Re: RE: The Immigrants Poem
What we really need is more labor to build the houses. It (shortage) hurts the contractor, buyer, or both.
No, what I said was that with the exception of the Windsor-Quebec City corridor and the lower mainland in BC, the rest of Canada is relatively underpopulated. The Edmonton-Calgary corridor is still filling out, and could add millions more.
I can understand the arguement in Ontario seeing as how the population is already close to 13 million, however you have to take into account factors such as the economy. The lowermainland BC has only 3 million, but I don't think you would want to grow to more than 4 or 5 million, even with smartgrowth.
This is nonsense to imply that Canada's provincial parks are going to be sacrificed with our current population growth. If Canada had a population over 100 million (and you take into account that most of our population would live in the southern provinces/areas) then I could grasp your concept.
I think Hank C must have just bought a lot of stock in BP Roofing Asphalt Shingles and wants to see a home building boom or something like that because I fail to see why else he would be hellbent on destroying Canada's natural environment in the name of a bigger economy.
What we really need is more labor to build the houses. It (shortage) hurts the contractor, buyer, or both.
Hank C, you mentioned room for growth in lower mainland BC. Do you know all the species currently at risk there? Do you know Vancouver has a higher population density than Shanghai and is experiencing fresh water shortages?
No, what I said was that with the exception of the Windsor-Quebec City corridor and the lower mainland in BC, the rest of Canada is relatively underpopulated. The Edmonton-Calgary corridor is still filling out, and could add millions more.
I can understand the arguement in Ontario seeing as how the population is already close to 13 million, however you have to take into account factors such as the economy. The lowermainland BC has only 3 million, but I don't think you would want to grow to more than 4 or 5 million, even with smartgrowth.
You cannot protect the environment with the growth Canada is undergoing now. If human population grows perpetually all provincial and national parks will be sacrificed once demands reach the critical mass.
This is nonsense to imply that Canada's provincial parks are going to be sacrificed with our current population growth. If Canada had a population over 100 million (and you take into account that most of our population would live in the southern provinces/areas) then I could grasp your concept.