Unmistakable Message DU Kills

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
An Unmistakeable Message. Depleted Uranium kills our troops
The Montana DU Project

By Martin J. Kidston

Global Research, March 9, 2007
Helena Independent Record - 2007-03-06





The words are bright and unmistakeable, sitting high above Montana Avenue on the latest flashy billboard.

“Depleted uranium kills our troops,” the message says, depicting an Abrams tank firing its cannon, along with a warning for “ionizing radiation.”

The billboard doesn’t mention the Helena Peace Seekers, a local anti-war group that has called the current conflict “immoral and unjust.”

It does, however, list the group’s new subsidiary, the Montana Depleted Uranium Project, which hopes to use the billboard to raise public awareness on the use of DU, which it says threatens the health of both U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians.

“We have DU munitions being used by the military that are endangering our own troops,” said Chip Clawson, a Vietnam-era veteran who’s funding the billboard. “These radioactive weapons are certain to devastate the future health of many troops and many civilians in the countries where we’ve used them.”

The group’s members also want veterans returning from the war to get screened for the presence of uranium.

House Bill 288 sought to provide members of the Montana National Guard with a DU health screening upon returning home. The bill was tabled due to funding questions.

Clawson said the group has no current evidence that DU has adversely affected the health of any particular Montana soldier home from Iraq or Afghanistan. However, he said, he believes that will change in time.

“I have had some possibilities, but we’ve been unable to produce them,” Clawson said. “We have an incredibly high rate of veterans from the first Gulf War on disability. We believe DU is part of the problem.”

The Department of Veterans Affairs said DU possesses about 60 percent of the radioactivity of natural uranium. It poses a hazard if internalized, be it though shrapnel or inhalation.

Testing DU for military use began in the 1960s. The material was first used in combat by the U.S. in the first Gulf War.

Joe Foster, administrator of the Montana Veterans Affairs Division, said that in the four years the current war has been going on, no veteran health-care provider has filed a claim naming DU as the cause of illness.

“I sent out a memo a month ago, asking them if they’ve processed any claim based upon depleted uranium,” Foster said. “There were none. It doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened to any of our soldiers. It’s just that we haven’t seen it here in Montana.”

Even so, Foster said the VA will place information on its Website about DU, particularly the three levels of exposure, which range from being hit by a DU round to being in the general area of a DU incident.

While veterans presented with level-one or level-two exposure to DU have that exposure documented in their medical records, those who experience a level-three exposure do not.

“I think what this group wants is to have anyone and everyone in theater tested for DU automatically,” Foster said. “That just can’t happen unless they want to pay for it themselves.”

The link on Clawson’s billboard sends viewers to the Gulf War Veterans Association.

According to the group’s own mission, its single goal is to obtain treatment for veterans who “experience symptoms collectively known as the ‘Gulf War Illness.’”

The group claims that the number of Gulf War veterans suffering from the mysterious illness “has spread to epidemic proportions.” The group also claims that the government has turned its back on the nation’s defenders.

Yet studies question whether the Gulf War Illness is even a real medical condition.

A November 1996 article in the New England Journal of Medicine found no difference in hospitalization rates or self-reported symptoms between Persian Gulf vets and non-Persian Gulf vets.

“U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians have been exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of the use of DU munitions in Iraq,” Clawson said. “But many of our troops haven’t been told about this, nor have they been trained to minimize the long-term health risks.”

Reporter
Martin Kidston can be reached mkidson@helenair.com

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.


 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Longterm I would think postconflict depression kills far more.

Spoken from pure ignorance. Depleted uranium is that uranium which is left over after most of the U-235 has been extracted. DU is almost entirelly U-238. U-238 is a highly toxic substance which is also radioactive. The reason DU is used at all, is it's armour busting atributes, and the fact that the U.S. has a million tons of it just lying around. The stuff goes through conventional armour like the proverbial knife through butter. Problem is that it vapourizes when it hits and any soldier in the area will breath in the radioactive dust and suffer the deadly consequences of getting this poison in his body. Could be friendly, could be enemy....doesn't matter.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
You know this is DEPLETED uranium right? It is LESS radioactive that the sand the soldiers are marching on. Seriously, Desert Sand is fairly radioactive.

