Ships are bad for the environment. More steel means more pollution.
petros The Central Scrutinizer Nov 21, 2008 116,996 14,192 113 Low Earth Orbit Apr 6, 2023 #361 Ships are bad for the environment. More steel means more pollution. Reactions: Ron in Regina
Tecumsehsbones Hall of Fame Member Mar 18, 2013 59,995 9,369 113 Washington DC Apr 6, 2023 #362 petros said: Ships are bad for the environment. More steel means more pollution. Click to expand... More windjammers means deforestation. Reactions: petros, Taxslave2 and Ron in Regina
petros said: Ships are bad for the environment. More steel means more pollution. Click to expand... More windjammers means deforestation.
Ron in Regina "Voice of the West" Party Apr 9, 2008 28,844 10,889 113 Regina, Saskatchewan Apr 6, 2023 #363 petros said: Ships are bad for the environment. More steel means more pollution. Click to expand... I thought the ones from the Davie shipyard in Quebec were environmentally friendlier than others build on time and under budget elsewhere though? What about just building metal windjammers in Quebec? There’s gonna be some kind of a compromise here? Reactions: petros
petros said: Ships are bad for the environment. More steel means more pollution. Click to expand... I thought the ones from the Davie shipyard in Quebec were environmentally friendlier than others build on time and under budget elsewhere though? What about just building metal windjammers in Quebec? There’s gonna be some kind of a compromise here?
Ron in Regina "Voice of the West" Party Apr 9, 2008 28,844 10,889 113 Regina, Saskatchewan Mar 7, 2025 #364 Mark Norman: Canada faces a lonely future of isolation — National Post But we are more than capable of looking after ourselves apple.news
Mark Norman: Canada faces a lonely future of isolation — National Post But we are more than capable of looking after ourselves apple.news