TheGuy's repeating theme Threads, that're all on the same tangent, merged here.
- Thread starter TheGuy
- Start date
I refuse to participate until you either apologiose for your false accusations in your post, post #702. Or post proof of those accusations.
Re: The TRUTH..
Your comments are irrelevant to the topic and are also your irrelevant opinions..
It is also posted with the primary intent of provoking a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion..
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2] In addition to the offending poster, the noun troll can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in "that was an excellent troll you posted". While the term troll and its associated action trolling are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective, with trolling being used to describe intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. For example, recent media accounts have used the term troll to describe "a person who defaces internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."[3][4]
Your comments are irrelevant to the topic and are also your irrelevant opinions..
It is also posted with the primary intent of provoking a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion..
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2] In addition to the offending poster, the noun troll can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in "that was an excellent troll you posted". While the term troll and its associated action trolling are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective, with trolling being used to describe intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. For example, recent media accounts have used the term troll to describe "a person who defaces internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."[3][4]
Re: The TRUTH..
Why can't you understand that?
Per say, but in the end we're speaking the truth.
Not at all. I posted my comment to inform anyone else of what is instore for them, if they attempt to actually engage you in a conversation.
Again, I don't deny being a cannibal troll.
Why can't you understand that?
Re: The TRUTH..
My intent is to have reasonable discussion with logical and reasoned arguments that provide logical evidence of the TRUTH claims that I make..
I welcome disagreements that are founded on logical evidence and will offer reasonable logical counter arguments..
Any post that is a mere devaluing of ME or my claims with NO LOGICAL EVIDANCE and only implications of your own moral and intellectual superiority are nothing more the irrelevant insults intended to provoke other users into a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. this is by definition TROLLING..
My intent is to have reasonable discussion with logical and reasoned arguments that provide logical evidence of the TRUTH claims that I make..
I welcome disagreements that are founded on logical evidence and will offer reasonable logical counter arguments..
Any post that is a mere devaluing of ME or my claims with NO LOGICAL EVIDANCE and only implications of your own moral and intellectual superiority are nothing more the irrelevant insults intended to provoke other users into a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. this is by definition TROLLING..
So is it presumptuous on your part to say that Bear is an asshole, I am stupid and others are liars because you disagree with our opinions?
Are your opinions about the existence of god based on fact or truth or are they just your opinion and are as worthless or valuable as anybody else's?
Re: The TRUTH..
Correction, presume.
I tried that, you simply dismissed it without any counter argument.
So is what you do.
Even though he is right, lol.
And I hate to be a sticky wicket and all, but it's a capital "A", lmao!!!
Re: The TRUTH..
This is posted without any logical evidance..and is an unreasonable statement of conjecture..
Your comment is irrelevant to the topic and is also your irrelevant opinion..
It is also posted with the primary intent of provoking a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion..
This is FALSE however I will offer the same argument and you will no doubt refuse to take part in a reasonable discussion..
Explain to me what presumptuousness is...
Then
Explain to me what FAITH in the religious sense is..
and then let us compare..
Is it TRUE that a person can have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that if one assumes that it is absolutely TRUE that God exists without proof, that they have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that you are refusing to have any reasonable discussion..
This is posted without any logical evidance..and is an unreasonable statement of conjecture..
Your comment is irrelevant to the topic and is also your irrelevant opinion..
It is also posted with the primary intent of provoking a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion..
This is FALSE however I will offer the same argument and you will no doubt refuse to take part in a reasonable discussion..
Explain to me what presumptuousness is...
Then
Explain to me what FAITH in the religious sense is..
and then let us compare..
Is it TRUE that a person can have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that if one assumes that it is absolutely TRUE that God exists without proof, that they have a presumptuous opinion..
Is it TRUE that you are refusing to have any reasonable discussion..