;-) I think we kinda just said the same things in different cycles....
Ah ok, gotcha now.
;-) I think we kinda just said the same things in different cycles....
Wow, what a political sidestep. LOL
So where do you stand on the violence again?
The same place I have all along.... It's there as a last resort - and be bloody determined....
So do you have a point or are you just fishing for something?
Naw ... I just feel like I'm being interviewed by a head-gamey ex ...![]()
Someone that asks a lot of stupid leading questions in hope of putting their own story together out of what they want someone else to say
If it makes you comfortable.... ;-)You calling me stupid?![]()
If it makes you comfortable.... ;-)
If it makes you comfortable.... ;-)
Would you like a chocolate.
We already knew that's how you pick your articles.That's always a sign of a good article, when it's filled with blatant lies.-
At least you admit it.FAIL.
It isn't about putting 'our own' story together. It's about forcing the opponent to be honest.Someone that asks a lot of stupid leading questions in hope of putting their own story together out of what they want someone else to say
That's not forcing any sort of honesty. It's called badgering, head gaming, cherry-picking for spin - more to do with being an asshole than to get at truth; the version of "honesty" they need (whether it was actually said or not is immaterial) to shout over. Sort of sucks when someone feels the mania to "challenge" honest opinion (opinion being personal viewpoint, not proven fact) just for the sake of post count. It's the hallmark of someone who needs a life - or attention.It isn't about putting 'our own' story together. It's about forcing the opponent to be honest.
You mean like Cannuck's outright lie that put a CEO and his company's reputation in jeopardy?
It is to me. It's funny how many people actually notice me doing it, and comment on it, without me pointing it out.That's not forcing any sort of honesty.
That's your opinion as to why I do it. Unless you added mind reading to your resume, your opinion is based on assumption and is thus very subjective.It's called badgering, head gaming, cherry-picking for spin - more to do with being an asshole than to get at truth; the version of "honesty" they need (whether it was actually said or not is immaterial) to shout over.
I challenge honest opinion with honest well thought out rebuttals. I challenge ideologues with contempt. They aren't worth real effort.Sort of sucks when someone feels the mania to "challenge" honest opinion (opinion being personal viewpoint, not proven fact) just for the sake of post count.
Or entertainment.It's the hallmark of someone who needs a life - or attention.