So verify it. Reference for this definition?
"Moral" problems are relative. Societies define what is moral. Christianity is only one society and it is one that doesn't value ALL life.
You know L., a repetitive litany of 'prove it' does not constitute an argument. I don't post links because i have found it a futile exercize, you can find links that 'prove' just about anything on any side of an issue on the internet.. from absurdities, like the is earth is flat, to alien abduction experiences, to man made Global Warming, to homosexuality as a natural, genetically defined state. It's all just a lot of nonsense, gift wrapped in some academic sounding mumbo jumbo... worthless in practical terms.
You prove it. I haven't seen anything from you that presents a position on anything, just a cantakerous rejection of anything that doesn't smack of the most maudlin, relativistic moral goo, involving absolutely no societal or individualistic responsibility at all.. beyond one's own material gratification.
And 'moral' problems are absolute not relative. They are imprinted as absolute Truth into the fabric of Creation. Society, post or ex the Divine.. in inspiration, revelation, law.. is utterly incapable of defining what is good or evil. We see that all around us now, most profoundly in the holocaust of 'legal' abortion. We saw it when the Nazi 'society' determined that racial purification would rid the world of 'useless eaters'.
That is undoubtedy based on faith, and therefor beyond proof.. but it is also True. The manifestation of not accepting Truth will be seen in a chaotic dissolution of a society, whose ethos is to its own 'freedom' from any 'God' given moral maxims.
The proof will be in that pudding.