The photo which is falsely claimed depicts slavery in the British Empire

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,486
1,838
113
Starving, dehydrated and, in many cases, dying, hundreds of African slaves are crammed on to the deck of a British ship. Taken in the early days of photography, this picture gives a disturbingly contemporary feel to one of history's bleakest chapters.

No wonder the National Archives chose it to illustrate the 'profoundly oppressive' nature of the British Empire in an exhibition.

However, there's a problem. Despite what the National Archives are trying to lead people to believe, the poor souls in this picture were no longer slaves. They had just been RESCUED by the Royal Navy.

The British, who had first voted to abolish the slave trade more than 60 years earlier, were trying to stop it — not that it suits the Empire-bashing narrative to say so...

According to the National Archives this picture shows slavery under the 'evil' British Empire. In fact it depicts the Royal Navy SAVING slaves, as ROBERT HARDMAN explains




By Robert Hardman for the Daily Mail
22 December 2017

Starving, dehydrated and, in many cases, dying, hundreds of African slaves are crammed on to the deck of a British ship. Taken in the early days of photography, this picture gives a disturbingly contemporary feel to one of history's bleakest chapters.

No wonder the National Archives chose it to illustrate the 'profoundly oppressive' nature of the British Empire in an exhibition.

Thousands of visitors, many of them schoolchildren, would pause to reflect on the photograph captioned: 'East African slaves taken aboard HMS Daphne from a dhow, 1 November 1868.'

The subtext was clear: look at the cruelty of these brutal British imperialists. Except the curators of the exhibition had made one very serious mistake indeed. For the poor souls in this picture were no longer slaves.

They had just been rescued by HMS Daphne from an Arab slave ship, liberated from a crew of monsters, one of whom had beaten a baby to death a few hours earlier.


Thousands of visitors would pause to reflect on the photograph (pictured) captioned: 'East African slaves taken aboard HMS Daphne from a dhow, 1 November 1868'

That British sailor in the bottom left of the photograph was no villain. He was one of the good guys, part of a high-risk Royal Navy operation to curtail a roaring slave trade operating out of East Africa. It was a despicable business involving a network of Arab potentates plus Portugese, French and American traders.

The British, who had first voted to abolish the slave trade more than 60 years earlier, were trying to stop it — not that it suits the Empire-bashing narrative to say so.

The true story behind this extraordinary photo is told in a long-forgotten Victorian memoir called Dhow Chasing in Zanzibar Waters — Five Years' Experience In The Suppression Of The Slave Trade. It is written by the man who took this picture, Captain George L. Sulivan, HMS Daphne's skipper. He was no cold-hearted imperialist.

True, some of his 19th-century language would have him denounced as a racist by today's campus commissars.

But there is no mistaking the motives of a man with a burning passion to stop this 'nefarious' trade in the 'vile cesspools' of the Indian Ocean. Thanks to Capt Sulivan and his men — several of whom died in the process— thousands of enslaved Africans were freed.

The days before his photo was taken involved a series of horrific episodes, including an attack by Somali tribesmen while Capt Sulivan and his men were rescuing several emaciated slave children from a wrecked Arab dhow.

Then, on November 1, the crew of HMS Daphne, a 187ft Amazon-class sloop with a crew of 150, intercepted another dhow and discovered 48 men, 53 women and 55 children imprisoned on board.

'The deplorable condition of some of these poor wretches, crammed into a small dhow, surpasses all description; on the bottom of the dhow was a pile of stones as ballast, and on these stones, without even a mat were 23 women huddled together — one or two with infants; these women were literally doubled up, there being no room to sit erect.


No wonder the National Archives (pictured) chose it to illustrate the 'profoundly oppressive' nature of the British Empire in an exhibition, writes Robert Hardman

'Some of the slaves were in the last stages of starvation and dysentery.

'A woman came up having an infant about a month or six weeks old in her arms with one side of its forehead crushed in.