Its whats left over when you take everything fissile and radioactive out. Its used because Uranium is incredibley dense, not because it has some radioactive super power. Its residual radiation is relatively harmless compared to other substances, such as lead.

You are more likely to get ill from handling beach sand than you are depleted uranium. Ingesting it is another matter, but what do you think other munitions do?

Vapourised lead? Vapourised Arsenic and all the other heavy metals used in weaponry.
All are far worse.


I know it has the word "Uranium" in it, but don't run into a blind panic. The radioactive stuff is the stuff put into Enriched Uranium, depleted uranium is the crap left over and is usually left in uncovered piles for wind to blow around near mines.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Well we'll just have to wait till the study is complete, twenty or thirty more years of DU, and we'll be able to study it properly.I just thought it might be something impotent to think about in case it comes up in the future. It'll be easier to make science fiction flicks hahahahaha:laughing7:
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Ah face it....WAR kills...it's just a brutal activity that we should do everything and anything to avoid.
That's a good idea, everything I see about it is nasty bussiness. Can't be much fun getting killed. There's quite a bit of lturature that seems to agree with you, all the way back to borg the hairy magnificent one, slayer of the trogliditelicks.Not that anybody pays any attention to those old ideas, conflict resolution hasn't advanced at all like we had hoped it might tsktsk hopefully in the next ten or twenty years we'll study it somemore when we get the time.Seems to be a growing market for the service, might be some money in it if anybody had the time to get something like that to market. I'll have to add that to the list. ha:laughing7:
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
[FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=+2] Depleted Uranium:
Dirty Bombs, Dirty Missiles, Dirty Bullets
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=+1] A death sentence here and abroad [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=+1] by Leuren Moret [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial,helvetica] San Francisco Bay View [/FONT] [FONT=arial,helvetica] 18 August 2004 [/FONT]


[FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1] "Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." -- Henry Kissinger, quoted in Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW's in Vietnam
[/SIZE][/FONT]​
Vietnam was a chemical war for oil, permanently contaminating large regions and countries downriver with Agent Orange, and environmentally the most devastating war in world history. But since 1991, the U.S. has staged four nuclear wars using depleted uranium weaponry, which, like Agent Orange, meets the U.S. government definition of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Vast regions in the Middle East and Central Asia have been permanently contaminated with radiation.
And what about our soldiers? Terry Jemison of the Department of Veterans Affairs reported this week to the American Free Press that "Gulf-era veterans" now on medical disability since 1991 number 518,739, with only 7,035 reported wounded in Iraq in that same 14-year period.
This week the American Free Press dropped a "dirty bomb" on the Pentagon by reporting that eight out of 20 men who served in one unit in the 2003 U.S. military offensive in Iraq now have malignancies. That means that 40 percent of the soldiers in that unit have developed malignancies in just 16 months.
Since these soldiers were exposed to vaccines and depleted uranium (DU) only, this is strong evidence for researchers and scientists working on this issue, that DU is the definitive cause of Gulf War Syndrome. Vaccines are not known to cause cancer. One of the first published researchers on Gulf War Syndrome, who also served in 1991 in Iraq, Dr. András Korényi-Both, is in agreement with Barbara Goodno from the Department of Defense's Deployment Health Support Directorate, that in this war soldiers were not exposed to chemicals, pesticides, bioagents or other suspect causes this time to confuse the issue.
This powerful new evidence is blowing holes in the cover-up perpetrated by the Pentagon and three presidential administrations ever since DU was first used in 1991 in the Persian Gulf War. Fourteen years after the introduction of DU on the battlefield in 1991, the long-term effects have revealed that DU is a death sentence and very nasty stuff.
Scientists studying the biological effects of uranium in the 1960s reported that it targets the DNA. Marion Fulk, a nuclear physical chemist retired from the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab and formerly involved with the Manhattan Project, interprets the new and rapid malignancies in soldiers from the 2003 war as "spectacular, and a matter of concern."
This evidence shows that of the three effects which DU has on biological systems -- radiation, chemical and particulate -- the particulate effect from nano-size particles is the most dominant one immediately after exposure and targets the Master Code in the DNA. This is bad news, but it explains why DU causes a myriad of diseases which are difficult to define.
In simple words, DU "trashes the body." When asked if the main purpose for using it was for destroying things and killing people, Fulk was more specific: "I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people."
Soldiers developing malignancies so quickly since 2003 can be expected to develop multiple cancers from independent causes. This phenomenon has been reported by doctors in hospitals treating civilians following NATO bombing with DU in Yugoslavia in 1998-1999 and the U.S. military invasion of Iraq using DU for the first time in 1991. Medical experts report that this phenomenon of multiple malignancies from unrelated causes has been unknown until now and is a new syndrome associated with internal DU exposure.
Just 467 U.S. personnel were wounded in the three-week Persian Gulf War in 1990-1991. Out of 580,400 soldiers who served in Gulf War I, 11,000 are dead, and by 2000 there were 325,000 on permanent medical disability. This astounding number of disabled vets means that a decade later, 56 percent of those soldiers who served now have medical problems.
The number of disabled vets reported up to 2000 has been increasing by 43,000 every year. Brad Flohr of the Department of Veterans Affairs told American Free Press that he believes there are more disabled vets now than even after World War II.
They brought it home
Not only were soldiers exposed to DU on and off the battlefields, but they brought it home. DU in the semen of soldiers internally contaminated their wives, partners and girlfriends. Tragically, some women in their 20s and 30s who were sexual partners of exposed soldiers developed endometriosis and were forced to have hysterectomies because of health problems.
In a group of 251 soldiers from a study group in Mississippi who had all had normal babies before the Gulf War, 67 percent of their post-war babies were born with severe birth defects. They were born with missing legs, arms, organs or eyes or had immune system and blood diseases. In some veterans' families now, the only normal or healthy members of the family are the children born before the war.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has stated that they do not keep records of birth defects occurring in families of veterans.
How did they hide it?
Before a new weapons system can be used, it must be fully tested. The blueprint for depleted uranium weapons is a 1943 declassified document from the Manhattan Project.
Harvard President and physicist James B. Conant, who developed poison gas in World War I, was brought into the Manhattan Project by the father of presidential candidate John Kerry. Kerry 's father served at a high level in the Manhattan Project and was a CIA agent.
Conant was chair of the S-1 Poison Gas Committee, which recommended developing poison gas weapons from the radioactive trash of the atomic bomb project in World War II. At that time, it was known that radioactive materials dispersed in bombs from the air, from land vehicles or on the battlefield produced very fine radioactive dust which would penetrate all protective clothing, any gas mask or filter or the skin. By contaminating the lungs and blood, it could kill or cause illness very quickly.
They also recommended it as a permanent terrain contaminant, which could be used to destroy populations by contaminating water supplies and agricultural land with the radioactive dust.
The first DU weapons system was developed for the Navy in 1968, and DU weapons were given to and used by Israel in 1973 under U.S. supervision in the Yom Kippur war against the Arabs.
The Phalanx weapons system, using DU, was tested on the USS Bigelow out of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in 1977, and DU weapons have been sold by the U.S. to 29 countries.
Military research report summaries detail the testing of DU from 1974-1999 at military testing grounds, bombing and gunnery ranges and at civilian labs under contract. Today 42 states are contaminated with DU from manufacture, testing and deployment.
