Rick van Opbergen said:I see. Well I do not think that line of thinking can be equaled to terms of proof or can be given as an explanation.
Rick van Opbergen said:I see. Well I do not think that line of thinking can be equaled to terms of proof or can be given as an explanation.
Rick van Opbergen said:I see. Well I do not think that line of thinking can be equaled to terms of proof or can be given as an explanation.
Can you imagine I thought you were when you started about whales (sharks) which supposably ate these passengers?moghrabi said:Good. First I am not being sarcastic about the disappearance of few hundred people. The US made thousands disappear before.
I agree. But can you also understand that from my point of view, I think "we" need more certainty?moghrabi said:Second, I belive in God but it is hard to prove to you. This is what I meant by convincing evidence.
The stories which circulate around the Internet have spoken about this RUMOR. However, there does not seem to be a base for it. It is often connected with the rumor that no Jews were killed during the WTC attacks. One look in the Portraits Of Grief (New York Times) though suggests otherwise.moghrabi said:Third, you may answer the question about the 5000 or so Jews. But I also like to hear from Stretch.
Can you imagine I thought you were when you started about whales (sharks) which supposably ate these passengers?moghrabi said:Good. First I am not being sarcastic about the disappearance of few hundred people. The US made thousands disappear before.
I agree. But can you also understand that from my point of view, I think "we" need more certainty?moghrabi said:Second, I belive in God but it is hard to prove to you. This is what I meant by convincing evidence.
The stories which circulate around the Internet have spoken about this RUMOR. However, there does not seem to be a base for it. It is often connected with the rumor that no Jews were killed during the WTC attacks. One look in the Portraits Of Grief (New York Times) though suggests otherwise.moghrabi said:Third, you may answer the question about the 5000 or so Jews. But I also like to hear from Stretch.
Can you imagine I thought you were when you started about whales (sharks) which supposably ate these passengers?moghrabi said:Good. First I am not being sarcastic about the disappearance of few hundred people. The US made thousands disappear before.
I agree. But can you also understand that from my point of view, I think "we" need more certainty?moghrabi said:Second, I belive in God but it is hard to prove to you. This is what I meant by convincing evidence.
The stories which circulate around the Internet have spoken about this RUMOR. However, there does not seem to be a base for it. It is often connected with the rumor that no Jews were killed during the WTC attacks. One look in the Portraits Of Grief (New York Times) though suggests otherwise.moghrabi said:Third, you may answer the question about the 5000 or so Jews. But I also like to hear from Stretch.
That comment was meant for Stretch. That's why the comment in my previous post, "This thread is going fast - or am I just being slow?"moghrabi said:What do you mean?
Well I'm certainly not calling you anti-Semitic, but I do want to ask you: how high do you rank the credibility of a rumor like this one, that 5,000 Jews allegedly did not go to work on 9/11?moghrabi said:This is why before I asked you the question I said I don't want to sound anti-Semitic. So you do believe this rumor as I do?
That comment was meant for Stretch. That's why the comment in my previous post, "This thread is going fast - or am I just being slow?"moghrabi said:What do you mean?
Well I'm certainly not calling you anti-Semitic, but I do want to ask you: how high do you rank the credibility of a rumor like this one, that 5,000 Jews allegedly did not go to work on 9/11?moghrabi said:This is why before I asked you the question I said I don't want to sound anti-Semitic. So you do believe this rumor as I do?
That comment was meant for Stretch. That's why the comment in my previous post, "This thread is going fast - or am I just being slow?"moghrabi said:What do you mean?
Well I'm certainly not calling you anti-Semitic, but I do want to ask you: how high do you rank the credibility of a rumor like this one, that 5,000 Jews allegedly did not go to work on 9/11?moghrabi said:This is why before I asked you the question I said I don't want to sound anti-Semitic. So you do believe this rumor as I do?
Rick van Opbergen said:That comment was meant for Stretch. That's why the comment in my previous post, "This thread is going fast - or am I just being slow?"moghrabi said:What do you mean?
Well I'm certainly not calling you anti-Semitic, but I do want to ask you: how high do you rank the credibility of a rumor like this one, that 5,000 Jews allegedly did not go to work on 9/11?moghrabi said:This is why before I asked you the question I said I don't want to sound anti-Semitic. So you do believe this rumor as I do?
Rick van Opbergen said:That comment was meant for Stretch. That's why the comment in my previous post, "This thread is going fast - or am I just being slow?"moghrabi said:What do you mean?
Well I'm certainly not calling you anti-Semitic, but I do want to ask you: how high do you rank the credibility of a rumor like this one, that 5,000 Jews allegedly did not go to work on 9/11?moghrabi said:This is why before I asked you the question I said I don't want to sound anti-Semitic. So you do believe this rumor as I do?
Rick van Opbergen said:That comment was meant for Stretch. That's why the comment in my previous post, "This thread is going fast - or am I just being slow?"moghrabi said:What do you mean?
Well I'm certainly not calling you anti-Semitic, but I do want to ask you: how high do you rank the credibility of a rumor like this one, that 5,000 Jews allegedly did not go to work on 9/11?moghrabi said:This is why before I asked you the question I said I don't want to sound anti-Semitic. So you do believe this rumor as I do?
Rick van Opbergen said:No, but these two rumors are often interconnected. That's my point.