'On asking how it was done, she told us that just before our boat came alongside the dhow, the child began to cry and one of the Arabs, fearing the English would hear it, took up a stone and struck it . . .' HMS Daphne captured two more dhows that same day.

Conditions on the British ship were certainly basic and would get worse following an outbreak of smallpox which struck both the liberators and liberated.


HMS Dryad, an Amazon-class sloop, sister ship of HMS Daphne


But everyone was fed, washed and attended by the ship's doctor. A few weeks later, more than 300 were put ashore in the Seychelles to begin a new life of liberty while HMS Daphne returned to active duties.

We must never forget the wrongs committed by the British Empire. But every single person in this photograph certainly had good reason to be thankful to it for evermore.


Photograph taken on board HMS Daphne, 1st November 1868
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
The Royal Navy would never have transported slaves on any of their ships. Also, the photo is just too late in British history for slaves like that.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
What an interesting topic, to bad nobody can speak truthfully about it because of it,s semetic Arab history.
The British blockade of African slavery was to foil American separitist acendancy.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
So who are those black people on HMS Daphne's deck?



Obviously it isn't.

They were rescuing the drowning "cargo" of a sinking Slaver, hence the black slaves on the deck of a RN warship, a generation after Britain outlawed slavery.

Nice propaganda, tho.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,486
1,838
113
They were rescuing the drowning "cargo" of a sinking Slaver

Where's your evidence for this?

Nice propaganda, tho.

It's not propaganda. It's the truth. After Britain became the first country to permanently ban slavery in 1807, thanks to the efforts of William Wilberforce and others, Royal Navy ships regularly tracked down American, French and Arab slave ships and slave ships from other less-enlightened countries still practising slavery and liberated their slaves.

HMS Daphne was an Amazon-class sloop, of the Royal Navy, built at the Pembroke Dockyard and launched on 23 October 1866. It spent its entire career east of Suez – in the East Indies and particularly on anti-slavery operations on the East coast of Africa.

It was commissioned at Plymouth on 12 June 1867 by Cdr George Lydiard Sulivan and came back to finally pay off in 1879.

"Each of her commissions lasted four years, and her ever recurring appearance at so many successive slave running seasons earned a tradition of wrath at the mention of her name among the merchants in that line of business", wrote Admiral Ballard in July 1938.[1]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Daphne_(1866)
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
not propaganda. It's the truth. After Britain became the first country to permanently ban slavery in 1807

The second one, after Upper Canada (1793) ...
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Which was governed by whom?

Us ... or the beginnings of of it, anyway. It took 15 years for the antislavery legislation to move upstream.

The Loyalist population that came here after the Revolution had a tradition of self rule going back a hundred years earlier and they did not put up with an imperious colonial British regime, either. The British had to bend a lot to avoid losing these colonies, too.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,486
1,838
113
Us ... or the beginnings of of it, anyway. It took 15 years for the antislavery legislation to move upstream.

Of course, it was John Graves Simcoe, the British Lieutenant Governor of the colony, who was behind the abolition of slavery in Upper Canada.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Of course, it was John Graves Simcoe, the British Lieutenant Governor of the colony, who eas behind the abolition of slavery in Upper Canada.

Yes.He was an abolishionist. He also made the goofy edict that only British place names would do in the new colony, hence London, Stratford, York (is now Toronto), Scarborough, Whitby, Welland, Newark (is now Niagara on the Lake), etc. Ontario.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,486
1,838
113
Yes.He was an abolishionist. He also made the goofy edict that only British place names would do in the new colony, hence London, Stratford, York (is now Toronto), Scarborough, Whitby, Welland, Newark (is now Niagara on the Lake), etc. Ontario.

British place names in a British colony. Yep, very goofy.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Lol.

Blackleaf the pedo is against slavery.

Get stuffed.

But you defend pedos, and oppose the efforts to arrest them and free the slaved children...
...and everyone who supports that.

go figure