US war-murdered 20-30 million people since WW2

[MHz]

Yeah, but the reasons for entering the war the second time (WMD and 9/11 Collusion) were fabricated...

As was Gulf I if the slant drilling accusations were correct.

 

[The Old Medic]

They were NOT correct, the reason why we went into Iraq was because they had occupied Kuwait.

You REALLY love to toss around those anti-American theories, don't you Ocean? I'll bet you admire the old Soviet Union and Communist China in the 50's-80's.

 

[MHz]

Just more of the same old anti-American bull manure!

As the saying goes, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. If 'mistakes' (killing millions is always intentional) were made and they aren't pointed out by an even stronger force (civilians always will win because the military only has so many bullets)

Korea, the war was started by North Korean (and the Soviets).

So say the victors, great R&D area for the new jets that had just been made. When the Brits were forced out of India and Afghanistan the border was put in a place that was sure to cause hard feelings and it has for all those years at the profit of the businesses who make war machines and that isn't either of the two countries that are closest to the action. Sweet deal for the Brits as they supply the expensive equipment to both sides.

Vietnam, we had a treaty with the Republic of Vietnam (S. Vietnam), which we kept.

The false-flag has already been exposed, people don't do sneaky things when they know they are on moral ground. The best way to do what you want is to be the boss over an immoral group. Then you can murder innocents without having to9 lie about what is going on. That also lets them use the same ploy repeatedly, which they do. If the choice of which is better to be ruled by is between a murderer or a liar and a murderer most would choose just the murderer
.

Iraq, the ONLY problem with Iraq was that we should have finished the job the first time.

The invasion could have avoided if the well-bores could have been inspected and even just samples taken to show no cross drilling was taking place. M. Albright even gave Saddam the green light when she said the US would see it as a domestic disturbance and Saddam had just battled Iran just to get in good with the US, who would have thunk a double cross was in the works? After all, dogs are rabid not nations.

Afghanistan, we gave them every chance to hand over Osama bin Ladin, and they refused. Besides, this truly was a cooperative effort, and still is. There were excellent grounds to kick out the Taliban, simply because of their treatment of women, and they destruction of world class historical settings.

No they offered to, they wanted proof of involvement first. In the war model that was repeated with Iraq, a demand and when it was met a new demand was put in place ect until invasion was justified because they were getting no co-operation in all the demands.
Jimmy Carter signed on to the plan to install the Taliban's predecessor some 6 months before the USSR came in. They did things like throw acid in the faces of women who dared do such things as bare their faces in public. That same Taliban was given a tour of Texas not even a year before that so their treatment of women had nothing to do with anything, that was a non issue for the US, after all they do train 'death squads', I'll spare you the details of where they got their training?

And I really hate to break it to the Jew baiter, MHz, but the Rothchild's have absolutely nothing to do with the wars of the past 100 years. Only Neo-Nazi's would believe that they did.

So a Jewish banker is free from any accountability and a Christian banker could be tossed into a volcano if that is what the peasants wanted? How about a crooked Jewish banker? Christians are the product of a set of writing who had Jewish authors, that makes us 'relatives' as we are called 'their children'. that part is not recognized by Jews or Jewish bankers. The RCC gave up banking because they could not overcharge usury fees on their own flock and that is using OT usury laws, passing it off to the Jews did not solve the problem as Jews are the 'parents' of anybody who had heard of the God of the Holy Bible. If a Jew is falling away should not the other Jews point out that mistake? Certainly worked on Judge Goldstone, so much remorse that he did a double apology.

Oh yes, Ocean Breeze, even if you were correct (and you are not), how do you justify the well over 20 million Soviet citizens murdered by Stalin, or the over 50 million Chinese citizens murdered by Mao? By the standards you claim, the USA would be real pikers in the murdering of people game compared to the Communists.

Don't have to, nobody complained as that was the normal way of taking care of things like overpopulation and political opponents. 6 million Ukrainians were starved to death after 1930 and nobody complained, North America had just finished their genocide program on the Indians so why would they suddenly tell other countries they had to not do the same thing. Not a pretty picture but it is more accurate than the bull**** on presented to the public. If that killed descent from the public (it didn't as the revolt was still sticks against tanks and the stick won, as they always will when push comes to shove.

And then, there are all of the wars in Asia, Africa, South America, etc that have been financed, and armed by the Soviets and Chinese. And of course, the Arab armies that have had their collective asses kicked by Israel repeatedly were primarily armed by the Soviet Union.

And then what, abandoned so International Corporation can come in and take the valuables without paying full price of what it is worth, that is so their profits can be 25% instead of 5% and the local get a better home life instead of the armies whose main weapon is the machete.

Maybe, those Arab countries should sue the Russians, for the deaths of all of their soldiers and airmen (estimated to be around 75,000) because of the defective and 3rd rate Soviet weapons that were sold to them?

You make it sound like it was an accident. You will notice that the Arabs didn't have any regular tank drivers before they were attacked, was that part of their invasion tactic, don't train anybody to run the surplus machines left over from WWII compared to new equipment built for combat in 1970 era? That is how a banker works, two opponents where one is just slightly stronmger but never fully stronger that conclict ends (with any hope if you are a banker and that is a commercial entity so being a Jew doesn't help or hinder performance, having a profit of 0% is the goal because it is supposed to be a servant of the people rather than the other way around, that is what you are cheering and it's corrupt as far as being fair and that is intention so a crook is a crook.