You didn't read it, did you?
I did. It was pro-GMO ya moron.
You didn't read it, did you?
Mostly except for the crop psychologists.
You?
Of course I do.
It's the same methodology used to show scientific consensus on AGW.![]()
They include psychologists in the GMO consensus? What does psychology have to do with crop sciences?
Real science is going to save you from the climate scientists?
I can pick and choose the credibility of the participants which means more to a consensus than agreement.
I haven't?
I can pick and choose the credibility of the participants which means more to a consensus than agreement.
You haven't discredited the scientific consensus in either case.
That thread trying to prove there are no climate scientists was laughably bad.