Trudeau directly addresses protesters on pipeline

[captain morgan]

as I'm aware,

No sh*t Sherlock... We've all known this since day 1

none of the three eastern Canadian refineries – Suncor, Valero, and Irving – have publicly announced intentions to make the required investment, plan and implement refinery changes to support the processing of tar sands bitumen.

As usual, you are decidedly wrong.... It's getting kinda pathetic, more often than not, when I read through your occasional post, I am truly embarrassed for you

citation request for your claim that Irving Oil is currently capable of processing tar sludge or has announced an intention to convert it's current processing to be able to handle tar sludge.

Google

U.S. exports now account for the significant majority of Eastern Canadian imports.

Interesting observation... Say, do you think that there's an opportunity here for Western Canadian oil producers????

Someone should really look into that

your premise was that Eastern refinery processing of tar sludge would usurp current import of oil from "your boogeyman nations".

Hmmmm... I wonder if that might be part of a cunning plan related to providing domestic oil supply to Canada?

... Then again, the Liberals have always carved close friendships with merciless regimes that rape, butcher children and bury women alive.

... If memory serves, didn't Justine express his absolute appreciation of a number of these regimes?.. You're the Liberals biggest fanboi, which do you like supporting?... The burying alive folks or the rape and murder of children guys?

 

[waldo]

you've already started repeating yourself timmy...your e-life expectancy doesn't look promising. :lol:

you can't truthfully suggest anything I've posted is in any way "on par" with the insults/attack thrown at me. Yes, I've already stated I've been suckered into responding, in kind... but again, it's in no way on the same level as what exists around here. I could take the effort and string together the full complement of that insult and present it back to you. To what end? It's clear there's little to no real moderation on this board to even attempt to quell the insults. It's like it's the norm around here!

I had a genuine read of the board rules and made reference to them in a couple of posts... those board rules specifically speak to insults/attacks yet, apparently, that particular related rule has a degree of flexibility in how it's applied. Since you've taken the effort to string together some of my past, can you advise on how that moderation flexibility is applied?

The fact that the Irving Oil; refinery is ALREADY refining Alberta crude.

you keep saying this; I keep asking you to substantiate it.

 

[captain morgan]

you can't truthfully suggest anything I've posted is in any way "on par" with the insults/attack thrown at me. Yes, I've already stated I've been suckered into responding, in kind... but again, it's in no way on the same level as what exists around here. I could take the effort and string together the full complement of that insult and present it back to you. To what end? It's clear there's little to no real moderation on this board to even attempt to quell the insults. It's like it's the norm around here!

I had a genuine read of the board rules and made reference to them in a couple of posts... those board rules specifically speak to insults/attacks yet, apparently, that particular related rule has a degree of flexibility in how it's applied. Since you've taken the effort to string together some of my past, can you advise on how that moderation flexibility is applied?

There there snookums, don't cry... We understand

 

[waldo]

Bullshyte.

apparently, very easy for you to say

There there snookums, don't cry... We understand

case in point! Do you guys ever entertain the thought of expanding the board's membership... of entertaining discussion that presents differing views/statements/positions... differing from your own... without resorting automatically to insult? Do you feel threatened?

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

you can't truthfully suggest anything I've posted is in any way "on par" with the insults/attack thrown at me. Yes, I've already stated I've been suckered into responding, in kind... but again, it's in no way on the same level as what exists around here. I could take the effort and string together the full complement of that insult and present it back to you. To what end? It's clear there's little to no real moderation on this board to even attempt to quell the insults. It's like it's the norm around here!

I had a genuine read of the board rules and made reference to them in a couple of posts... those board rules specifically speak to insults/attacks yet, apparently, that particular related rule has a degree of flexibility in how it's applied. Since you've taken the effort to string together some of my past, can you advise on how that moderation flexibility is applied?

 

[captain morgan]

case in point! Do you guys ever entertain the thought of expanding the board's membership... of entertaining discussion that presents differing views/statements/positions... differing from your own... without resorting automatically to insult? Do you feel threatened?

That description disqualifies you

 

[waldo]

...

another case in point. I simply responded to a post and summary review presented to me by member 'Locutus'... that's a whine, to you?

That description disqualifies you

why so?

 

[captain morgan]

... of entertaining discussion that presents differing views/statements/positions... differing from your own... without resorting automatically to insult?

Based on the above, you are disqualified

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

another case in point. I simply responded to a post and summary review presented to me by member 'Locutus'... that's a whine, to you?

You've been whining since you got here man. Accusing people of being Partisan, btw did you know you have a Stephen Harper Avatar? .

All I've seen from you is a bunch of manifesto nonsense and complaint that no one is embracing said ideology by accusing them of not following the rules.

 

[Locutus]

you can't truthfully suggest anything I've posted is in any way "on par" with the insults/attack thrown at me.

I imagine you meant 'can't truthfully be suggesting that'...or not, I don't care. But no son, I never said that. Just pointing out your pot-kettle hypocrisy and bordeline whining. Rise above it. It truly shows a lack of self-discipline and maturity to feel obliged to respond to what someone has 'thrown at me'. It's text bud, words.

Yes, I've already stated I've been suckered into responding, in kind... but again, it's in no way on the same level as what exists around here.

Whining. If you are that powerless to resist we much what some clown has texted toward you, I can't help ya much.