Women living around these facilities have reported increases in endometriosis, birth defects in babies, leukemia in children and cancers and other diseases in adults. Thousands of tons of DU weapons tested for decades by the Navy on four bombing and gunnery ranges around Fallon, Nevada, is no doubt the cause of the fastest growing leukemia cluster in the U.S. over the past decade. The military denies that DU is the cause.
The medical profession has been active in the cover-up -- just as they were in hiding the effects from the American public -- of low level radiation from atmospheric testing and nuclear power plants. A medical doctor in Northern California reported being trained by the Pentagon with other doctors, months before the 2003 war started, to diagnose and treat soldiers returning from the 2003 war for mental problems only.
Medical professionals in hospitals and facilities treating returning soldiers were threatened with $10,000 fines if they talked about the soldiers or their medical problems. They were also threatened with jail.
Reporters have also been prevented access to more than 14,000 medically evacuated soldiers flown nightly since the 2003 war in C-150s from Germany who are brought to Walter Reed Hospital near Washington, D.C.
Dr. Robert Gould, former president of the Bay Area chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), has contacted three medical doctors since February 2004, after I had been invited to speak about DU.
  1. Dr. Katharine Thomasson, president of the Oregon chapter of the PSR, informed me that Dr. Gould had contacted her and tried to convince her to cancel her invitation for me to speak about DU at Portland State University on April 12. Although I was able to do a presentation, Dr. Thomasson told me I could only talk about DU in Oregon "and nothing overseas, nothing political."
  2. Dr. Gould also contacted and discouraged Dr. Ross Wilcox in Toronto, Canada, from inviting me to speak to Physicians for Global Survival (PGS), the Canadian equivalent of PSR, several months later.
  3. When that didn't work, he contacted Dr. Allan Connoly, the Canadian national president of PGS, who was able to cancel my invitation and nearly succeeded in preventing Dr. Wilcox, his own member, from showing photos and presenting details on civilians suffering from DU exposure and cancer provided to him by doctors in southern Iraq.
Dr. Janette Sherman, a former and long-standing member of PSR, reported that she finally quit some time after being invited to lunch by a new PSR executive administrator. After the woman had pumped Dr. Sherman for information all through lunch about her position on key issues, the woman informed Dr. Sherman that her last job had been with the CIA.
How was the truth about DU hidden from military personnel serving in successive DU wars? Before his tragic death, Sen. Paul Wellstone informed Joyce Riley, R.N., B.S.N., executive director of the American Gulf War Veterans Association, that 95 percent of Gulf War veterans had been recycled out of the military by 1995. Any of those continuing in military service were isolated from each other, preventing critical information being transferred to new troops. The "next DU war" had already been planned, and those planning it wanted "no skunk at the garden party."
The US has a dirty (DU) little (CIA) secret
A new book just published at the American Free Press by Michael Collins Piper, The High Priests of War: The Secret History of How America's Neo-Conservative Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empire, details the early plans for a war against the Arab world by Henry Kissinger and the neo-cons in the late 1960s and early 1970s. That just happens to coincide with getting the DU "show on the road" and the oil crisis in the Middle East, which caused concern not only to President Nixon. The British had been plotting and scheming for control of the oil in Iraq for decades since first using poison gas on the Iraqis and Kurds in 1912.
The book details the creation of the neo-cons by their "godfather" and Trotsky lover Irving Kristol, who pushed for a "war against terrorism" long before 9/11 and was lavishly funded for years by the CIA. His son, William Kristol, is one of the most influential men in the United States.
Both are public relations men for the Israeli lobby's neo-conservative network, with strong ties to Rupert Murdoch. Kissinger also has ties to this network and the Carlyle Group, who, one could say, have facilitated these omnicidal wars beginning from the time former President Bush took office. It would be easy to say that we are recycling World Wars I and II, with the same faces.
When I asked Vietnam Special Ops Green Beret Capt. John McCarthy, who could have devised this omnicidal plan to use DU to destroy the genetic code and genetic future of large populations of Arabs and Moslems in the Middle East and Central Asia -- just coincidentally the areas where most of the world's oil deposits are located -- he replied: "It has all the handprints of Henry Kissinger."
In Zbignew Brzezinski's book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, the map of the Eurasian chessboard includes four regions strategic to U.S. foreign policy. The "South" region corresponds precisely to the regions now contaminated permanently with radiation from U.S. bombs, missiles and bullets made with thousands of tons of DU.
A Japanese professor, Dr. K. Yagasaki, has calculated that 800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing!
No wonder our soldiers, their families and the people of the Middle East, Yugoslavia and Central Asia are sick. But as Henry Kissinger said after Vietnam when our soldiers came home ill from Agent Orange, "Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used for foreign policy."
Unfortunately, more and more of those soldiers are men and women with brown skin. And unfortunately, the DU radioactive dust will be carried around the world and deposited in our environments just as the "smog of war" from the 1991 Gulf War was found in deposits in South America, the Himalayas and Hawaii.
In June 2003, the World Health Organization announced in a press release that global cancer rates will increase 50 percent by 2020. What else do they know that they aren't telling us? I know that depleted uranium is a death sentence for all of us. We will all die in silent ways.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Juan, interesitng post! Do you have stats on American workers who were involved in the manufacture of any relevant weaponry. Their workers's compensation program must be overwhelmed.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Juan, interesitng post! Do you have stats on American workers who were involved in the manufacture of any relevant weaponry. Their workers's compensation program must be overwhelmed.

