The sun

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
Solar Geomagnetic Ap Index now at lowest point in its record

4 01 2009 As many regular readers know, I’ve pointed out several times the incident of the abrupt and sustained lowering of the Ap Index which occurred in October 2005. The abrupt step change seemed (to me) to be out of place with the data, and the fact that the sun seems so have reestablished at a lower plateau of the Ap index after that event and has not recovered is an anomaly worth investigating.
From the data provided by NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) you can see just how little Ap magnetic activity there has been since. Here’s a graph from October 2008 showing the step in october 2005:

click for a larger image
However, some have suggested that this event doesn’t merit attention, and that it is not particularly unusual. I beg to differ. Here’s why.
In mid December I started working with Paul Stanko, who has an active interest in the solar data and saw what I saw in the Ap Index. He did some research and found Ap data that goes back further, all the way to 1932. His source for the data is the SPIDR (Space Physics Interactive Data Resource) which is a division of NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). He did some data import and put it all into a mult-page Excel spreadsheet which you can access here.
I had planned to do more study of it, but you know how holidays are, lot’s of things to do with that free time. I didn’t get back to looking at it until today, especially after SWPC updated their solar datasets on January 3rd, including the Ap Index. Looking at the data to 1932, it was clear to me that what we are seeing today for levels doesn’t exist in the record.
About the same time, I got an email from David Archibald, showing his graph of the Ap Index, graphed back to 1932. Having two independent sources of confirmation, I’ve decided to post this then. The solar average geomagnetic planetary index, Ap is at its lowest level in 75 years, for the entirety of the record:

Click for a larger image - I’ve added some annotation to the graph provided by Archibald to point out areas of interest and to clarify some aspects of it for the novice reader.
The last time the Ap index was this low was 1933. The December 2008 Ap value of 2, released by SWPC yesterday, has never been this low. Further, the trend from October 2005 continues to decline after being on a fairly level plateau for two years. It has started a decline again in the last year.
This Ap index is a proxy that tells us that the sun is now quite inactive, and the other indices of sunspot index and 10.7 radio flux also confirm this. The sun is in a full blown funk, and your guess is as good as mine as to when it might pull out of it. So far, predictions by NOAA’s SWPC and NASA’s Hathway have not been near the reality that is being measured.
The starting gate for solar cycle 24 opened ayear ago today, when I announced the first ever cycle 24 sunspot. However in the year since, it has become increasingly clear that the horse hasn’t left the gate, and may very well be lame.

Copied from: Watts Up With That
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
[SIZE=+4]UNEXPLAINED SOLAR ANOMALY[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]by gary d. goodwin[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+2]The Anomaly[/SIZE]
I want to make it perfectly clear that the ORCA is NOT the same anomaly that I will present in the images below. Since the advent of the ORCA (circa June 1998 ) we have been intensely watching all of the available images of the sun. In October of 1998, we began seeing a strange object in the lower left hand corner of the SOHO C2 images. At first we thought it was simply an imaging anomaly, perhaps a wrinkle in a filter or a scratch on the lens. We ignored it. But then we noticed that it would show up some of the time and not at other times. There was initially no apparent pattern. It wasn't with any particular filter, any particular exposure time nor any other expected variable. The only noticable variable was time; It would be there for a few days and then it would be gone for a few days. The image below is a typical SOHO C2 image showing the anomaly. You can see it in the lower left hand corner of the picture. We simply call it the *Tower*. At the same time we began seeing the Tower, in early October 1998 the gray blocks that you can see in all four corners of the C2. They appear to have been placed there so as to cover up the Tower. You will also notice that only the "tip" of the Tower appears to be showing. To myself, it appears to be long and cylindrical and as if it were a "tube" that had been sliced off at an angle. You will also notice that there appears to be another shorter tower next to it. In a five megabyte movie that we have (too large for the page), relatively small bright pixels can be seen coming from the left border of the image and going toward and down in to the tower. Incredible images.

THE SOLAR ANOMALY
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
46
Newfoundland!
I dont think we should be shouting about this yet. here are my reasons:

if you examine the graph above, you'll see two things:

a) the distance between the minimums of 1963/4 and 1976/7 is about 13 years. This is not incomparably smaller than the distance between the minimum of 1996/7 and the present day.
b) While the Ap index is lower than it was in 1932, the section of time between now and 1932 is NOTHING on the scale of time during which the sun has existed and also fairly small compared to the time scale during which records of things like weather and climate have existed (at least on an anecdotal level).