How is jus sanguinis better? Do you approve of the 1980s German "guest worker" laws for Turks, that basically said "You can come here and work, pay taxes, participate in society, raise children, but you will never be a citizen, and neither will your great-greatgrandchildren."In fact we are with the US as being the only 2 developed countries to have these outdated jus soli rules.
Australia and the UK require at least one parent to be a citizen, other countries
in Europe are far more restrictive.
It would be easy to change from jus soli to jus sanguinis, and this problem would be solved.
Any idea of the numbers on this alleged problem? I asked earlier, but nobody answered.
How is jus sanguinis better? Do you approve of the 1980s German "guest worker" laws for Turks, that basically said "You can come here and work, pay taxes, participate in society, raise children, but you will never be a citizen, and neither will your great-greatgrandchildren."
Ireland passed its jus soli citizenship to assure Brits in Ireland after the War of Independence that they wouldn't be summarily thrown out after generations of their families had made Ireland home. The U.S. Fourteenth Amendment's citizenship provisions served multiple purposes:
They assured Confederates that they wouldn't lose citizenship.
They assured minorities that the Southern states wouldn't be able to deny state citizenship.
They assured immigrants that they wouldn't be like the Turks in Germany, never able to call the U.S. home.
Maybe such assurances are outdated. There is certainly a push in the developed world to raise the drawbridge, pull up the ladder, and let in only selected, high-skill immigrants, and subject them and their families for generations to come to summary deportation at the convenience of the country. I'm just not sure I think it's a great idea to tell heads-up, hardworking people they would never belong, but the shiftless garbage who happened to be born to families that have been here awhile are sovereign citizens.
Any idea of the numbers on this alleged problem? I asked earlier, but nobody answered.
How did you 'earn' your citizenship? I'll be honest. I didn't earn it. I inherited it from my mother.
I bet that is the case for the majority in these forums.
Woulda been way shorter to just say "No idea."The suggestion forwarded is a policy suggestion. The numbers really have a limited role to play in it
I know the history of the Gastarbeiter program. And I told you how it turned out.The Gastarbeiter program was created in the 50's.
Turks started coming 1960.
It was supposed to be come, work a couple years, go home. No wives, no kids, no nothing.
It was the Germans who mucked up in the 70's, by not booting the workers home.
When you make a categorical statement like that, a single example to the contrary explodes your assertion. Here it comes. . .The Turks have absolutely not integrated into Germany. At all. Zero.
I'm aware of that, thanks.Germany changed their laws in 2000 to allow the Turks born in Germany to have citizenship.
Your categories make no sense. Your proposal would lead to good, hardworking, productive, participating Canadians unable to be citizens, while worthless garbage get citizenship when they are not and will never be anything but a drag and a drain on Canada.Your other examples occurred in a time when it was not possible to hop on a plane and fly
into a developed country to drop a kid. And that it why the rules should be changed.
Too many people treat citizenship as a joke to be scammed.
In that case, do you not have bigger fish to fry?ok... The total umber is 16
Still having trouble controlling discharge of implications and assumptions into your streams and waterways? You really need to step up enforcement on that.Implications and assumptions are dangerous waters to swim in
How is jus sanguinis better? Do you approve of the 1980s German "guest worker" laws for Turks, that basically said "You can come here and work, pay taxes, participate in society, raise children, but you will never be a citizen, and neither will your great-greatgrandchildren."
I know the history of the Gastarbeiter program. And I told you how it turned out.
Your categories make no sense. Your proposal would lead to good, hardworking, productive, participating Canadians unable to be citizens, while worthless garbage get citizenship when they are not and will never be anything but a drag and a drain on Canada.
And while you are busy slagging off normal Canadians, I might remind you that the worthless white trash did a pretty
job of destroying your chosen brothers.
So I guess that makes you worse than worthless white trash, amiright ?
I figure in your mind, any non-white is worse than worthless white trash. You show all the signs.So I guess that makes you worse than worthless white trash, amiright ?
Still having trouble controlling discharge of implications and assumptions into your streams and waterways? You really need to step up enforcement on that.
I figure.
I'm not slagging off normal Canadians. I'm slagging off useless welfare absorbers. Are you denying that Canada has them?.
Every nation has a few; it all depends on how much you enjoy a life of poverty.