massive conspiracy to hide miracle cures from the world? They know how to cure cancer, multiple sclerosis, osteoperosis and every other disease known to man. But of course, the big bad medical people don't want you to know about it cause they make money by keeping you sick. The people on that board know though, and they're willing to let you in on the secrets for the low price of $75 for their magazine subscription! YAY!!! Apparently, even though they know all these cures, they haven't been able to get the word out for free.... That kind of thing disgusts me.

It's called common sense. Unfortunately it obviously isn't all that common anymore.

Where do you get your common sence detection equipment?hahahahahah The advice of the multitudes costeth nothing and is usually worth just that.

well, this is free.....
NBC NEWS CLIP MOST EFFECTIVE CANCER TREATMENT


Dr. Sam Chachoua defeats Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in an American Federal Court. The jury awarded this Australian doctor over $10,000,000 in damages after hearing of the conspiracy to suppress and destroy him and his new field of medicine described as promising to be "THE MOST EFFECTIVE THERAPY AGAINST CANCER AND AIDS IN HISTORY." NBC NEWS (AUGUST, 2000)
--

Dr. Sam Chachoua's breakthrough and its suppression--update
--

DR. SAM CHACHOUA
--

Our Best Hope Against Cancer?

Part 1

Dr Sam Chachoua has developed a safe, effective vaccine for healing cancer, AIDS and other terminal illnesses, but medical authorities continue to ignore his work and try to prevent his treatments from becoming widely known.

--


Dr Sam Chachoua has identified 'nemesis organisms' that can control and even cure diseases such as cancer and AIDS, but his therapies have been largely ignored by the medical establishment.

--

you should do a, I would take a guess an say google search for Dr Sam...its all free

Something to read while sipping on that diet soda...

BACKGROUND: Aspartame (L-phenylalanine N-L-alpha-aspartyl-1-methyl ester) is an artificial sweetener with widespread applications. Previously published results have shown that among rats receiving aspartame a significant increase of lymphoreticular neoplasms, brain tumours and transitional cell tumours occurred. The aim of our short-term experiment was to investigate the biological effect of aspartame consumption by determining the expressions of key oncogenes and a tumour suppressor gene. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After one week per os administration of various doses of aspartame to CBA/CA female mice, p53, c-myc, Ha-ras gene expression alterations were determined in individual organs. RESULTS: The results showed an increase in gene expressions concerning all the investigated genes especially in organs with a high proliferation rate: lymphoreticular organs, bone-marrow and kidney. CONCLUSION: Aspartame has a biological effect even at the recommended daily maximum dose.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...=pubmed_DocSum


Aspartame Causes Cancer in Rats at Levels Currently Approved for Humans
A statistically significant increase in the incidence of malignant tumors, lymphomas and leukemias in rats exposed to varying doses of aspartame appears to link the artificial sweetener to a high carcinogenicity rate, according to a study accepted for publication today by the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP).
"Our study has shown that aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic compound whose carcinogenic effects are also evident at a daily dose of 20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg), notably less than the current acceptable daily intake for humans," the authors write.
--


Aspartame Gate: When Donald Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle

As calls for US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to resign are prompting questions from Senators, about possible breakdowns in the Pentagon chain of command leading to prisoner abuse in Iraq, Betty Martini founder of Mission Possible, an international 'Aspartame resistance' movement, writes to Senator Biden to explain that allowing torture of prisoners in Iraq may not have been the only reprehensible action Rumsfeld should answer for.
--

all the time remembering that "the bastards" are working against us...

The sweet stevia herb has had a long, safe history of use as a food and medicine in South America and Asia, but in many Western countries it is illegal as a food or food additive but legal as a dietary supplement.

It's easy to grow, wonderful as a sweetener, contains medicinal properties, is non-caloric, safe to cook with, and has great potential in agriculture. It's widely used in South America and Asia. So why isn't stevia a household name in the rest of the world?

Julian Whitaker, MD, believes that the FDA "has been after stevia since 1986, coincidental with the growing popularity of aspartame".

According to a 1994 article by Rob McCaleb of the Herb Research Foundation, the FDA began visiting businesses selling stevia around 1987, saying it was an unapproved food additive. One FDA inspector reportedly told a company president that the manufacturer of NutraSweet® had made complaints to the FDA to try to stop the use of stevia.

The Stevita Book-burning Saga

In 1998, the Stevita Company and the US FDA received considerable media attention after it was reported that the FDA had ordered the burning of books sold by Stevita. These contained information on the herb along with stevia recipes.

--

aspartame is the methyl ester of the dipeptide asp-phe. in other words it is made of two amino acids, both of which are found in our bodies, bonded together in the same way amino acids in our body are joined to make things like hormones and proteins.

did you know water is toxic too?

chemical structures:

So, is that why so many people with conditions like fibromyalgia and arthritis get so much worse when they use diet products? I know that amino acid imbalances are a huge issue with fibro.

I think aspartame is unusual for a sweetener in that it's a dipeptide rather than some form or modified carbohydrate (sugar is a carbohydrate). For instance "splenda" is made FROM sugar, just altered to make it indigestible.

sweeteners take a huge variety of shapes and forms. Aspartame, at least theoretically, is one of the least harmful, since it's made from naturally occuring compounds (unlike, for instance, saccharin). The slight danger with aspartame is that one of the amino acids is phenylalanine, which is the one people with PKU, an inbred metabolic condition which means you are unable to metabolise phenylalanine, which, in very high concentrations, is a neurotoxin. This is why you often see the words "contains a source of phenylalanine" on the box.

sorry for the graininess. top left=glucose, top right aspartame, middle=saccharin, bottom left="sucralose" the sweetener in "splenda", bottom right=sucrose, or table sugar

my point was, mate, that the "fda approved" one is harmfull, actually, it kills....and the "fda forbidden" one doesnt, infact its proven to be beneficial, both to humans and the environment.

So, knowing what you know hermann, about how many of these various chemicals affect the body, do you partake of artifical sweeteners?

yes I do. partake in artificial sweeteners, but usually only if i can't get the real thing :0)

as for stretch's point (please dont call me mate). i'm sure stevia has its own hazards. the problem is until something is brought into mass use studies the size of those which are carried out on things like aspartame cannot occur.

My diabetic father would be dead today if not for artificial sweeteners because he's too stubborn to give up his beloved Coca Cola...

actually, stevia is in mass use in Japan, making up 40% of their artificial sweetener market. Wiki has a neat entry on it. What I find most interesting, is how stevia is still a morphed glucose molecule. It's just a plant that morphs it, instead of a human. You'd probably find the article on there very interesting Hermann.

steviol is attached to three or four glucose units. I suppose those units must be strongly bound to the steviol unit to avoid it being digestible (as it has "no calorific value"). Steviol vaguely resembles a steroid in structure

I accept everyone as a friend/mate till they prove otherwise, hermy

well some of the stuff you've said previously has made me come to the decision you're no friend of mine. At least this one might be true and isnt harmful to anyone.

In 2006, the -- (WHO) performed a thorough evaluation of recent experimental studies of stevia extracts conducted on animals and humans, and concluded that "stevioside and rebaudioside A are not genotoxic in vitro or in vivo and that the genotoxicity of steviol and some of its oxidative derivatives in vitro is not expressed in vivo."-- The report also found no evidence of carcinogenic activity. The report also suggested the possibility of health benefits, in that "stevioside has shown some evidence of pharmacological effects in patients with hypertension or with type-2 diabetes"--, but concluded that further study was required to determine proper dosage.

--

and it has them funny diagrams too, hermy