Re: RE: Why
LadyC said:
Would you refuse to eat in any restaurant because of your experiences in the one?
No, I wouldn't go back to *that* restaurant because of my experience there. (replace restaurant with province in my examples).
LadyC said:
They didn't refuse to go back to "an area"... they refused to work in 2 entire provinces because of what they called racism.
2 provinces could be considered "an area". Heck 3 provinces could be considered an area too
Maybe racism isn't the right word... I don't know, and frankly I don't care. To judge an entire group of people based on the idiocy of a few is wrong, regardless of what you want to call it.[/quote]
I see your point, but to me, that is not racism... as there was no indication of one race/group/whatever being superior/inferior to another.
I think the word you are looking for is "Prejudice".
Here the definition I found on the Internet:
"Prejudice is, as the name implies, the process of "pre-judging" something. In general, it implies coming to a judgement on the subject before learning where the preponderance of the evidence actually lies....Sometimes this is a matter of fallaciously extending one's own experience to the general case. In other cases, it may be a matter of early education; those taught that certain attitudes are the "correct" ones may form opinions without weighing the evidence on both sides of a given question."