The privatization of Hydro One

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Meanwhile, Robert Benzie and David Rider note (link is external) that Kathleen Wynne seems happy to give away public money to subsidize the privatization of not only Ontario Hydro but Toronto Hydro in the name of managing public money.

Premier Kathleen Wynne’s government will be all ears if Mayor John Tory asks for tax concessions to expedite the sale of Toronto Hydro.

But no such formal request has come from Tory, and Finance Minister Charles Sousa cautions the city would have to account for a 22 per cent provincial transfer tax.

“Toronto Hydro will be subject to the same conditions as everybody else,” Sousa told the Star in an interview.

That suggests the city could be on the hook for $220 million in transfer tax if a $1-billion stake in Toronto Hydro were sold.

“Toronto Hydro would have to abide by that transfer tax number,” the finance minister said, noting he lowered that levy to 22 per cent last year from 33 per cent. It will go back up to 33 per cent in 2019.

While there are write-offs the utility could use to reduce its transfer tax tab, the more complicated matter of a departure tax has yet to be determined.

They said Wynne’s administration is willing to listen to any pitch from the mayor and council — especially if the money the city saves in provincial taxes is plowed back into municipal infrastructure.

As a publicly owned company, Toronto Hydro now makes what are known as “payments in lieu of taxes” — or PILs — instead of corporate income tax.

“The departure tax is a mechanism that ensures taxes are appropriately collected when a company ceases to be 90 per cent municipally owned and leaves the PILs system,” she said.

“A company that pays a departure tax amount has had a gain on the value of its property while in the PILs system which needs to be recognized.”

Wynne stressed the province, which is selling off a majority stake in Hydro One, would not prevent Toronto from doing the same thing.
“It is up to the city of Toronto council and the mayor to have this discussion and to make a decision about their utility. It is up to them,” she said Thursday.

Energy Minister Glenn Thibeault has underscored that.

“The decision to privatize Toronto Hydro is up to Toronto city council. There are no ifs, and or buts . . . that is the council that makes the decision,” said Thibeault.

Still, NDP MPP Jagmeet Singh said he’s worried “the Liberals can encourage the privatization by offering special tax loopholes.

“The reality is the premier can make it a lot easier for Toronto Hydro and other local utilities to privatize if she gives the municipalities a tax break,” said Singh.

“So, the Liberal government can actually encourage this decision if they waive that tax,” he said, adding “it’s very clear that privatization increases costs.”

Wynne’s government is using $4 billion of the $9 billion it expects to raise from selling 60 per cent of Hydro One for new public transit, highways, and bridges. The remaining $5 billion will pay off the transmission utility’s debt.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Are electric vehicles and new devices part of the package as spin-off industries?? Are back-up battery packs going to be available for the home as an emergency kit if the lines are down for an extended period. I live in gas country so a 'fat-boy propane tank is what the BBQ is hooked up to as well as the garage and house as it holds NG rather than propane. Now about that mini turbine for the car??
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
-- Premier Kathleen Wynne is calling high electricity prices her "mistake," sounding a note of contrition on one of the major issues threatening the Liberals' re-election bid in 2018.

Amid the usual rallying of the troops at the Ontario Liberals' annual general meeting Saturday, Wynne addressed her poor popularity numbers, which she called the "elephant in the room."

"I think that people look at me and many of them think, 'She's not who we thought she was. She's become a typical politician. She'll do anything to win,"' Wynne said.

"Frankly, I may have and I think I sometimes have given them reason to think that."

Wynne said part of convincing Ontarians that she wants to do what is in their best interests is admitting when she has made a mistake.

"People have told me that they've had to choose between paying the electricity bill and buying food or paying rent," Wynne said.

"That is unacceptable to me. It is unacceptable that people in Ontario are facing that choice. Our government made a mistake. It was my mistake.

An eight-per-cent rebate on electricity bills comes into effect Jan. 1, but Wynne said she will find more ways to lower rates and reduce the burden on consumers.

After her speech, Wynne wouldn't point to any specific decision on the electricity file that she deems a mistake, but said her focus was on the big issues facing the system and she hasn't always paid enough attention to how costs were accumulating on people's bills.

Auditor general Bonnie Lysyk has said the electricity portion of hydro bills for homes and small businesses rose 70 per cent between 2006 and 2014.

Wynne calls high electricity prices her 'mistake' | CTV News
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Ontario government needs quick $$$$, before Ontario's credit rating hits C-, so they're burning the furniture.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Maybe her admission today that the Libs have ignored all of the ranting about Hydro prices, tied in with a survey that said the Libs would win if she stepped down, is a foreshadow that she is considering stepping down, for the good of the party......

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/ontario/146485-libs-would-win-ontario-again.html

The Libs MIGHT win if she steps down, depending on who replaces her but they have no chance, if she stays.

They have outstayed their welcome.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
I don't know if the Brown Cons have a plan for Hydro costs and I heard the NDP's Horvath recently say something along the lines of "give us 6 months after we are elected and we will sort things out'. Maybe that was just to not reveal their campaign plans but, if Wynne leaves and they reduce the cost by 25%, they may win again.....
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
So if in 'April 2002: Ontario Superior Court rules that the government does not have the right to sell shares in Hydro One.' How can they do so now?


