Russian spy poisoning: Nerve agent inspectors back UK

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,945
1,910
113
The international chemical weapons watchdog has confirmed the UK's analysis of the type of nerve agent used in the Russian ex-spy poisoning.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons did not name the nerve agent as Novichok, but said it agreed with the UK's findings on its identity.

Russia, which denies it was behind the attack in Salisbury, called the allegations an "anti-Russian campaign".

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said: "There can be no doubt what was used."


Russian spy poisoning: Nerve agent inspectors back UK

12 April 2018
BBC News


In the days after the poisoning, specialist officers wore protective suits at the scene in Salisbury

The international chemical weapons watchdog has confirmed the UK's analysis of the type of nerve agent used in the Russian ex-spy poisoning.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons did not name the nerve agent as Novichok, but said it agreed with the UK's findings on its identity.

Russia, which denies it was behind the attack in Salisbury, called the allegations an "anti-Russian campaign".

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said: "There can be no doubt what was used."

He added: "There remains no alternative explanation about who was responsible - only Russia has the means, motive and record."

But Maria Zakharova, from the Russian Foreign Ministry, said the allegations in relation to the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal were a "clear anti-Russian campaign, the like of which we have not seen in the world for a long time in terms of its scale and lack of principles".

She accused the British authorities of ignoring the "norms of international law, the principles and laws of diplomacy, the elementary rules of human ethics".

And she claimed no one except for British authorities had seen the Skripals for more than a month.

She drew comparisons with the case of Alexander Litvinenko, the ex-KGB agent who died in 2006 in London, adding that at least a photograph of Litvinenko had appeared after his poisoning.

A team from the OPCW visited the UK on 19 March, 15 days after the Skripals were found slumped on a park bench in Salisbury and taken to hospital, along with a police officer who was among the first on the scene.

Ms Skripal was discharged from hospital on Monday but the 33-year-old has said her father is "still seriously ill".


Sergei Skripal remains in hospital but his daughter Yulia has been discharged

The OPCW said it received information about the medical conditions of the Skripals and Det Sgt Nick Bailey, it collected their blood samples, and it gathered samples from the site in Salisbury.

Mr Johnson said the UK had invited the OPCW to test the samples "to ensure strict adherence to international chemical weapons protocols".

UK inspectors from the defence research facility at Porton Down in Wiltshire first identified the nerve agent as belonging to the Novichok group.

The OPCW does identify the toxic chemical by its complex formula but only in the classified report that has not been made public.

In its summary, which has been published online, the report notes the toxic chemical was of "high purity".

The BBC's diplomatic correspondent James Landale said: "This is understood to strengthen the argument that this substance came from Russia because it is more likely to have been created by a state actor with the capability to make the nerve agent."

The report does not name the source of the nerve agent, a subject which is beyond the remit of the inspectors.

The UK has called for a UN Security Council meeting on the OPCW report, likely to be held next week.

What are Novichok agents?

The name Novichok means "newcomer" in Russian, and applies to a group of nerve agents developed by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s.

Novichok's existence was revealed by chemist Dr Vil Mirzayanov in the 1990s, via Russian media. He says the nerve agents were designed to escape detection by international inspectors.

Novichok agents are liquids, although others are thought to exist in solid form and could be dispersed as an ultra-fine powder.

Some of the agents are also said to be "binary weapons", meaning the nerve agent is typically stored as two less toxic chemical ingredients that are easier to handle.

When these are mixed, they react to produce the active toxic agent which can cause convulsions, shortness of breath, profuse sweating and nausea.


Russian spy poisoning: Nerve agent inspectors back UK - BBC News
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
BS..

We have NOT forgotten tony blair and the iraqi wmd "hit london in 40 minutes" scam or this:

Dr David Kelly: 10 years on, death of scientist remains unresolved for some.

Death of WMD dossier scientist contributed to erosion of trust in politics
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jul/16/david-kelly-death-10-years-on
That is how the fakenews war machine treats people who tell the truth.

Just by the behavior of the british government as this progressed is proof enough to any one with common sense that this is a total con job.

