The Canadian rich are getting richer, thanks to their houses

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
The Canadian rich are getting richer, thanks to their houses



A new survey out Monday, on the property wealth of high net worth individuals, should hit some Canadians right where they live.

Bank of Montreal found among its high net worth clients that primary residences were worth almost $1.5 million on average. Those clients were defined as having more than $1 million in investible assets.

On top of that, the survey found 36 per cent of those people own at least one second property worth on average $708,539. The bank says many of those people are tapping into equity in their primary residence to fund those additional property purchases.

BMO didn’t calculate real estate wealth as a percentage of overall wealth, but the bank’s deputy chief economist Doug Porter says property isn’t just making the rich richer – all of us are becoming wealthier.

“Real estate has just been one of the fastest-growing assets,” said Porter, adding land and residential structures now account for about 39 per cent of total Canadian assets. “It’s above average [historically] but I don’t think it’s wildly out of balance.”

That percentage has been stable over the last five years but the economist notes that at one point – at the peak of the technology boom in 2000 – it was as low as 31 per cent.

Those percentages are likely even higher in some pockets of the country, such as British Columbia, where the average principal residence was $3.9 million for the high net worth crowd. Those people carry $236,100 in debt, according to the survey.

Do Canadians own too much property?

Most wealthy Canadians surveyed are free and clear of their mortgage and even among those with debt, the average amount they have outstanding is $176,000.

On the second property front, 80 per cent of respondents who have one, say it is in Canada. Another 27 per cent have property in U.S., 11 per cent in Europe, eight per cent in Central America, South America or the Caribbean, seven per cent in either Mexico or Asia and five per cent in Australia.

Vacation purposes were cited by 47 per cent of respondents with second properties as the number one reason for owning. The second reason for owning was for investment purposes at 39 per cent, followed by income-generating property at 36 per cent.

John Turner, director of program and product development for Canada and Asia for BMO Private Banking, said the issue of too much home ownership depends on the type of real estate Canadians are invested in. Income and investment property should be considered separately from primary residence.

He cautions the larger issue is managing the cash flow. “For those folks overweight in real estate, you can run into a situation where they have a cash flow situation because they are leveraged and can’t afford [payments].”

“You could leverage your property and invest the money,” said Turner.

But diversifying is easier said than done, when it comes to a primary residence. Most people simply do not want to move to limit their exposure to a downturn and that’s not even considering the substantial fees associated with moving.

Elton Ash, regional executive vice-president of Re/Max of Western Canada, said the survey is nothing new to him, especially when it comes to Vancouver.

“I’ll give a scenario. You get an 82-year-old widow in her home for 45 years. The problem for some of these people is that they can’t even pay the property taxes,” said Ash. “It’s not just high net worth people in this boat [with valuable real estate]. It’s just a huge segment of the baby-boomer demographic who have a ton of equity in their home.”

Toronto certified financial Planner Ted Rechtshaffen, chief executive of TriDelta Financial, said clients are often reluctant to tap into home equity to invest, but says that when 50 per cent of your wealth is in your house it’s time to ask questions.

You could leverage your property and invest the money

“There are people who say paying down your mortgage is the ultimate financial move you can make, but I try to tell those people to stop paying more to their mortgage if a majority of their net worth is in real estate,” said Rechtshaffen. “If it makes sense, maximize your RRSP, your TFSA and RESP first. And when you are investing, try to stay away from real estate.”

The last thing he would do is double down on real estate by buying a cottage with equity from your primary residence.

The BMO survey was conducted online by Pollara between Oct. 15 and Oct. 28, 2014, with a sample of 306 Canadians, 18 years of age and older.

source: The Canadian rich are getting richer, thanks to their houses | Financial Post
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
Completely artificial and notional definition of wealth. All real wealth stems from production and value added to material through human labour and ingenuity.

Furthermore that production has to be equitably shared and widely consumed. In a real sense Canada is far poorer than the nation of our parents in the 25 years following WW2.

This sense of 'wealth'.. is in fact a BUBBLE.. set on a foundering real economic infrastructure It is unsustainable and will collapse. These 'shocks' will become ever more calamatous, the intervening 'recovery' period ever shorter, as our industial vitality seeps away.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I would think prices would rise there as people ditch the cold east for rain and green things year round. I would think tunneling into the steep hills would be better than trying to build something solid that is sitting on the rock. The east is where the selling prices will be at 10% market value.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
I would think prices would rise there as people ditch the cold east for rain and green things year round. I would think tunneling into the steep hills would be better than trying to build something solid that is sitting on the rock. The east is where the selling prices will be at 10% market value.

Yes, it's grand living in Vancouver, never seeing the sun for months at a time..
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
That also happen in a blizzard and then you freeze to death. Cloudy weather is not on the 'What can extinct you' list.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
Just because someone has got a house worth a lot of money doesn't mean that person is wealthy in any way.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Just because someone has got a house worth a lot of money doesn't mean that person is wealthy in any way.

You know Bill Gates and a few other Billionaire might disagree with you..

There is not enough money printed in the USA or World to pay off some of the richest citizens.. their holdings are stocks and bonds and in some cases land and buildings (Donald Trump).

Their wealth may be on paper alone, but they can buy the crappy company you work for with the equity in that paper.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,624
8,174
113
B.C.
Yes, it's grand living in Vancouver, never seeing the sun for months at a time..
Actually it is never months between sights of the sun . Usually only days or weeks but don't tell anyone as it is getting to crowded
here already .