The entire AGW myth is solely about money and moreso, transactions... How many transactions can the UN, Gore, Sukuki, et al get in the middle of such that they can carve-off a small chunk to enable their self-imposed dynasties?
IF those proponents of AGW are sincere about their belief, then this IS about the number of carbon/ghg emitters (read: population) that are in the equation.... Full stop... Only an @sshole would think otherwise.
Energy supplies, availability of foodstuffs, etc are only a symptom of what is a larger issue, and not that I agree with AGW (obviously, I don't), it is laughable that these schysters don't have the balls to recognize what is the end-game of their own feeble argument.
If we truly were in a crisis situation would we be seeing this: Imported Chinese solar panels to be subject to stiff duties in Canada - The Globe and Mail on top of a 600% mark up on wholesale?
Solar panels and whirlygigs will never bring financial improvements to rural villages in Botswana for example. Sure they will have light bulbs and small quantities of RO water but then there is zero incentive for Govts to tie them into the grid with enough energy for light industry.
It's huge "go f-ck yourself" to the poor and will keep them oppressed and impoverished.