Here's a brief history of Hydro woes from 2003......


The issue of electricity - how much we have, who makes it and who sells it - has been a thorn in the side of Ernie Eves throughout his term as leader of Ontario's Conservatives.


Along with the reins of government, Eves inherited responsibility for Ontario Hydro's crippling debt and a controversial Tory plan to partially privatize the public utility. He proceeded with the privatization solution, launching a stormy tenure as premier that was marked by unpopular decisions and, ultimately, a complete policy reversal.

One could be forgiven for thinking that such a track record would leave the Tories vulnerable on the election trail. For their part, the New Democrats have fashioned their entire campaign around the theme of "Public Power," with an emphasis on keeping the province's electrical transmission and generating systems entirely in public hands.

But the fact is, all three of the major parties bear some responsibility for our now-faltering electrical system: the Tories, who gave the green light to the disastrous Darlington nuclear plant project; the Liberals, who ignored Darlington's massive cost overruns; the New Democrats, who froze power rates even as Ontario Hydro's debt continued to mount.

"No question, mistakes have been made in relation to this system," said Mitch Rothman, a chief economist with Ontario Hydro from 1982 to 1993. "And for those kinds of mistakes, all three parties bear some blame."

Darlington was the most costly mistake, and remains one of the most problematic nuclear power stations in Ontario, said Tom Adams, executive director of Energy Probe.

"Its cost overrun fundamentally weakened Ontario Hydro's financial position and was the largest single cause of the utility's financial collapse," Adams said.

The challenge for each of the three major parties in this campaign is threefold: whoever governs will need to pay down years' worth of accumulated Hydro debt, keep electricity prices within reach for consumers, and find ways of paying for upgrades to generating capacity and transmission lines.

How will they do it? See their promises to the left.

How did they get here? Below, we pick highlights from the life of Ontario Hydro, dated from the birth of the Darlington facility:

1970: Conservative government of John Robarts acquires land near Bowmanville for creation of the Darlington nuclear plant.

1973: Engineering studies done for Darlington. The new generation of nuclear plant was designed with sophisticated computer systems that would provide significantly upgraded shutdown safety design, and would allow it to adjust its output.

1976: Tory government of Bill Davis gives Darlington project an exemption from public environmental assessment review.

1978: Cabinet approves Darlington spending. Early estimate projects that the four-unit station would be completed by 1983 at a cost of $2.5 billion.

1983: Initial deadline for completion of Darlington project comes and goes.

1985: After 42 years in power, the Tories are toppled by a coalition of Liberals and New Democrats. The new government contemplates cancelling the Darlington project, but relents when Ontario Hydro officials offer assurances that the plant is almost complete.

1987: Liberals under David Peterson win majority in general election.

1989: Darlington takes its first of four units fully online.

1990: New Democrats under Bob Rae win general election. In an attempt to deal with the "gigantic" debt amassed by Ontario Hydro, government orders cuts to maintenance costs.

1993: Construction completed at Darlington, a decade late and at a total cost of $14.4 billion. Ontario Hydro is now billions of dollars in debt; nonetheless, the NDP government imposes a rate freeze, saying the price consumers are being charged for electricity represents "power at cost."

1995: Tories return to power under Mike Harris. They leave the NDP rate freeze in place, but announce intention to solve the Ontario Hydro debt problem by breaking up the public utility's monopoly on power generation and transmission.

Oct. 30, 1998: Energy Competition Act comes into effect. It's the road map to a deregulated electricity market. For details see Deregulation Recap.

June 2000: Eyeing problems with electricity deregulation in other jurisdictions, the Harris government delays the date for deregulation indefinitely. It was originally set for Nov. 1, 2000.

December 2001: Tories announce the market will open May 1, 2002. Harris also announces that Hydro One will be sold in a share offering expected to be worth $5 billion.

March 2002: Ernie Eves succeeds Harris as Tory leader and premier.

April 2002: Ontario Superior Court rules that the government does not have the right to sell shares in Hydro One.

May 2002: Government proceeds with plan to sell off Hydro One, and to let electricity prices float at market levels. In the hot summer that follows, the province's generation capacity is not sufficient to meet demand; consumers grow alarmed at skyrocketing prices.

June 2002: Eves backs off plans to privatize Hydro One, cancelling what was expected to have been the biggest public share offering in Canadian corporate history.

July 2002: Hydro One CEO Eleanor Clitheroe is fired after details of her compensation package are made public.

November 2002: Faced with a looming consumer revolt, Eves reverses the deregulation plans and announces a rate cap of 4.3 cents per kilowatt-hour until at least 2006. The move killed business for electricity resellers, and eliminated the incentive for private companies to build generating plants.

Aug. 14, 2003: Massive power failure plunges most of the province into darkness. Province's generating stations - including Darlington - enact emergency shutdown procedures, and aren't fully up to speed again until a week later.