So WE know where this blatant propaganda should be shoved:
(*)
!!
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,945
1,910
113



MAX HASTINGS: It is truly terrifying how many people will swallow Putin's lies amid Russian denials of complicity in the Syrian gas attack or the attempted murder of the Skripals

By Max Hastings for the Daily Mail
10 April 2018


President Bashar Assad. He has been blamed for a chemical weapons attack in Syria

All instruments of death are ugly, but chemical weapons invite special repugnance.

In Syria on Saturday, such horrors were nonetheless unleashed. Scores of civilians died, many of them women and children.

If President Bashar Assad was the immediate perpetrator, Vladimir Putin is his mentor and armourer.

The US has led Western nations in promising a fierce response if the allegations are confirmed, as were earlier charges of the same kind.

Britain seems almost certain to make a military contribution to an exemplary Western reprisal operation.

Yet it is doubtful that more than a fraction of the peoples of the Western democracies take this enormity as seriously as it deserves, because they find it so hard to decide whom to believe, about Syria or anything else.

Here is an amazing reflection of our 21st century lives.

We receive daily dumper-trucks of information, on a scale unprecedented in history.

We are bombarded with film, satellite images, Instagram shots, bulletins, news flashes about all manner of happenings worldwide, private and public.

Yet instead of being the best-informed generation of all time, we become ever more baffled about what is true, and whom to trust.

The old, calm certainties that once derived from the BBC’s Nine O’Clock News and the pronouncements of the Good and Great have been displaced by a cacophony of rival claims, competing narratives advanced by spokesmen and interest groups, tweeters and Facebookers.

One of the foremost beneficiaries of this info-chaos is Russia’s president.


'Contrary to the foolish remark of Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Putin (pictured) is not Adolf Hitler, nor even Joseph Stalin'

Contrary to the foolish remark of Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Putin is not Adolf Hitler, nor even Joseph Stalin. He is, instead, the boss of a sprawling gangster state.

The Russian leader has made a cold calculation.

He has no ideas about how to make his own country stronger. He can exert global influence, however, by making others weaker.

Thus, he pursues a brilliantly sophisticated programme of mischief-making, some of it lethal, backed by propaganda and falsehoods which command an audience among gullible Westerners led by Jeremy Corbyn.

These people are likely to believe yesterday’s Russian denials of complicity in the Syrian gas attack, just as they are attracted by Moscow’s crazy assertion that British agents tried to kill the Skripals in Salisbury.

In a new book entitled The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America, the Yale historian Timothy Snyder explains the systematic campaign by Putin to undermine law-based democracies.

As for the lies that the president peddles to his own people, the author describes the success of the crazy Kremlin narrative: that Russia is threatened by a mix of Nazism and Western decadence symbolised by homosexuality.

The election of Donald Trump and the fracturing of the EU are hailed by the Kremlin as important successes for its own gameplan, though I personally do not believe that the US election was swung by collusion between Trump and the Kremlin.

In the Middle East, Putin empowers Assad to clamber over an ever-rising mountain of corpses, because having adopted Syria’s president as his client, he is determined that the brute should be seen to prevail.

Russia values its Syrian naval base on the Mediterranean. Even more important, given its fear of its own Muslim minority, it wants to see Syria’s Islamic State fanatics crushed.


'The election of Donald Trump (pictured) and the fracturing of the EU are hailed by the Kremlin as important successes for its own gameplan'

Finally, Russian cosiness with Turkey and Iran dismays the West, and thus pleases the Kremlin.

So far, the cost has been low, of creating this cocktail of misery and anarchy.

Many Westerners still feel no great animosity toward Putin, because they believe that all national governments behave as badly as each other – think of Bush, Blair and Iraq.

Those of us fortunate enough to live in countries where freedom and law prevail need constantly to remind each other that we do not exist amid an international equipoise of wickedness.

Our system offers its peoples incomparably more than life under the tyrannies of Putin, China’s Xi Jinping, the mullahs of Iran or Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

To sustain civilised societies we must preserve an international order with some obedience to rules, including those that ban chemical weapons.