The people making DU bullets and DU cannon rounds know what they are dealing with and take the neccessary precautions. The soldiers in the field knew nothing. The UN has been trying to outlaw this filthy poison for years. Do a little research.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
You know this is DEPLETED uranium right? It is LESS radioactive that the sand the soldiers are marching on. Seriously, Desert Sand is fairly radioactive.

Its whats left over when you take everything fissile and radioactive out. Its used because Uranium is incredibley dense, not because it has some radioactive super power. Its residual radiation is relatively harmless compared to other substances, such as lead.

You are more likely to get ill from handling beach sand than you are depleted uranium. Ingesting it is another matter, but what do you think other munitions do?

Vapourised lead? Vapourised Arsenic and all the other heavy metals used in weaponry.
All are far worse.


I know it has the word "Uranium" in it, but don't run into a blind panic. The radioactive stuff is the stuff put into Enriched Uranium, depleted uranium is the crap left over and is usually left in uncovered piles for wind to blow around near mines.

For God's sake Zzarchov do a little reading. The main component of DU is U-238 which is around forty percent as radioactive as U-235 and has a half life of over four billion years. The main reason it is used is that it is 1.7 times as dense as lead and slices through conventional armour like it was butter. It is highly toxic as well as being radioactive and it vaporizes when it hits and the dust is breathed in by anyone nearby. There have been thousands of casualties among U.S. soldiers and somehow it has not been reported as anything but Gulf war syndrome.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Media control must be virtually complete, to be able to suppress the DU story for this long and so completely makes me think about the other storys relegated to rumours and freemongering. Especially the holy towers.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Juan...Uranium 238 isn't that radioactive itself..Uranium 235 is the radioactive bit, its a tiny, tiny fraction , thats why enriching uranium 238 into 235 is so expensive.

Look into it, paper gloves will protect you from any harm, there is no gamma radiation, only alpha levels. It really is on par with the sand in some deserts.

The vapourization is another matter, ingesting ANY vapourized metal is bad for you.

You know whats worse than DU? Vapourized Lead used in many bullets. Vapourized tungsten used in non DU shells, vapourized arsenic used in most missiles.

Do some reading, it is all just panic, playing up on the fact that the organizers know the majority of the public will hear "URANIUM!" in big bold letters and thing a race of radiated super-mutants coming home from war.

Compared the problems with ingesting vapourized lead to vapourized DU.