What is there on Moon?

[selfsame]

Why did Zionists their ancestors and the contemporary Zionists are like their ancestors who) opposed both of Jesus and Mohammed?

Because Jesus Christ and Prophet Mohammed invited them to every virtue, but because they were (and are) unlucky they opposed them.

And both Jesus Christ (and his apostles) and Prophet Mohammed were victorious over them and defeated them utterly. So away with the Zionists and their ancestors. :thumbright:

 

[Ludlow]

Why did Zionists their ancestors and the contemporary Zionists are like their ancestors who) opposed both of Jesus and Mohammed?

Because Jesus Christ and Prophet Mohammed invited them to every virtue, but because they were (and are) unlucky they opposed them.

And both Jesus Christ (and his apostles) and Prophet Mohammed were victorious over them and defeated them utterly. So away with the Zionists and their ancestors. :thumbright:

Jesus didn't marry a nine year old. Don't put Mewhammed in the same sentence in you don't mind.

 

[selfsame]

Jesus didn't marry a nine year old. Don't put Mewhammed in the same sentence in you don't mind.

You, cunning; you lie and believe your lie then insist on it.
Like your friend the voracious eater of burger. :laughing6:

 

[MHz]

Fascinating. I'll tell the boys down at the tracks at dinner tonight

Hobo on a bun?

Jesus didn't marry a nine year old. Don't put Mewhammed in the same sentence in you don't mind.

Paul and the Beloved Disciple often call the Gentiles the convert 'their children'. That would include orphans I assume.

First: Moon has no or little atmosphere, and this makes it exposed to the falling of meteoritic rocks and cosmic dust, without burning in the air as it is the case on our Earth, and in spite of this the Earth receives tons of this cosmic dust every day in addition to the many rocks that fall on it.

Cosmic dust would attracted to the body with the greatest pull and that would be the earth. Perhaps the damage and dust were created as the core of the moon migrated to the near side of the moon and that motion would have resulted in huge volcanoes whose rocks peppered the moon and some of the heavier ones actually made it to the earth. The density of the depressions on the far side of the moon could be a combination of impacts and sinkholes depending on what kind of cone it has. The smoothness if the near side suggests it was an event like the Siberian Traps only as a single event once it started.

Second: Moon generally speaking is cold: it has a cold core, which led to the loss of its gravity, and Moon in its night that lasts about 14 1/2 of our days will lead to the coldness of its surface during this night which will make it vulnerable to the falling of a large number of comets ... which led to the large number of craters on Moon.

The temperature of matter only affects volume it occupies, the gravity it produces is the same at any temperature as the mass does not change.

The near side could have been just as cratered as the far side before the outflows that changed the landscape. On the far side the migration of the core away from the crust would have compressed the land area much like a ripe grape changing into a raisin. Lighter materials in a volcano would circle the moon and crash back down, Heavy metals would have been pulled to the earth and that may or may not have some bearing on where the mines are located (Canadian Shield material)

Third: Its long day of about 14 1/2 of our days without having air or wind .. this will cause the heating of its surface and the dismantling of its mountain rocks: rocks of mountains have its principal constituent the CaCO3 and by the direst sun heat .. CO2 will result + CaO which is a fine powder .. this will slip from the slopes of the mountains of Moon and from its rocks with any bit of quaking or shaking.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed
There is no seismic activity and if the rocks had dusk shaken off there would be piles at the base of the rocks. Choppers flying at a certain height would spread fine dust around and there would be no piles at the base of the outcrops of rocks. The big rock does have some finer gravel near the base of the rock and that would need wind to sort it by weight.
No moisture but footy prints compact the dust as if it was wet beach sand rather than the dry stuff it is supposed to be.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed

Fourth: the falling of a large number of comets on Moon specially during its night time when it will be very cold .. these comets when fall on mountains will smash the rocks of mountains, leading to the large amounts of sand.

And that impact would cause the dust to fall as rain does on the earth, it covers everything evenly when it falls.

I add in addition, that the effect of direct sun heat during the day of Moon which lasts for about 14 1/2 of our days, such heat (and particularly without air or wind) will lead to the dismantling of rocks so that it will be fluffy like wool .. this may be a terminal outcome on Moon rocks as will it be on Earth rocks of mountains due to the loss of the essential substance CaCO3 which causes the solidity of rocks.

For that process to be noticeable water has to get into the cracks as a liquid and then freeze and that is the action that breaks the rocks. Even with the fracturing your describe happening that does not scatter the dust around evenly like a volcano or impact that leaves a mark.

 

[selfsame]

Cosmic dust would attracted to the body with the greatest pull and that would be the earth. Perhaps the damage and dust were created as the core of the moon migrated to the near side of the moon and that motion would have resulted in huge volcanoes whose rocks peppered the moon and some of the heavier ones actually made it to the earth. The density of the depressions on the far side of the moon could be a combination of impacts and sinkholes depending on what kind of cone it has. The smoothness if the near side suggests it was an event like the Siberian Traps only as a single event once it started.

