Should George Bush be charged for commiting war crimes?
- Thread starter JonB2004
- Start date
Re: RE: Should George Bush be
The truth?
The truth is that this ain't about controlling the Iraqi oil fields.
Can't you handle the truth?
JonB2004 said:
The truth?
The truth is that this ain't about controlling the Iraqi oil fields.
Can't you handle the truth?
Since there's no point trying to reason with the Kool-Aid drinkers... check this out for a chuckle:
Summing up a complex man like the US president with only one word...
:lol: :lol:
Summing up a complex man like the US president with only one word...
:lol: :lol:
pastafarian said:
Yeah, I'd agree. The Far Left Kool-Aid drinkers are usually difficult to reason with.
If Bush and Cheney were filmed strangling babies, the Fox dupes would say they were trying to perform CPR. :laughing8: :laughing5:
Re: RE: Should George Bush be
I agree. Being in the back rooms so you can promote the fast tracking of Production Sharing Agreements (pdf) is more of a pleasant bonus than anything else.
boots on the ground, baby. boots on the ground.
Toro said:
I agree. Being in the back rooms so you can promote the fast tracking of Production Sharing Agreements (pdf) is more of a pleasant bonus than anything else.
boots on the ground, baby. boots on the ground.
Re: Comic
Heh, cute comic, pastafarian.
As for suggestions that there doesn't need to be an intelligent debate here because far left-wing "Kool-Aid drinkers" won't "understand", I would suggest you give people more credit than that. It's important that we collectively exhaust our talking points, so that we can consider what has been said, and develop informed opinions on the subject matter.
Heh, cute comic, pastafarian.
As for suggestions that there doesn't need to be an intelligent debate here because far left-wing "Kool-Aid drinkers" won't "understand", I would suggest you give people more credit than that. It's important that we collectively exhaust our talking points, so that we can consider what has been said, and develop informed opinions on the subject matter.
People who think the Iraq war is about "spreading democracy" or "liberating the Iraqi people" don't need to bother with "reason": their president talks to God... 
Debating the useful idiots part #354,166:
Debating the useful idiots part #354,166:
RE: Should George Bush be
BitWhys
Iraqi oil production has fallen from 3 million barrels a day a few decades ago to around 1.5-1.7 mm b/d. The equipment is old and dilapitated, and the technical ability of the Iraqi companies are lagging, to say the least.
If you want to develop the oil fields, where would you get the technology and capital to do so?
BitWhys
Iraqi oil production has fallen from 3 million barrels a day a few decades ago to around 1.5-1.7 mm b/d. The equipment is old and dilapitated, and the technical ability of the Iraqi companies are lagging, to say the least.
If you want to develop the oil fields, where would you get the technology and capital to do so?
Re: RE: Should George Bush be
oh right absolutely. I'd sign as many you-can't-lose-first-blood contracts with the first rich bastard the US Embassy sends my way. no question about it. I've got books to balance for the Paris Club's front men after all. That last tranche is a whopper.
Toro said:
oh right absolutely. I'd sign as many you-can't-lose-first-blood contracts with the first rich bastard the US Embassy sends my way. no question about it. I've got books to balance for the Paris Club's front men after all. That last tranche is a whopper.
Re: RE: Should George Bush be
For the War for Oil Moonbats, if The War was only about Iraqi Oil the United States would have bought off Saddam like France, Germany and Russia did rather then almost spending at least1 Trillion when everything is said and done and losing over 2,300 American Soldiers.
Iraq's Oil Industry was in disaray from years of neglect by Saddam.Toro said:
For the War for Oil Moonbats, if The War was only about Iraqi Oil the United States would have bought off Saddam like France, Germany and Russia did rather then almost spending at least1 Trillion when everything is said and done and losing over 2,300 American Soldiers.
FiveParadox, keep fighting the good fight, I'll watch.
But this isn't even a liberal/conservative, socialist/capitalist thing anymore.
Intelligent conservatives are embarrassed by the Bush regime.
The ones who are left supporting Bush don't want "informed opinion"; it is their enemy. They want vitriol, like Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Horowitz and the other drooling attack-dogs.
They want to be spoon-fed pablum so they can curl up in their limited little ideologies, protected from the Bad People. You can lead an idiot to reality, but you can't make him accept it
Re: RE: Should George Bush be
Or, you can be like Mexico, with massive reserves of natural gas, but importing gas from Texas because they don't have the capital or technical ability to get enough out of the ground for their own domestic consumption.
BitWhys said:
Or, you can be like Mexico, with massive reserves of natural gas, but importing gas from Texas because they don't have the capital or technical ability to get enough out of the ground for their own domestic consumption.
If anyone should be embarrassed it's people like you.pastafarian said:
People like you are truly the idiots, who keep having the Conspiracy Theories and the propaganda spoon fed to them because in the end it's all you have to believe your own BS.
FiveParadox, i should probably be a bit more clear, and for Toro too, since I have seen him use reason in an economic debate: I'll debate lots of things. But i'm not going to debate whether or not Alberta is located on the moon, whether Hitler was basically a decent person, but misunderstood, whether cars use little monkeys on treadmills to power them, whether Noah actually built a boat and collected two of every animal or whether Bush invaded Iraq for any of the different sets of reasons he stated. Actually, the Noah thing is more likely...
There was a time when a case could have been made for attacking Iraq, but after the Downing Street memo, the plagiarism of a Journal of Middle east Studied paper used as evidence, the Niger Uranium fiasco along with the treasonous "outing" of Valerie Plame, reports from the IAEA about Iraq's supposed nuclear capacity, the lies about connection between Saddam and 9/11 and so on and so on...
There was a time when a case could have been made for attacking Iraq, but after the Downing Street memo, the plagiarism of a Journal of Middle east Studied paper used as evidence, the Niger Uranium fiasco along with the treasonous "outing" of Valerie Plame, reports from the IAEA about Iraq's supposed nuclear capacity, the lies about connection between Saddam and 9/11 and so on and so on...
Re: RE: Should George Bush be
please
there's a huge difference between a decent drilling contract and being taken advantage of. Production Sharing Agreements, especially for development of known reserves like what's getting snapped up in Iraq, are an oil company's dream.
funny how that worked out. like I said. bonus.
Toro said:
please
there's a huge difference between a decent drilling contract and being taken advantage of. Production Sharing Agreements, especially for development of known reserves like what's getting snapped up in Iraq, are an oil company's dream.
funny how that worked out. like I said. bonus.