Have university students and administration all become idiots?
Case 1
Carleton University student gov't cancels "Shine-o-rama" support for Cystic Fibrosis......because it is non-inclusive, and "only affect(s) white people, and primarily men"
OK. Now. Can one imagine if this was the opposite.....say a cancelation of support for research into sickle-cell anemia because it affects only blacks????? Absolutely outrageous in every way. As Margaret Wente says in today's Globe and Mail column, it is only acceptable to abuse white males this way...........
Now here is the kicker.........CF affects mostly children, in fact it hits both genders alike, it is very often much worse in girls, and it is far from restricted to blue-eyed devils.
Idiots.
Case 2.
Queen's University adminstrators have hired student "dialogue monitors" to literally eavesdrop on conversations among students that might be racist, sexist, classist or ability-ist. (Isn't life ability-ist???) Anyway, I digress.
The monitors' job is to (I'm not kidding here) "facilitate non-blameful reflection on issues of social identity, with the aim of promoting a lasting experience of inclusive community and shared humanity"
(I'd like to "socially identify" whomever wrote that line of PC oppression, and hang them by their naughty bits, thus "promoting a lasting experience" )
Down with the Thought Police
But I digress again.
In my mind, the only acceptable reponse to being interupted by one of the Monstrous Monitors would be a hearty "f*&k off" followed by reflection on their immediate ancestry, their lack of intellectual ability, and their tendency towards controlism, leavened with some thoughtful advice on maintaining their current level of health (get the f*^k away from me)
Reminds me of my very good friend, who teaches history at UNB-SJ. In the early 90s, he was handed (with all other professors) a three-page list of words no longer acceptable in the classroom....you know, words like "indian". Anyway, his greatest complaint was that the list was so extensive that he could only work the first page into his next lecture.
Defiance counts.
Thoughts?
Case 1
Carleton University student gov't cancels "Shine-o-rama" support for Cystic Fibrosis......because it is non-inclusive, and "only affect(s) white people, and primarily men"
OK. Now. Can one imagine if this was the opposite.....say a cancelation of support for research into sickle-cell anemia because it affects only blacks????? Absolutely outrageous in every way. As Margaret Wente says in today's Globe and Mail column, it is only acceptable to abuse white males this way...........
Now here is the kicker.........CF affects mostly children, in fact it hits both genders alike, it is very often much worse in girls, and it is far from restricted to blue-eyed devils.
Idiots.
Case 2.
Queen's University adminstrators have hired student "dialogue monitors" to literally eavesdrop on conversations among students that might be racist, sexist, classist or ability-ist. (Isn't life ability-ist???) Anyway, I digress.
The monitors' job is to (I'm not kidding here) "facilitate non-blameful reflection on issues of social identity, with the aim of promoting a lasting experience of inclusive community and shared humanity"
(I'd like to "socially identify" whomever wrote that line of PC oppression, and hang them by their naughty bits, thus "promoting a lasting experience" )
Down with the Thought Police
But I digress again.
In my mind, the only acceptable reponse to being interupted by one of the Monstrous Monitors would be a hearty "f*&k off" followed by reflection on their immediate ancestry, their lack of intellectual ability, and their tendency towards controlism, leavened with some thoughtful advice on maintaining their current level of health (get the f*^k away from me)
Reminds me of my very good friend, who teaches history at UNB-SJ. In the early 90s, he was handed (with all other professors) a three-page list of words no longer acceptable in the classroom....you know, words like "indian". Anyway, his greatest complaint was that the list was so extensive that he could only work the first page into his next lecture.
Defiance counts.
Thoughts?