Sweden is world's "goodest" country; UK is fourth

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
Sweden has topped a poll as the best ‒ or “goodest” ‒ country when it comes to serving the interests of its people while avoiding damaging impacts to other nations and the environment.

The country has outranked 162 others to take pole position in the Good Country Index, a league table based on 35 separate indicators from sources including the United Nations and the World Bank.

Sweden scores highest for positive lifestyle contributions including prosperity, equality, health and wellbeing, while also performing well culturally.

The UK ranks fourth in the index.
It is top of the table when it comes to science and technology, which takes into account scientific publications and study, Nobel prizes and patents.

Canada ranks seventh. The US, however, ranks just 21st.

Sweden officially the 'goodest' country in the world, study says


The nation outranked 162 others thanks to its positive lifestyle contributions, including prosperity, equality, health and wellbeing


Mal Siret
@Mal_Siret
Sunday 5 June 2016
183 comments


The index suggests that Sweden, relative to the size of its economy, does more "good" and less harm than any other country Getty Images

Sweden has topped a poll as the best ‒ or “goodest” ‒ country when it comes to serving the interests of its people while avoiding damaging impacts to other nations and the environment.

The country has outranked 162 others to take pole position in the Good Country Index, a league table based on 35 separate indicators from sources including the United Nations and the World Bank.

Sweden scores highest for positive lifestyle contributions including prosperity, equality, health and wellbeing, while also performing well culturally.

Iceland tops the list for its overall contribution to the planet and climate protection, including low CO2 emissions and minimal production of hazardous material, while the UK performs less well in this area, sitting down in 22nd place.

The UK, however, is top of the table when it comes to science and technology, which takes into account scientific publications and study, Nobel prizes and patents.


The UK is the best country when it comes to science and technology, which takes into account scientific publications and study, Nobel prizes and patents. Pictured, a team of Oxford University scientists in 2012 who created a supernova at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxfordshire

The index suggests that Sweden, relative to the size of its economy, does more "good" and less harm than any other country. Smaller countries such as Ireland, Kenya, Iceland and Costa Rica have all dropped in the rankings ‒ this is partly because events around the world make a bigger impact on smaller countries.

The report, which weighs up a country's contributions to the planet and the human race relative to its size ‒ measured in GDP ‒ is the brainchild of leading policy advisor Simon Anholt, whose aim is "to find ways of encouraging countries to collaborate and co-operate a lot more, and compete a bit less".

"A good country is one that successfully contributes to the good of humanity. Of course it must serve the interests of its own people, but never at the expense of other populations or their natural resources: this is the new law of human survival," he said.

He added that the UK must collaborate and cooperate more with other countries: "It [Britain] isn’t just an island unconnected to the rest of Europe or to the rest of the world. Just like every other country on earth, it is part of one system. If it fails, we all fail."

Despite the addition of 38 countries since the first edition of the index, Libya has once again ranked last.


Sweden officially the 'goodest' country in the world, study says | World Politics | News | The Independent
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,593
11,100
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
....and on that note....Referendum offered money for nothing, and the Swiss say 'no' | News Talk 980 CJME

LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Swiss voters overwhelmingly
rejected a proposal that would have guaranteed everyone
in the Alpine nation an unconditional basic income,
according to projections published Sunday by public
broadcaster SRF1.

The plan could have seen people in this wealthy nation
of 8 million people receive about 2,500 Swiss francs
($2,560) per month — enough to cover their basic
needs.

Proponents argued that a basic income would free
people from meaningless toil and allow them to pursue
more productive or creative goals in life. Critics said
the plan would explode the state budget and encourage
idleness, arguments that appear to have convinced voters.

Based on a partial count of results from 19 Swiss
cantons (states), the gfs.bern polling group calculated
that 78 per cent of voters opposed the measure against
22 per cent in favour.

The Swiss government itself advised voters to reject
the proposal put forward by left-wing campaigners who
collected the necessary 100,000 signatures to force a
vote on the issue.

But the idea has won over some economists, who say
it could replace traditional welfare payments and give
everybody the same chances in life.

Salaried workers who earned more than basic income
would have received no extra money, while children
would have received one-quarter of the total for
adults.

The Dutch city of Utrecht is planning a two-year
experiment with a similar plan, handing money to
residents who already receive welfare benefits.

The unconditional basic income proposal was one
of five measures up for decision nationwide Sunday.
Proposals to reform publicly owned companies and
financing of transport routes was rejected, while
voters backed plans to simplify the application
procedures for asylum-seekers and another
that will allow screening of embryos before
they are implanted in the womb.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
What is your opinion on my country Blackster? I already know what Canadians think of us it would be interesting to get a British perspective.

You're all gun-toting, trigger-happy, loudmouth, whooping, hollering lard arses who don't do irony, can't dress properly and can't point to China on a map. You've got no high culture and not much history.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,892
129
63
Us having elected Justine must count for something cuz he's so nice.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
You're all gun-toting, trigger-happy, loudmouth, whooping, hollering lard arses who don't do irony, can't dress properly and can't point to China on a map. You've got no high culture and not much history.
Well let's see. I don't own a gun, or even a pea shooter. I am actually a quiet person. Not a lot to say in real life. I'm about 5"10 and 170 pounds so not really a lard ***. Culture & History? I guess my family has as much as anyone else. So your generalization as flawed and inaccurate as it is, does reveal one truth. You're full of shyt. :).
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,286
2,909
113
Toronto, ON
Well let's see. I don't own a gun, or even a pea shooter. I am actually a quiet person. Not a lot to say in real life. I'm about 5"10 and 170 pounds so not really a lard ***. Culture & History? I guess my family has as much as anyone else. So your generalization as flawed and inaccurate as it is, does reveal one truth. You're full of shyt. :).

I wouldn't take the word of this particular British citizen as what British in general think of you in general. It is probably unwise to do that with any poster on this board.