UK to overtake France and Germany to become Europe's most populous nation by 2050

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
As the UK continues to stagnate economically, and as the number of Muslims cause the population to swell, the two effects will generate a steep decline in quality of life. Continental Europe and other parts of the world will not come to its aid. The UK isn't the only European sewer, but it's fast catching up with the worst of them.

It won't be too long before the UK will lead the pack in being an awkward, smelly Euro-backwater. This is what happens when immigration isn't controlled. Please note that I said 'controlled' and not stopped.

BL, you'd better start taking Arabic lessons so you can fill out the government forms for your old age pension - if such a beastie even exists by the time you reach the magic age.

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
Population density is relative. Most of the UK's population is urban (almost 80%) which means that large areas of Britain are rural or even wilderness. The last time I was in England I was very impressed at the large areas of farmland and forested areas that I drove by. Without it there will be a population decline by 2080 which may or may not be a good thing depending on whether you think a declining population is good for business or better for the environment.

Over 90% of international migrants to the UK go to England which now has a population density of 410 people per square km (see here). The population density of England is just lower than India and nearly twice that of Germany and 3.5 times that of France.

As the article states immigration is the key to maintaining the UK's population. Without it there will be a population decline by 2080.

Good. There are too many people here. The British people want immigration cut, which was a big factor in them voting to leave the EU.

If net migration continues at around recent levels, (net migration has averaged 250,000 in the last ten years) then the population is projected to rise by 500,000 a year and so reach 73 million in the next 15 years. This is the ONS ‘high’ migration scenario of 265,000 per year. This increase of nearly 8 million people is the equivalent of adding the combined population of Greater Manchester and the cities of Birmingham, Glasgow, Liverpool, Leicester, Leeds, Sheffield, Bradford, Nottingham, Portsmouth and Bristol. 75% of this increase would be from future migration and the children of those migrants.

The population growth would not stop there. It would continue to increase towards 80 million in 25 years and keep going upwards.

The vast majority of population growth is projected to occur in England. Of the 9.7 million increase in the UK population projected by 2039 under the principal projection, 9 million, or 92.5% is due to take place in England which will present very significant problems for housing and public services.

Such rapid population growth has severe impacts on the provision of public services such as school places. Similar strains will be placed on infrastructure like the transport network. Roads will have to be widened and new ones built to deal with the extra traffic while overcrowding on the railways will increase. Adequate housing will have to be built to accommodate all the extra people, either by making our urban areas more overcrowded or by building on green field sites with the loss of valuable amenities like beautiful countryside and productive farmland. Already, in recent years most additional heads of households have been born abroad.

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/key-topics/population


 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Over 90% of international migrants to the UK go to England which now has a population density of 410 people per square km (see here). The population density of England is just lower than India and nearly twice that of Germany and 3.5 times that of France.

I quite understand it - it is known as simple density - simply divide the population by the area. However, if 80% of the population is living in just 5% of the land due to the fact that it is mostly urban, then the nation is actually a lot less crowded than it would seem. My point so far as Britain is concerned is that the nation is going to need high levels of immigration to maintain its current level and that is possible only through immigration, which was one of the major factors in the Brexit vote. In addition, most of those immigrants are probably going to come from the same places they came from before.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
The UK had an odour before the immigrants started arriving. It's just getting worse now.

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
However, if 80% of the population is living in just 5% of the land due to the fact that it is mostly urban, then the nation is actually a lot less crowded than it would seem.

Not really. Almost everybody is crowded into urban areas, and Britain's urban areas are right near to each other rather than widely spaced by thousands of miles like they are in Canada and America (which is also muchy more sparsely populated than Britain).

And if Britain keeps bringing in a city the size of Birmingham every two years then there is going to be less and less beautiful countryside, because it's going to have to be built on to accommodate all the Toms, Dicks and Abduls flooding in to the country.

My point so far as Britain is concerned is that the nation is going to need high levels of immigration
Says who?

Up until the late 1990s, when the Blair Administration opened the floodgates without asking the British people whether or not that is what they want, immigration into Britain was tens of thousands a year. Now it's hundreds of thousands a year. Since Labour swept to power in 1997, more immigrants have arrived in Britain than arrived in the previous 1000 years. There are too many immigrants in Britain. This overcrowded country is getting swamped and the British people have had enough. Like Mr Farage says, immigrants needs to be reduced to a tenth of what it is now, back to the level it was for decades before Blair's New Labour party opened the floodgates in the late Nineties.

which was one of the major factors in the Brexit vote.
One of the major factors in the Brexit vote was immigration, with the British people wanting out of the EU to get out of its disastrous free movement laws and take back control of our borders.

