Remaining 27 EU member states face difficult task to replace British money

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
It's no wonder many politicians in the remaining 27 EU member states are dead against Brexit.

The EU must brace itself for a 'shock' when it comes to filling the hole in its budget left by Britain's €10billion (£8.5bn) a year contributions, a Brussels think-tank has warned.

The remaining 27 member states will have to decide whether to increase their share of budget contributions, cut spending or a combination of the two, the report said.

But the research by the Jacques Delors Institute warned there is 'no easy way to fill the "Brexit gap" of around €10billion per year'.

Overall, Britain's contribution to the EU is behind Germany, France, and Italy. However, on a net basis, Britain is the second largest contributor to the EU budget after Germany. Despite having similar sized economies, France receives around twice as much money from the EU budget as Britain does...

Brexit will deal a 'shock' to the EU's budget, Brussels think-tank warns as it says there is 'no easy way' to replace Britain's £8.5bn a year contributions


Without the UK, EU budget would face a 'permanent funding gap,' report warns

Member states will either have to increase their share of budget contributions or the EU will have to cut spending

'Brexit gap' could pit rich and poor nations against each other in a budget war

By Matt Dathan, Political Correspondent For Mailonline
18 January 2017

The EU must brace itself for a 'shock' when it comes to filling the hole in its budget left by Britain's €10billion (£8.5bn) a year contributions, a Brussels think-tank has warned.

The remaining 27 member states will have to decide whether to increase their share of budget contributions, cut spending or a combination of the two, the report said.

But the research by the Jacques Delors Institute warned there is 'no easy way to fill the "Brexit gap" of around €10billion per year'.


The remaining 27 member states will have to decide whether to increase their share of budget contributions, cut spending or a combination of the two, the report said. The current budget contributions each member state currently makes is pictured above, in billions. Overall, Britain's contribution to the EU is behind Germany, France, and Italy. However, on a net basis, Britain is the second largest contributor to the EU budget after Germany. Despite having similar sized economies, France receives around twice as much money from the EU budget as Britain does

It will pit rich and poor member states against each other in what could become a hostile budget war in the upcoming negotiations on the bloc's income, set for next year, the report said.

This prospect 'spells trouble' for the budget negotiations. Net contributors such as Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden have complained in the past at having to pay extra payments to subsidise nations such as Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.

The policy paper, titled 'Brexit and the EU Budget: Threat or Opportunity,' warns: 'It is clear that Brexit will deal a shock to the EU budget.'

It adds: 'Overall, we find that Brexit could have a quite significant, although not devastating, impact on the EU budget and would likely deepen the existing cleavage between ‘net contributors’ and ‘net recipients’.


The research by the Jacques Delors Institute warned there is 'no easy way to fill the "Brexit gap" of around €10 billion per year'

'This poses a number of tough challenges for the EU but could also support efforts to reform the current system.'

Detailing the scale of the hole in EU finances, the policy paper says: 'We estimate that the ‘Brexit gap’ in the budget would amount to approximately €10 billion per year.

'The EU Member States need to decide whether to adjust to this shortfall by (1) increasing national contributions, (2) cutting spending, or (3) a combination of the two. We draw up scenarios that illustrate the consequences of each option for individual countries.'

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
If the EU had cut spending years ago Brexit probably wouldn't be happening.

There's the fleet of chauffeur-driven limos which carry the EU bureaucrats around. They must cost a few bob.

And then there's the EU's new eyesore Europa building - the "Egg in a Cage" - in Brussels which cost £270 million, whilst the home of the British Parliament - the Palace of Westminster - is crumbling and in dire need of repairs.



British taxpayers have also forked out £300 million so far on paying for the entire EU Parliament to up sticks and move to Strasbourg in eastern France every MONTH for no reason other than the arrogant French want it to be on their soil every now and then.

The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) also costs each British taxpayer around £400 each year to fund mainly French inefficient "farmers" who do nothing each day but grow rich from the proceeds. And what do we get in return? Photos in British newspapers of French "farmers" posing in front of the sports cars they bought off British taxpayers' money.

And there's all the billions in bailout money the British gave to the hapless Greeks and Irish.

Well, I'm sorry, but the remaining 27 EU member states are going to have to get used to life without their big cash cow.