Peter Worthington
Mon, September 11, 2006
Five years later, a changed nation
By Peter Worthington
In some ways, the 9/11 terror attack on the U.S. changed Canada more significantly than it did other countries, and certainly more significantly than most Canadians realize.
True, we are emotionally as well as geographically close to Americans, but the events of that terrible day altered us in ways that might not have been anticipated.
For starters, former prime minister Jean Chretien failed to comprehend the poignant impact of the attack on us. His initial public reaction was that there are no terrorist cells in Canada -- thus ignoring years of warnings from CSIS that we are a haven, if not an incubator of some 50 terror cells.
Second, an impromptu rally of some 100,000 Canadians at Parliament Hill in support of the U.S. immediately after 9/11, caught everyone by surprise. A "token" gesture became a pledge of sympathy, solidarity and support for our closest friend and protector.
It's fair to say that ordinary Canadians were ahead of the politicians (and media, if truth be faced) in their reaction to 9/11.
To note that 9/11 was a wake-up call for Canadians is trite, but also true. Suddenly the warnings of CSIS, the RCMP and various police intelligence agencies, as well as military intelligence, about our vulnerability to terror had substance. (Warnings the government had for years rigorously ignored and/or downplayed).
Overnight, fear and unease replaced apathy.
We started to question our immigration and refugee policies more assiduously.
CSIS warnings about funds being collected here for international terrorist groups were no longer dismissed as paranoid rantings of rightwing nutbars.
While Canada's borders are still porous, and while deportation of potential security risks is tedious, complex and slow, at least there is now pressure to tighten controls. Last week Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced border guards would carry guns.
Perhaps the biggest change in Canada is both in our military and the attitude of Canadians toward it. Soldiers are popular -- brave and heroic.
Even the previous Liberal government, whose specialty was denigrating and reducing the military, transformed itself from doves to hawks after 9/11.
Today, five years later, our military is on the path to being combat effective, and not just a nice little peacekeeping outfit incapable of ever fighting a war, as NATO's Lt.-Gen. Sir Hew Pike once remarked, causing outrage from Canada because of its truth.
Military casualties that were ignored during the UN peacekeeping years became headline stories and cause for national mourning after 9/11. Canada once again honoured soldiers it previously had been encouraged to ignore.
Forsaken allies
When the U.S., Britain and Australia decided to take out Saddam Hussein, which the UN refused to do, Canada begged off -- the first time in our history that we've forsaken allies in war.
Reality is we hadn't the military wherewithal to join in the Iraq war, even had we wanted to. Our allies understood this, and if the PM had shown verbal support for ending the tyranny of Saddam, it might have avoided acrimony. Instead, Chretien joined countries that were benefiting financially from Iraq's oil-for-food boondoggle, which also netted agent fees for the UN itself.
Those days are gone. For the moment.
In Afghanistan we are on the front line of the war against terror -- unthinkable five years ago. We also recognize the difference between militant Islamists and ordinary Muslims, where five years ago we couldn't have differentiated.
As a people, we are still tolerant. Some may say we lost our innocence after 9/11, but that's ridiculous rhetoric. What we did was gain reality, and to recognize threats to our way of life.
Although Canada today is different, life goes on. But we've become more aware that just because we feel enmity toward no one, this does not protect us from those who see our values and ethics as something that must be destroyed.
That, in essence, is what the war on terror is about, and why it must be won.
Quiet remembrance of Britain's 9/11 victims by Robin Millard
Sun Sep 10, 11:12 AM ET
LONDON (AFP) - Britain was to mark the fifth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States with a low-key ceremony Monday to remember the Britons killed in the atrocities.
In keeping with the wishes of victims' relatives, the government has not organised any official events to commemmorate the 67 Britons among the 2,973 dead in the Al-Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington.
However, Robert Tuttle, the US ambassador to Britain, was to lead a quiet ceremony at the September 11 memorial garden next to the embassy in London's Grosvenor Square.
A wreath will be laid at in the garden at 1:46 pm (1246 GMT) -- the time the first hijacked plane ploughed into the World Trade Centre in New York as workers started their day.
A small number of families of victims are expected to take part.
In the City of London, the financial heart of the capital, workers were to mark the anniversary with charity fundraising events.
Zara Phillips, Queen Elizabeth II's eldest granddaughter, England cricketer Andrew Flintoff and his Australia counterpart Shane Warne were to help traders take part at inter-dealer bond broker BGC.
BGC and investment bank Cantor Fitzgerald -- which lost 658 members of staff in the attacks, including 12 Britons -- were to donate their global revenues from the day's trading to charity.
Meanwhile, the queen's second son Prince Andrew was to attend a commemoration at the British Memorial Garden in New York where he was due to speak briefly and meet the group of around 25 relatives of British victims expected to attend.