The attack on the Skripals, assuredly by Russian agents, was an outrage not merely against the victims, but also against Britain, because Putin sought to demonstrate that his killing writ runs in Wiltshire as in Siberia.


'The attack on the Skripals (pictured), assuredly by Russian agents, was an outrage not merely against the victims, but also against Britain'

We must not accept either the Salisbury poisoning or the gas attack in Syria as the new normal, merely because some tyrants – for Putin is only the foremost – behave in such ways. Instead, we need to fight back.

Our principal weapon must be truth, restoration of faith among Western peoples that our values deserve to prevail; that our leaders can be trusted, as Putin and his kind cannot.

Last year an American academic named Tom Nichols published an important book about the decline in respect for expertise and leadership of all kinds, whether in the field of human health or international relations.

He wrote: ‘Conspiracy theories are attractive to people who have a hard time making sense of a complicated world and little patience for boring, detailed explanations.

Unless some sort of trust and mutual respect can be restored, public discourse will be polluted by unearned respect for unfounded opinions.

In such an environment anything and everything becomes possible, including the end of democracy.’

It is, of course, a challenge for the West to launch a counter-attack in the name of honesty and decency when its foremost standard-bearer, Donald Trump, himself makes no pretence of fidelity to truth.

His popularity with his own partisan constituency has been created by exploiting the very weapons employed by Putin and Xi.


'Our own Foreign Secretary (pictured) makes Britain appear ridiculous by habitually inserting a foot in his own mouth before opening it, in the name of this country'

The President of the United States daily presents a narrative of events unrecognisable by most objective observers – yet which his followers embrace uncritically. He generates his own travesty of truth.

Meanwhile, our own Foreign Secretary makes Britain appear ridiculous by habitually inserting a foot in his own mouth before opening it, in the name of this country.

With such people responsible for making the case for the democracies, it is unsurprising that many Western voters struggle to believe that their own governments’ pronouncements deserve more respect than those of the Kremlin, whether about chemical weapons, Ukraine, or whether it is Monday or Tuesday.

This is a shocking state of affairs.

We have entered a world in some ways scarier than that of the Cold War. In those days, for all their nuclear terrors, few among us, or even those who lived under communist regimes, doubted that Western freedoms deserved to prevail.

Today, those with access to platforms in the media as well as politics need to launch a new crusade, to persuade our own peoples that, for all the limitations of our societies and many of their current leaders, Western values remain vastly superior to those of our enemies.

We do not use chemical weapons, nor do we have our domestic critics murdered. Such people as Vladimir Putin do both.

We must become far more savvy in combating Kremlin disinformation, so that the BBC website realises the folly of leading its story on the gas attack – as it did yesterday – by headlining Russia’s denial.

This is not objectivity, but instead mere naivete. It is unnecessary to understand the wild complexities of the Syrian war to see that those seeking to win it by gassing women and children deserve to become global pariahs.

It is welcome that the British Government appears willing to join in a reprisal operation against the monstrous Syrian regime.

Yet it needs also to do more, here at home: The friends of the Kremlin with lavish homes in Kensington need to be sent packing from London.

And the leaders of the Western democracies must understand that we are now in a struggle with Russia that embraces not only resistance to its acts of aggression, but also to make our truth prevail over Putin’s falsehoods.

Read more: MAX HASTINGS: It is terrifying how many will swallow Putin's lies | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
What’s BZ? OPCW may’ve misidentified nerve agent used in Skripal poisoning, Lavrov says

[youtube]qKrwXhmEiw0[/youtube]

Russia's foreign minister has claimed the international chemical weapons watchdog - the OPCW - may have misidentified the type of nerve agent used against the Skripals in England last month. More details now from Hanisha Sethi.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
What’s BZ? OPCW may’ve misidentified nerve agent used in Skripal poisoning, Lavrov says

[youtube]qKrwXhmEiw0[/youtube]

Russia's foreign minister has claimed the international chemical weapons watchdog - the OPCW - may have misidentified the type of nerve agent used against the Skripals in England last month. More details now from Hanisha Sethi.

BREAKING!

RT LIVE!

FROM RUSSIA!


You're not very convincing at this propaganda thing, are you?