Re: Iran under Sanction Pressures – Reaction?
Feb 7th, 2012
Why is it when the US sneezes, the rest of the world apologizes.
I'm with Iran all the way.
Do you think the US shot this jet down deliberately?
--
| View Poll Results: Oil Sanction | |||
| Is the West right to impose sanctions -Morally -Legally |
|
5 | 29.41% |
| Is the West wrong to impose sanctions-Morally -Legally |
|
4 | 23.53% |
| Will this cause War |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| Will this force/persuade Iran to negotiate Nuke Program |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| Iran will find other markets-India-China etc |
|
7 | 41.18% |
| This will lower the price for Iranian Oil exports |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| Is this a positive step by the West |
|
7 | 41.18% |
| Is this a negative step by the West |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||

Why is it when the US sneezes, the rest of the world apologizes.
I'm with Iran all the way.

eao - Israel
Goober - Iran
Seems to be a correlation here somewhere.
There is a simple solution - stop threatening and bullying and Iran would not need nukes. If the west got rid of their nukes, nobody would need them to protect themselves from the west. But, I guess it is too simple for war mongers to grasp.

The US is worried that if Iran has nuclear power it may attack Israel for the "sucker punch" it gave Iran a while back when it bombed Iran's facilities. So what? They should be worried. That's what happens when you attack another country, you worry that it will eventually get new technology. The lesson learned is to mind your own business and then no one will want to get even.
Remember too the US navy shooting down Iran's commercial liner by the USS Vincenze a while back and they tried to cover up the fact the frigate was in Iranian waters.
I'm with Iran all the way.

Comparing me to EAO is really low.No one will bomb Iran, but they can keep sanctions in place.Think of it as a N Korea in the worlds hot spot for conflict.
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
Obama Seeks to Cool War Fever While Keeping Up Pressure on Iran | Global Spin | TIME.com
Nobody likely envies the challenge President Barack Obama faces getting his “messaging” right on Iran. He must meet the demands of election-year politics and continue to press Tehran’s back to the wall over its nuclear program, all the while avoiding the eruption of a major new Middle East war.
In an NBC interview that aired Sunday, Obama sought to apply a cold compress to the fever of war hysteria that broke out in the media last week over a report that his own Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, believes Israel will start a war with Iran by launching air strikes on its nuclear facilities before June. The Washington Post’s David Ignatius reported the views attributed to Panetta, and the media frenzy intensified when Panetta pointedly declined to confirm or deny the report.
Obama, by contrast, told NBC’s Matt Lauer he didn’t believe that “Israel has made a decision over what they need to do” on the Iran issue, and vowed that “we are going to make sure that we work in lockstep as we proceed to try and solve this, hopefully...

As with Bush, Obama is stuck with his advisory staff to feed him information (disinformation) and has to make decisions based on that. That he surrounded himself with Bush's advisers tells me that there is something fishy in the White House and it don't swim in the sea. Can you say WMDs?

And countless people from the Pentagon stated time and again that bombing Iran would cause more problems and long term. Is there something about those statements that you are missing. When Obama states all options are on the table, I along with many do not see bombing Iran as an option. This is an election year in both countries.
Even an Iran with Nukes cannot close the straits. Use of nukes against NATO would result in a massive retaliation.

And countless people from the Pentagon stated time and again that bombing Iran would cause more problems and long term. Is there something about those statements that you are missing. When Obama states all options are on the table, I along with many do not see bombing Iran as an option. This is an election year in both countries.
Even an Iran with Nukes cannot close the straits. Use of nukes against NATO would result in a massive retaliation.

eao - Israel
Goober - Iran
Seems to be a correlation here somewhere.
There is a simple solution - stop threatening and bullying and Iran would not need nukes. If the west got rid of their nukes, nobody would need them to protect themselves from the west. But, I guess it is too simple for war mongers to grasp.

Cliffy - I found your comparison to myself and EAO deeply insulting. While you and I do disagree on a number of life's situations I have never run from answering, I have never in my opinion lied to you. I have always when wrong, yes plain old wrong admitted such and manned up and accepted it.
To compare me to EAO was extremely insulting. Just my humble opinion. How you take this is up to you.
Lastly I am not a warmonger.

Why is it when the US sneezes, the rest of the world apologizes.
Gimme a break. Can't you see what's happening? Iran wants to go nuclear because hydro power is not a viable option. The US is worried that if Iran has nuclear power it may attack Israel for the "sucker punch" it gave Iran a while back when it bombed Iran's facilities. So what? They should be worried. That's what happens when you attack another country, you worry that it will eventually get new technology. The lesson learned is to mind your own business and then no one will want to get even.
Remember too the US navy shooting down Iran's commercial liner by the USS Vincenze a while back and they tried to cover up the fact the frigate was in Iranian waters.
I'm with Iran all the way.

Cliffy - I found your comparison to myself and EAO deeply insulting. While you and I do disagree on a number of life's situations I have never run from answering, I have never in my opinion lied to you. I have always when wrong, yes plain old wrong admitted such and manned up and accepted it.
To compare me to EAO was extremely insulting. Just my humble opinion. How you take this is up to you.
Lastly I am not a warmonger.

Let me see, all the fukups this fellow had and you think this was a Mossad Op.Doubt it.