#juan said:
Colpy wrote:A completely unfair analogy, IMHO.
Unfair? Maybe, but three hundred men, women, and children are just as dead. You want to call it inadvertent? I call it down right uncaring and negligent. In killing three hundred civilians, they got one Hezbolla fighter. Are we to believe the Israelis are incompetent? Not likely, I don't think they give a shit one way or another.
I was just watching a special on CNN on Hezbollah, which is, to my surprize, the fifth largest military in the ME.
Israel is also fighting in Gaza.
Israel is acting AFTER she was attacked. Israel DID NOT attack Hezbollah and kill eight and kidnap two. She was ATTACKED!
I find it VERY hard to believe Israel has killed only one Hezbollah fighter......I would bet that every Hezbollah man killed becomes a civilian the second his carcass hits the ground. I had heard that the ratio was about 8 to one, which is bad enough, but which leaves us with 40 dead Hezbollah......
Not to mention destroyed roads, communications, TV stations, missile sites, training areas, etc, etc.
Israel has to destroy Hezbollah's ability to move around easily before she engages in a ground offensive, and she has to go in on the ground to crush Hezbollah, which IS a major threat, and which attacked her.
DAMN, the west has got to find its cojones, and come out in support of the free, democratic nation acting in its own defense against Hezbollah, the proxies of the murder states of Iran and Syria.
At least Harper knows who our friends SHOULD be.
Edited to say:
And WHO choose to place her missiles, HQs, and training areas in populated spots? Hezbollah is HIDING behind civilians, and (considering the thousands of bombs and shells used by Israel) I think 300 dead is VERY low, evidence of Israel's care.