The temperature of matter only affects volume it occupies, the gravity it produces is the same at any temperature as the mass does not change.

The near side could have been just as cratered as the far side before the outflows that changed the landscape. On the far side the migration of the core away from the crust would have compressed the land area much like a ripe grape changing into a raisin. Lighter materials in a volcano would circle the moon and crash back down, Heavy metals would have been pulled to the earth and that may or may not have some bearing on where the mines are located (Canadian Shield material)

[/URL]
There is no seismic activity and if the rocks had dusk shaken off there would be piles at the base of the rocks. Choppers flying at a certain height would spread fine dust around and there would be no piles at the base of the outcrops of rocks. The big rock does have some finer gravel near the base of the rock and that would need wind to sort it by weight.
No moisture but footy prints compact the dust as if it was wet beach sand rather than the dry stuff it is supposed to be.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed

And that impact would cause the dust to fall as rain does on the earth, it covers everything evenly when it falls.

For that process to be noticeable water has to get into the cracks as a liquid and then freeze and that is the action that breaks the rocks. Even with the fracturing your describe happening that does not scatter the dust around evenly like a volcano or impact that leaves a mark.

These are a very large number of points of consideration.
So I may answer about some of them now and may be others later on.

I agree there is no seismic activity: logical, because no heat in the core, no liquids or gases to cause such seismic activity.

Some of my points are based on deduction and some of them may be my own presumption, while others I derived from the inspired interpreter.

I agree also the dust may fall on the object with greatest pull: the sun more than the earth, the earth more than the moon, but also the moon with its circling around the earth is exposed to this cosmic dust which is dispersed in the space the remnant of destroyed past planets.)

But there isn't anything like the migration of the moon core.

Moreover, the other side of the Moon is unseen to us on earth, but it is like the seen side: it is exposed to the day and night of the moon in the same way; but to us we see only one half on which the phases of the moon are manifested like the full moon and the crescent ..etc.

The other invisible side also has day and night in the same way as the visible side (to us.)

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Appearances_of_the_Moon_

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Phases_of_the_Moon_

 

[spaminator]

the moon is actually a secret space station.

 

[Curious Cdn]

the moon is actually a secret space station.

SHHHHHHHHH!

That's a secret!

 

[Blackleaf]

the moon is actually a secret space station.

It's a gigantic alien ship. It's well known to be hollow.

 

[MHz]

It's a gigantic alien ship. It's well known to be hollow.

Not the only thing around that is hollow. Don't make me have to explain that.

These are a very large number of points of consideration.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Phases_of_the_Moon_

That is all I have on the moon and as far as the Bible goes it doesn't play a huge role but it does mark the first body that is in the 2nd heaven meaning men should be able to make it into a version of the garden once the new earth verses kick in.

 

[Gilgamesh]

Green cheese

Moon dust & moon rocks.

 

[Gilgamesh]

Hobo on a bun?


Paul and the Beloved Disciple often call the Gentiles the convert 'their children'. That would include orphans I assume.


Cosmic dust would attracted to the body with the greatest pull and that would be the earth. Perhaps the damage and dust were created as the core of the moon migrated to the near side of the moon and that motion would have resulted in huge volcanoes whose rocks peppered the moon and some of the heavier ones actually made it to the earth. The density of the depressions on the far side of the moon could be a combination of impacts and sinkholes depending on what kind of cone it has. The smoothness if the near side suggests it was an event like the Siberian Traps only as a single event once it started.



The temperature of matter only affects volume it occupies, the gravity it produces is the same at any temperature as the mass does not change.

The near side could have been just as cratered as the far side before the outflows that changed the landscape. On the far side the migration of the core away from the crust would have compressed the land area much like a ripe grape changing into a raisin. Lighter materials in a volcano would circle the moon and crash back down, Heavy metals would have been pulled to the earth and that may or may not have some bearing on where the mines are located (Canadian Shield material)

[/URL]
There is no seismic activity and if the rocks had dusk shaken off there would be piles at the base of the rocks. Choppers flying at a certain height would spread fine dust around and there would be no piles at the base of the outcrops of rocks. The big rock does have some finer gravel near the base of the rock and that would need wind to sort it by weight.
No moisture but footy prints compact the dust as if it was wet beach sand rather than the dry stuff it is supposed to be.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#Mountains_Will_Be_Dispersed

And that impact would cause the dust to fall as rain does on the earth, it covers everything evenly when it falls.



For that process to be noticeable water has to get into the cracks as a liquid and then freeze and that is the action that breaks the rocks. Even with the fracturing your describe happening that does not scatter the dust around evenly like a volcano or impact that leaves a mark.

Idiot

 

[Danbones]

Moon dust & moon rocks.

BULLSH!T!

Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake​

A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sc...y-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

Every one knows the moon landings actually happened so obviously the moon is made out of something else.

 

[Curious Cdn]

Sorry. There is no bullshit on the moon.