No question that Obama inherited a mess, but that was never any secret... His first campaign sought to change the course that the US was/is on, and that didn't happen (as if it really could have in a practical sense). But nonetheless, the promises were made and he was elected on those statements.
What I see now (and in the 2nd half of his first term), are actions that take a large risk in hampering their economy further.... All of this grandstanding about 'the wealthy paying their share' is nothing more than playing politics... Even with the proposed tax hikes on wealthy Americans and corps, the total addition to the coffers won't represent a whole number in terms of the US's operating deficit.
On the other hand, the risk is that some of these companies move (Haliburton), work to shelter income (Apple, Nike, Google) or downsize operations (thousands of medium and small business' in response to Obamacare costs)... These actions will have a deleterious effect on employment, but more importantly, on the basic incomes of those in the low and medium income sectors.
So I ask; who has really won, when one weighs all of the risks against the potential rewards?