'We wish nothing more, but we will accept nothing less. Masters in our own house we must be, but our house is the whole of Canada.'
Pierre Elliott Trudeau
Bravo !! and indeed. !!
'We wish nothing more, but we will accept nothing less. Masters in our own house we must be, but our house is the whole of Canada.'
Pierre Elliott Trudeau
Reverend Blair said:You are referring to Martin Luther King Jr. as "...a schizo who is delusional?" Considering that he is recognised around the world because of the influence he had on human rights, I think you should apologise to the world in general.
PoisonPete2 said:bulldog said:PoisonPete2 said:bulldog said:Ocean Breeze said:August 8, 2005
“
Get practical. You cannot afford to spout such rhetoric in time of war. You are so far off base, you are not even in the ballpark. I notice you reference an American. Find me a Canadian of equal importance with something to say on the subject.
Bull Dog
Am I to do things because they are practical, or expedient, or political. I say no. Canada is not at war in Iraq and I am currently petitioning the Canadian leaders to rethink NATO policy in Afghanistan. Do you just follow your leader blindly, like a little puppy dog? No wonder the world is in such a mess.
Seeing the mess the fascists are creating in the U.S.A. I give thanks everyday that I AM CANADIAN
'We wish nothing more, but we will accept nothing less. Masters in our own house we must be, but our house is the whole of Canada.'
Pierre Elliott Trudeau
Nope. Doesn't apply. Foul ball. This is what I have to say about Trudeau since you like over-generalization so much: One of Trudeau's favourite passages in literature, "I'll climb, not high perhaps, but all alone!" Perhaps that is the way the US feels. Ever think of that?
Bull Dog
Hard-Luck Henry said::lol: :lol: :lol: " ... since you like over-generalization so much ... " :lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: I love when Dr Sigmund bulldog chastises the world for "over-generalisation" and "spouting rhetoric". Cheers me up, no end, I must say - she's obviously a topdog psychologist, after all; I feel better already. :lol: :lol: :lol:
:roll:I've got a cattle prod. ZAP!
:wink:peapod said:bulldog said
I notice you reference an American. Find me a Canadian of equal importance with something to say on the subject
Well hows about this...Keeping the Americans out, keeping the French in, and trying to get the Natives to somehow disappear.
Will Ferguson
See bulldog..we don't have to play by yur rules..nah! comedy is much more fun...besides you can find a ego tripping educated twat just about anywhere...but just try and find a good monty python on a rope...
bulldog said:Actually, I am not of the Freudian school. I have told you all what branch of psychology I studied - cognitive. This is a more progressive form of psych, not related to Dr. Sigmund and his silly potty-training theories. My special area of interest is cognitive memory. Hot Dog, I'm feeling pretty frisky since I took a dip in the cement pond.
Bull Dog
bulldog said:PoisonPete2 said:bulldog said:PoisonPete2 said:bulldog said:Ocean Breeze said:August 8, 2005
“
Nope. Doesn't apply. Foul ball. This is what I have to say about Trudeau since you like over-generalization so much: One of Trudeau's favourite passages in literature, "I'll climb, not high perhaps, but all alone!" Perhaps that is the way the US feels. Ever think of that?
Bull Dog
Answer - Gee, I'm a little confused. Clarify if I am wrong. I understand that you were saying that Canada should side with the U.S. if the American government was going to be 'taking Canada down with them - if they go'. I suggest that this would be cowardice. You want a Canadian quote on the subject and I offer Trudeau's 'masters of our own house' quote. That seems to be off base to you. And you imply that I have no compassion for the situation the U.S. finds itself in, as some Paladin fighting soulless extremists. Well excuse me if I am not an advocate for seizing the assets of a non-aggressive country by force of arms and then vilifying its resistance fighters as being 'insurgent or terrorist’.
But this thread is in regard to Iran. In the early 1950s the CIA reinstalled the Shah Pahlavi as dictator in Iran. While introducing some westernization to Iran, he ruled through American trained SAVAK, assassinating or driving out all opposition to his tyrannical rule. The U.S. was content with his repression as the oil flowed. The U.S. applied this pattern of control through ‘puppet’ dictators in many places including: Cuba, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Chilli, Peru, Viet Nam, Egypt, Algiers, Morocco, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, Panama, etc, all with varied degree of failure, but all marked with great suffering to the populations.
A popular movement deposed the Shah in 1979. When the insurgents realized that the U.S. had protected this ruthless bastard, they seized the U.S. Embassy. Canada had to act in order to free the hostages. Always miffed when their plans for dominance goes wrong, the U.S. began to vilify the government of Iran and supported a war of aggression using their client state Iraq, and their good buddy SH. The U.S. has continued black ops and propaganda campaigns against Iran since that time.
Iran has good reason to be concerned for the intentions of the U.S. in the Middle East. Now that the U.S. is sharing its nuclear technology with India and providing Pakistan with advanced avionics it is understandable that Iran would consider the nuclear option for its economic independence and national security.
Of course there are many omissions in this short overview but please feel free to debate the points. But please try to avoid dismissive labels and non-sequitur argument. They reduce the quality of discourse.
As you enjoy Trudeau, here is his view of the USA
“Living next to you is in some ways like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered is the beast, if I can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt.”
Reverend Blair said:You forgot to mention that, between the time they kicked the British out and the time the US installed the shah as their puppet, Iran the formed a rudimentary democracy all on their own, Pete.
Hard-Luck Henry said:bulldog said:Actually, I am not of the Freudian school. I have told you all what branch of psychology I studied - cognitive. This is a more progressive form of psych, not related to Dr. Sigmund and his silly potty-training theories. My special area of interest is cognitive memory. Hot Dog, I'm feeling pretty frisky since I took a dip in the cement pond.
Bull Dog
:lol: :lol: 8O Oops, sorry bulldog; it seems I hadn't realised you were one of the more progressive sort of psychologists. Maybe your saying so (repeatitively, I gather) hasn't made much of an impression? The only thing I can really recall, apart from the ugly dog in your avatar, is small-minded, racist, over generalising bigotry. :roll:
Btw - since you object to 'over-generalization' so much, what on earth does "Perhaps that is the way the US feels" mean? Are nation states actually capable of cognition?
bulldog said:Oh, excuse me again, for being so ugly. How dumb do you have to be to judge a person's looks by their avatar?
Bull Dog
I said:The only thing I can really recall, apart from the ugly dog in your avatar ... "