Re: Should Journalists use more obtuse language in pieces about Trump?
And the majority of voters didn't vote for him.
And the majority of voters didn't vote for him.
The majority of his voters weren't from the rust belt.
And the majority of voters didn't vote for him.
That too, but whenever you mention that inconvenient fact around here you tend to get the sour grapes response.
I was just wondering, since it seems to be that the press is very soft on him.
I'm not saying that they should write hit pieces or anything, but maybe they should use more appropriate language.
For example, 'Trump is an idiot' is an objective fact.
There's such an unfathomably large sample of evidence to support such a statement as to make it irrefutable.
By sugarcoating their pieces with more sensitive adjectives about him, it feels as if they are doing a disservice to the public and not accurately depicting the extent of his stupidity.
I'm sure you that somehow made sense.
Poverty is at an all time low.
Go worry about terrorism or something.
It takes two to tango. Trump is treating the press like garbage and he should at least expect the same in return.
..Poverty is at an all time low.
Go worry about terrorism or something.
That too, but whenever you mention that inconvenient fact around here you tend to get the sour grapes response.
I'm sure the secret service has bots scurrying the internet for such key words
Flossy should expect a visit from CSIS any time now since those agencies tend to co-operate....
Since this thread is not in a section that is safe from bots..
Free speech.
![]()
Im more worried about social reprogramming brainwashing in my kids school then terrorism
Majority of Canadians didn't vote for trudOWE but we still got saddled with the idiot so what's your point?Or do you even have one besides proving you are a troll?