Tens of thousands raised in horrific animal abuse case

[JLM]

I think you just raised a point that deserves it's own separate thread, Sal. I wonder if there are any psychologists on the forum.


P.S. - Some whackos even get repetitive! -

P.P.S. Or perhaps it's the system getting repetitive first and then the whacko-

 

[gerryh]

listen gerry you are the one who told me to put you on ignore...I told you no, I don't do that...I don't physically put you on ignore. When you do a post that I think is well thought out do I not green you on it? Yes I do. But when you get all crazy and start spouting your caustic remarks because you view something as right and anyone who dares to disagree with you is a piece of offal, well I read right over you. There are a few on here whom you feel you must leave alone or whom you respect. I p iss you off as do a great majority on here. That means any little opportunity you get to make disparaging remarks you take.

I don't do anything from behind a curtain gerry. I just don't respect your ways and when you start ranting, I don't read you at that point. You like to put people down and try to make them small gerry. You have become like the bullies that bullied you. You have become them. You can disparage me as much as you like. It will never work gerry. But yap on and attack when you like. You only hurt yourself.

I didn't attack you, until you decided to attack me. So look in the mirror when you recite the above.

C'mon Gerry. When the topic of nation status for aboriginals comes up, you tell me to get over it...the law is the law and it's already decided. Why can't you accept the same argument when it comes to abortion

No, I think most people know that

As you admit, there is no law considering abortion in Canada. So your question is moot. In Canada, you can kill an unborn right up to delivery. God help you though if you kill a dog or cat.

 

[Cannuck]

As you admit, there is no law considering abortion in Canada. So your question is moot.

No it's not. My point is that there is a difference between moral and lawful.

 

[gerryh]

No it's not. My point is that there is a difference between moral and lawful.

No, you said the law is the law and why can't I accept that concerning abortion... there is no law concerning abortion. I think there should be.

 

[Simple Man]

Geezuz.....not even sure what to say. I wanna say something about panties & gettin' a room & hijack much & stuff but dunno where to start.

I'll just leave it at OMFG.....

 

[Cannuck]

No, you said the law is the law and why can't I accept that concerning abortion... there is no law concerning abortion. I think there should be.

My point is that there is a difference between lawful and moral. Do you disagree

 

[DaSleeper]

Channel 5 News - 2012-02-19 Remy Ong in the doghouse for running over & killing pregnant dog. - YouTube

 

[karrie]

Ya, I'm not surprised that the evisceration of a human baby would be apples and oranges to the cruel death of a dog. The dog should definitely come out on top. Besides, the baby isn't really a human, or a baby any ways. It's a "fetus" which is obviously well below the importance of a dog or cat.

Vets scoop puppies out of dogs and kill them all the time. It's called 'spaying'. They express that option very clearly when you bring a bitch in to be spayed. "If we find puppies, we'll just continue with removal."

Your repeated assertion that dogs and cats have more rights than humans is flawed.

 

[Cannuck]

My point is that there is a difference between lawful and moral. Do you disagree

Well Gerry?

 

[JLM]

Well Gerry?

He's busy, don't bother him!