Ask yourself where all the polticians end up after there done in parliment ?Heads of big corporations .See a pattern scratch my back and I'll scratch yours :evil:
MMMike said:uh... if its not broke don't fix it! People living in democratic, capitalist countries (I'll even include Canada on that list) enjoy an unparalleled standard of living. Wealth unimagianable to most people in the world. Communism doesn't work: the lessons of the past century have proved that.
Do you mean bobbing about in the greasy waters of New Orleans for a fortnight or two because they had the effrontery to become sick, poor, or old?MMMike said:... People living in democratic, capitalist countries . . . enjoy an unparalleled standard of living. . . .
GL Schmitt said:Do you mean bobbing about in the greasy waters of New Orleans for a fortnight or two because they had the effrontery to become sick, poor, or old?MMMike said:... People living in democratic, capitalist countries . . . enjoy an unparalleled standard of living. . . .
Uh, these people were told to evacuate the city but they elected to stay and take their chances. What the hell does that have to do with capitalism vs communism. I guess no hurricanes hit communist countries?? Confused Compared to the entire third world and the second, the poorest of the poor in the US or Canada still have it pretty good. Even the poor have cable tv, phone, running water etc...
MMMike said:GL Schmitt said:Do you mean bobbing about in the greasy waters of New Orleans for a fortnight or two because they had the effrontery to become sick, poor, or old?MMMike said:... People living in democratic, capitalist countries . . . enjoy an unparalleled standard of living. . . .
Uh, these people were told to evacuate the city but they elected to stay and take their chances. What the hell does that have to do with capitalism vs communism. I guess no hurricanes hit communist countries?? :? Compared to the entire third world and the second, the poorest of the poor in the US or Canada still have it pretty good. Even the poor have cable tv, phone, running water etc...
Andygal said:Uh, these people were told to evacuate the city but they elected to stay and take their chances. What the hell does that have to do with capitalism vs communism. I guess no hurricanes hit communist countries?? Confused Compared to the entire third world and the second, the poorest of the poor in the US or Canada still have it pretty good. Even the poor have cable tv, phone, running water etc...
Some of those people had no POSSIBLE WAY to get clear of the city in time. No car, no money for a bus or a taxi etc etc. They didn't have near enogh warning to evacuate on foot and nowhere to go if they did. We are talking about dirt poor people. People like that can't afford to just up and walk away on a moments notice. And did anybody send free transportation to the poor areas of the city in advance of the hurricane, I don't think they did. They left these people who couldn't possibly help themselves on their own.
MMMike said:uh... if its not broke don't fix it! People living in democratic, capitalist countries (I'll even include Canada on that list) enjoy an unparalleled standard of living. Wealth unimagianable to most people in the world. Communism doesn't work: the lessons of the past century have proved that.
Do you really think governments can be more efficient than the private sector at doing these things?
This is why tax brakes to small and medium size buisnesses work much better at building your economy then throwing our hard earned money at these massive coperation.
It would be so much better to use this money to cut the business tax rates across the board.
uh... if its not broke don't fix it!
Reverend Blair said:Tax cuts for the wealthy and for multinational corporations tend to take money out of the economy. All that yarking about investment does not hold up because the capital tends to go south. Give the tax breaks to the middle class on down.
MMMike said:Churchill said of democracy: It is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. IMO same goes for free-market capitalism. Sure, there are downsides (particularly of the new capitalism/globalism): widening gap between rich & poor, uncertainty and turmoil, loss of stability etc... but on the whole the overall wealth of society increases. The more you try to smooth out the bumps (by income redistribution, trade barriers or tough labour laws), the more you slow down the 'machine' and the overall wealth decreases.