In addition, most of those immigrants are probably going to come from the same places they came from before.
Britain needs to start bringing in skilled migrants from the Commonwealth, like doctors from India, and stop following the EU's stupid free movement laws which allow ANYONE into Britain whether they are skilled or unskilled and whether or not they are intending to find work. Thanks to these laws, Romanian pickpockets and Bulgarian child buggerers are routinely allowed to enter our country. This has to stop.

In fact, the EU's free movement laws are racist, as they make EU citizens take priority over non-EU citizens.

He should move to Greenland. Lot's of room there..........

Greenland: A country which left the EU in 1986.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Muslims could not rule the world by force. They could not rule it by persuasion. They are trying to rule the world by sheer numbers.
It should have been obvious years ago that they were immigrating all over the world to get a toehold in other societies. And now they are succeeding.
Infiltrate, multiply and eventually take over. That's what they do.
Countries are just now catching on and regretting their liberal immigration laws but it's too late. There are still the bleeding hearts who believe in the 'peaceful religion' and think Muslims are just seeking a better life. Well they're seeking a better life alright. For them! Not so 'better' for the rest of us who will eventually be living under Sharia law.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
Muslims could not rule the world by force. They could not rule it by persuasion. They are trying to rule the world by sheer numbers.
It should have been obvious years ago that they were immigrating all over the world to get a toehold in other societies. And now they are succeeding.
Infiltrate, multiply and eventually take over. That's what they do.
Countries are just now catching on and regretting their liberal immigration laws but it's too late. There are still the bleeding hearts who believe in the 'peaceful religion' and think Muslims are just seeking a better life. Well they're seeking a better life alright. For them! Not so 'better' for the rest of us who will eventually be living under Sharia law.

I couldn't have put it better myself.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Muslims could not rule the world by force. They could not rule it by persuasion. They are trying to rule the world by sheer numbers.
It should have been obvious years ago that they were immigrating all over the world to get a toehold in other societies. And now they are succeeding.
Infiltrate, multiply and eventually take over. That's what they do.
Countries are just now catching on and regretting their liberal immigration laws but it's too late. There are still the bleeding hearts who believe in the 'peaceful religion' and think Muslims are just seeking a better life. Well they're seeking a better life alright. For them! Not so 'better' for the rest of us who will eventually be living under Sharia law.

Utter nonsense. Here are the nations with the largest numbers of emigrants. Please tell me how many of them are Muslims.

I couldn't have put it better myself.

No, that is because you are racist to the core.

I'll bet it stinks there with all those people. Good thing mexican food isn't popular.

You know what really stinks? Racist idiots.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Utter nonsense. Here are the nations with the largest numbers of emigrants. Please tell me how many of them are Muslim?



Utter nonsense? Read history and see what Muslims have done. Read the Quran and see what their ultimate goal is.
That will tell more than counting heads of immigrants to see what they are.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,593
8,166
113
B.C.
Utter nonsense? Read history and see what Muslims have done. Read the Quran and see what their ultimate goal is.
That will tell more than counting heads of immigrants to see what they are.
No you must be wrong . Every one is beautiful in their own way ay ay ay . I know I heard it on a multicultural coke ad years ago . It must be so I mean Coca Cola .
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
No you must be wrong . Every one is beautiful in their own way ay ay ay . I know I heard it on a multicultural coke ad years ago . It must be so I mean Coca Cola .[/QUOTE


They would be a lot more beautiful if they stayed in the country of their birth, practised their repressive, archaic religion among themselves and left the atheists and various other religious denominations alone!
If Muslims think the Christians and Jews are the only ones they have to conquer they should think again. Those of other faiths and atheists are not going to be forced to convert to Islam. Not in this lifetime!
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,593
8,166
113
B.C.
No you must be wrong . Every one is beautiful in their own way ay ay ay . I know I heard it on a multicultural coke ad years ago . It must be so I mean Coca Cola .[/QUOTE


They would be a lot more beautiful if they stayed in the country of their birth, practised their repressive, archaic religion among themselves and left the atheists and various other religious denominations alone!
If Muslims think the Christians and Jews are the only ones they have to conquer they should think again. Those of other faiths and atheists are not going to be forced to convert to Islam. Not in this lifetime!
Yup last I saw Sihks are still wearing their ceremonial daggers . The kirpans they carry for religious reasons .
The reason being that they will use the knife to take their own life rather than submit .
I wonder how our defense minister squares this circle .
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
No you must be wrong . Every one is beautiful in their own way ay ay ay . I know I heard it on a multicultural coke ad years ago . It must be so I mean Coca Cola .[/QUOTE


They would be a lot more beautiful if they stayed in the country of their birth, practised their repressive, archaic religion among themselves and left the atheists and various other religious denominations alone!
If Muslims think the Christians and Jews are the only ones they have to conquer they should think again. Those of other faiths and atheists are not going to be forced to convert to Islam. Not in this lifetime!

What's your ethnic background?