Around 120 British police officers were to take part in memorial events in New York.
The officers, who have funded the trip themselves, will form part of an honour guard at the site of the World Trade Centre.
The stand is to show solidarity with their US counterparts, 60 of whom were killed in the attacks.
Some 67 of the British officers will also provide an honour guard around the perimeter during the British Memorial Garden service, their number representing the Britons killed in the attacks.
Former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher will attend a church service and a commemorative ceremony with US Vice President Dick Cheney, who invited her to Washington.
Afterwards, the 80-year-old baroness will attend a ceremony at the State Department, where she is to meet US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
#juan said:I was shaken, appalled, and saddened when it happened. Since that time, at least 5,000 Afghani civilians who had nothing to do with 9/11 have been bombed to death. Since that time closer to a hundred thousand Iraqi civilians who had nothing to do with 9/11 have been bombed to death. Their lives are at least as important as those who were killed on 9/11. Where is the "Ground Zero" in Afghanistan? Where is the "Ground Zero" in Iraq. Their "Ground Zero", was in their homes and at their work places. We've been asked to cry on the eleventh of September for five years now. When do we cry for the Afghanis and the Iraqis? I understand your point. Try to understand mine.
tracy said:Anyone who has a hard time crying over 9/11 should give his head a shake. Why wouldn't 3000+ people killed give you some feelings of sadness? I don't understand why people can't just acknowledge the horror of that day without bringing in other topics. This isn't about Afghanistan, it isn't about Iraq, it isn't about Rwanda, it isn't about the CIA, it isn't about Bush or Clinton. I don't appreciate the "we've forsaken our allies" bs either.
I remember that day 5 years ago well and I don't like political bickering to take the focus away from simply remembering those that died and what we all lost.
wallyj said:Lest we forget. IRAQ was invaded primarily because they would not allow weapons inspectors into thier country.Saddam was being stubborn and it caused him and his country dearly. The majority of Iraqi's killed have been killed by other Iraqi's,these are not american soldiers strapping bombs on thier chest for a shopping trip.
#juan said:wallyj said:Lest we forget. IRAQ was invaded primarily because they would not allow weapons inspectors into thier country.Saddam was being stubborn and it caused him and his country dearly. The majority of Iraqi's killed have been killed by other Iraqi's,these are not american soldiers strapping bombs on thier chest for a shopping trip.
Wally where did you get that? Iraq was invaded because of the U.S. and British contention that they had weapons of mass destruction. Remember Blair's little speech that Iraq had WMD that could be deployed in forty minutes? Iraq delivered a 1200 page document showing that all restricted weapons had been destroyed. This document was proven to be true and no WMD were found .
fuzzylogix said:tracy said:Anyone who has a hard time crying over 9/11 should give his head a shake. Why wouldn't 3000+ people killed give you some feelings of sadness? I don't understand why people can't just acknowledge the horror of that day without bringing in other topics. This isn't about Afghanistan, it isn't about Iraq, it isn't about Rwanda, it isn't about the CIA, it isn't about Bush or Clinton. I don't appreciate the "we've forsaken our allies" bs either.
I remember that day 5 years ago well and I don't like political bickering to take the focus away from simply remembering those that died and what we all lost.
Tracy, 9/11 was NOT an accident. It was NOT a sad unplanned earthquake, fire or hurricane.
It IS about Afghanistan.
It IS about Iraq.
It IS about Rwanda.
It IS about the CIA.
It IS about Bush, Clinton, Reagan etc.
It IS about Okinawa.
It IS about Sudan.
It IS about Israel.
It IS about the entire world and the relationship of the USA with the world. You can be very sorry for the people killed on 9/11 and for their families and friends.
But if you dont look further than your sympathy, if you try to hide your head in the sand and say it was just a nonspecific terrorist act, then you are kidding yourself. And to prevent further such attacks, you HAVE to look further than just feeling sorry for the lost life.
tracy said:I don't see people why can't put their politics aside to honor the dead for one day. It's like the anti-nuclear people holding a huge rally on Remembrance Day saying what murderers our veterans are and how dare we indulge in such self pity when the people of Japan suffered more than we did? And how dare the Japanese complain when the Rwandans suffer more? And how dare the Rwandans complain when the Cambodians suffered more? And how dare the Cambodians complain when the Jews suffered more?..... And on and on and on and on. Everything doesn't have to lead to a discussion about politics, foreign policy, international relations, etc. or a comparison of who has suffered more. Sometimes you can just say that what happened to those people was horrible.
tracy said:I think people are more likely to take a message with an open mind when it's done tactfully and tastefully. I don't think today is the day.
Wednesday's Child said:I asked them to join me because words alone are not enough to express what needs to be said today.