The US Is Ceding the Energy Industry of the Future to China

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
The US Is Ceding the Energy Industry of the Future to China

On Tuesday, President Trump pledged to end the “war on coal” by rolling back the Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era federal policy that compels states to reduce carbon emissions from power plants. China responded Wednesday, reaffirming its commitment to investing in clean energy and honoring the Paris Agreement, an international accord to tackle climate change with progressively more stringent carbon emissions goals.

The CPP, as Trump and EPA-head Scott Pruitt argue, overburdens the coal and mining industries with needless regulations, leading to massive layoffs and power plant shutdowns. That’s one way of putting it. Another: A man who dismissed climate change as a “hoax” created by the Chinese, and a climate denier who still wants to debate the laws of physics, are repealing environmental regulations in order to save an industry that isn’t being killed by environmental regulation.

Trump’s regressive climate policies fly in the face of the consensus of scientists and economists, who say natural gas and renewables like solar and wind power are eclipsing coal as cheaper, cleaner energy sources. In under 100 days, Trump has ceded Obama’s hard-earned position for the US as a global leader on climate change to China, the world’s largest emitter of carbon. All to ressurect an industry that experts agree isn’t coming back.

Not about to lose an opportunity to drive that point home, Chinese officials today reiterated their commitment to the Paris Agreement, and subtly chided the US for its backwards-facing climate policies.

“The Paris Agreement was hard-earned. All parties of the international community, including China, had a common consensus on it,” foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang told reporters Wednesday. “All parties should conform to the historical trend of the time, seize the opportunity, honour their commitment, take practical and positive actions and implement the agreement.”

While Trump ignores the energy transition to renewables, China is accelerating it. The Chinese government is shedding as many as 500,000 jobs in the coal and steel sector, offering job re-training and unemployment benefits to affected workers. Additionally, China is soaring ahead of the US in its green energy investments, installing a record 4 million solar panels from 2013 to 2017. In 2015, it hit a global record for newly-installed wind power capacity, 32.5 GW. China is on track to meet—and exceed—its carbon reduction commitments under the Paris climate agreement well ahead of schedule.

China’s motivations for pursing green energy are two-fold: Not only are cities like Beijing choking in smog, but it sees an opportunity to become the number one international provider of renewable technologies to developing nations. Since Trump was elected president, there’s been talk of China stepping forward to replace the US as the global leader in producing energy innovations. Trump’s actions this week only serve to cement the idea that one of America’s biggest geopolitical rivals will be architect of the global energy transition.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to peg the livelihood of much of his voting base to the rapidly flatlining coal industry. Maybe, during their meeting in April, Chinese President Xi Jinping could explain some basic economics to Trump.

https://www.google.com/amp/gizmodo....gy-industry-of-the-future-to-c-1793760242/amp
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,894
14,430
113
Low Earth Orbit
You do realize coal is essential in making steel. Demand is high enough that mines in Canada, Australia and the UK are reopening.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,894
14,430
113
Low Earth Orbit
Because it's a f-cking fact.

It's okay if mines reopen all over the globe but it's a sin when the US does it?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
You do realize coal is essential in making steel. Demand is high enough that mines in Canada, Australia and the UK are reopening.

Most of that coal mined in places like the Crowsnest Pass went to Asia for coking.
 

Remington1

Council Member
Jan 30, 2016
1,469
1
36
As it should have been done years ago. When you are a giant polluter of earth, then yes, you should be the leader on addressing the problem. It is dismal that the US is stepping back, but it is right for the Chinese to take over the reigns. Their citizens are walking around with masks!! Canada is being hypocritical (seems to be a new found character flaw) and coal remains 10% of CN revenue (coal heading for Asia). As long as Canada is continuing the sale of coal, the giving of billions to India and China to combat climate change would be better spent on health, seniors and education in Canada.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Don't worry, we'll be selling them liquified nat gas to clear the air.

I can't imagine how coal competes successfully against Natural Gas. The Americans must have subsidized those mines like crazy to keep Appalachia employed in the past.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
As it should have been done years ago. When you are a giant polluter of earth, then yes, you should be the leader on addressing the problem. It is dismal that the US is stepping back, but it is right for the Chinese to take over the reigns. Their citizens are walking around with masks!! Canada is being hypocritical (seems to be a new found character flaw) and coal remains 10% of CN revenue (coal heading for Asia). As long as Canada is continuing the sale of coal, the giving of billions to India and China to combat climate change would be better spent on health, seniors and education in Canada.

Coal could support seniors and education in Canada.

This would be the beauty of targeted taxation. Refine the bad into the good by intelligent taxation. Redirect power into multipliers.

Rather than mere accumulators.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
I can't imagine how coal competes successfully against Natural Gas. The Americans must have subsidized those mines like crazy to keep Appalachia employed in the past.

Coal is dirt cheap compared to most fuels, especially if you have a lot of it.

Comparison of Fuel Costs

Actually the US under Trump seems intent on conceding the energy tech to everyone. The world's largest manufacturer of wind turbine blades is located in Denmark and it already has branch plants in the US and elsewhere. By delaying or rolling back green tech the US will be forced to play catch-up and that is always expensive.