I could take the effort and string together the full complement of that insult and present it back to you. To what end? It's clear there's little to no real moderation on this board to even attempt to quell the insults. It's like it's the norm around here!

You could do anything you set your mind to but trust me, I don't care. You say you were invited back to your 4 year-old secondary account. I doubt that but if that's your story slim, you stick to it. Learn to know the difference between moderation and hand-holding.

I had a genuine read of the board rules and made reference to them in a couple of posts... those board rules specifically speak to insults/attacks yet, apparently, that particular related rule has a degree of flexibility in how it's applied. Since you've taken the effort to string together some of my past, can you advise on how that moderation flexibility is applied?

See your first post on this site. Be the bigger man. Welcome to Canadian Content.

 

[waldo]

Rise above it. It truly shows a lack of self-discipline and maturity to feel obliged to respond to what someone has 'thrown at me'. It's text bud, words.

self-discipline??? And where's the self-discipline from those members who throw insult. Do you believe the regular ongoing insult-fest around here... adds to the board? Do you believe it fosters... promotes... genuine exchange?

You say you were invited back to your 4 year-old secondary account. I doubt that but if that's your story slim, you stick to it. Learn to know the difference between moderation and hand-holding.

what's a "secondary account"? Yes, I did get a head's up about the board a while back... along with a regular assortment of emails (from this board) over some period of time, similarly, doing exactly that. Perhaps you could describe your understanding of moderation on this board... and why it, apparently, turns a blind eye to all manner of insult/attack.

Be the bigger man

ya ya, rise above it! Why not... in conjunction with that... have moderation that actually enforces the board rules on insult/attack?

 

[Locutus]

self-discipline??? And where's the self-discipline from those members who throw insult. Do you believe the regular ongoing insult-fest around here... adds to the board? Do you believe it fosters... promotes... genuine exchange?



what's a "secondary account"? Yes, I did get a head's up about the board a while back... along with a regular assortment of emails (from this board) over some period of time, similarly, doing exactly that. Perhaps you could describe your understanding of moderation on this board... and why it, apparently, turns a blind eye to all manner of insult/attack.



ya ya, rise above it! Why not... in conjunction with that... have moderation that actually enforces the board rules on insult/attack?

Now, now...don't be mad, just be, man. :hippy2:

 

[Colpy]

you can't truthfully suggest anything I've posted is in any way "on par" with the insults/attack thrown at me. Yes, I've already stated I've been suckered into responding, in kind... but again, it's in no way on the same level as what exists around here. I could take the effort and string together the full complement of that insult and present it back to you. To what end? It's clear there's little to no real moderation on this board to even attempt to quell the insults. It's like it's the norm around here!

I had a genuine read of the board rules and made reference to them in a couple of posts... those board rules specifically speak to insults/attacks yet, apparently, that particular related rule has a degree of flexibility in how it's applied. Since you've taken the effort to string together some of my past, can you advise on how that moderation flexibility is applied?


.

Actually, you are correct in this.

Those of us who are familiar around here do "get away" with more.

That is because we've managed to stay here, we actually have something to say, and we usually don't resort to insult unless we are dealing with unrepentant ar$eholes.

Like anything else, this is a bit of an old boys' club.....with girls included.

If you wanna join, you gotta get down off your high horse.

That's how I see it anyway.

 

[waldo]

Actually, you are correct in this.

Those of us who are familiar around here do "get away" with more.

That is because we've managed to stay here, we actually have something to say, and we usually don't resort to insult unless we are dealing with unrepentant ar$eholes.

Like anything else, this is a bit of an old boys' club.....with girls included.

If you wanna join, you gotta get down off your high horse.

That's how I see it anyway.

now, you may think someone you don't agree with is an "arsehole", idiot, moron (or the plethora of other insults you regularly drop)... you may think you're presenting definitive summation/assessment... you may think you're right in everything you present... you may think you're providing relevant and countering posts to your interpreted "arseholes"... you may think all of that. Mixing all your thinking with overt insult simply acts to reinforce, to you, your own thinking. It certainly doesn't add to your statements/positions...

 

[IdRatherBeSkiing]

There there snookums, don't cry... We understand

Threads always get better with pictures of the Pretty Boy crying.

 

[CDNBear]

I love this bar.

 

[Colpy]

now, you may think someone you don't agree with is an "arsehole", idiot, moron (or the plethora of other insults you regularly drop)... you may think you're presenting definitive summation/assessment... you may think you're right in everything you present... you may think you're providing relevant and countering posts to your interpreted "arseholes"... you may think all of that. Mixing all your thinking with overt insult simply acts to reinforce, to you, your own thinking. It certainly doesn't add to your statements/positions...

There are lots of people here I disagree with vehemently and often that I rarely, if ever, shout insults ay.....I could give you a list.

Attitude and intellect is everything .

 

[CDNBear]

There are lots of people here I disagree with vehemently and often that I rarely, if ever, shout insults ay.....I could give you a list.

Attitude and intellect is everything .

Since I sit further left than the bulk of the board, I know where I am, on that list, lol.

 

[waldo]

Attitude and intellect is everything .

then use yours... and, per member 'Locutus', rise above insults... be the better man!

 

[CDNBear]

then use yours... and, per member 'Locutus', rise above insults... be the better man!

We already are.

That doesn't make you look so good.