Refugee/Migrant Crisis

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
24,972
8,971
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I continue to be weirded out by the unfamiliar, almost uncanny nature of what I think we can call Canada’s immigration crisis — i.e., the apparent effects on labour markets, housing, services and infrastructure of an ill-managed and virtually unprecedented deluge of humanity. (And, no, I don’t think the super-immigration of the homesteading era qualifies as a precedent.)

What’s unfamiliar about this is that critiques of government immigration policy have been led, in Canada, almost exclusively by economists. There is as yet no sign of widespread populist revolt against very high immigration; it is the bean-counters, the nerdy jugglers of abstractions, who are losing their patience with Liberal heedlessness.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
24,972
8,971
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The consequences of the federal government’s out-of-control immigration policy will be felt both in the short term and for many years to come.

In this year’s first quarter, the number of temporary residents in this country grew to 2.8 million.

Temporary workers, including international students, people here on work permits and asylum seekers, now make up a whopping 6.8% of the overall population, up from 3.3% two years ago.

In the short term, that puts pressure on social services supporting newcomers, some of whom rely on churches and charities for shelter.

This isn’t sustainable. While Immigration Minister Marc Miller announced in March the government would reduce temporary residents to 5% of the total population, he continues to open the door wider.

At the end of May, Miller increased the number of applications this country would accept from those fleeing war in Gaza. Those applicants can bring in other family members and they’ll receive three months of free health care. In the long term, this is putting stress on housing, health care and schools.

To put those numbers in context, when Stephen Harper was prime minister in 2014, 260,000 immigrants came to Canada, including 23,286 refugees.
Canada has always welcomed newcomers with open arms, but it was done responsibly and carefully. The Trudeau government says one thing and does another. It says it will curtail immigration, then opens the back door wider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
36,964
3,198
113
As Trudeau botches immigration, poll shows falling support
Polls shows well over half of Canadians believe we are letting too many newcomers into the country.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Jul 26, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

The Trudeau Liberals have broken Canada immigration system and with it, public support for that system.

And now we have the numbers to back that up thanks to a poll by Leger for the Association of Canadian Studies.

According to Leger’s findings, 60% of Canadians now believe we have too many immigrants coming into Canada.

That’s almost two-thirds of the population saying we are bringing in too many people compared with 28% who believe it is just the right amount, 9% who said they didn’t know and 3% who said we aren’t bringing in enough people. If we go back just five years ago to 2019, 49% believed we were bringing in the right amount of people, 35% said too many, 12% said too few and 3% didn’t have an answer.

That is a shocking change over five years and the opposition to the high number of newcomers is widespread.



In Alberta, 67% say there are too many newcomers compared to 62% in Ontario and 61% in Quebec. In Toronto, 64% agree there are too many newcomers, it’s 59% in Montreal saying that and 55% in Vancouver.

The poll even breaks down how people feel based on whether they are white or non-white. Among those who identified as white, 62% said there were too many immigrants compared to 55% who identified as non-white.

The question is how did we get here?

The answer may be complicated but can be summed up in one phrase – bad management.

For years, the Trudeau government has been pushing to increase immigration on all fronts. We went from taking in roughly 250,000-300,000 people per year as permanent residents to pushing towards 500,000.


Beyond permanent residents, we’ve also increased the number of temporary foreign workers and temporary foreign students. On the asylum seeker side of the equation, we’ve gone from 4,000-10,000 people a year a decade ago to 72,000 last year and another 30,000 in the first five months of this year.

“Over the past few years, we’ve seen a massive spike in temporary immigration, whether it’s temporary foreign workers or whether it’s international students, in particular, that have grown at a rate far beyond what Canada has been able to absorb,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in April.

If only Trudeau knew someone he could call to try and fix this problematic spike in immigration numbers.

In addition to saying we were bringing in people faster than we could absorb them, which is contributing to the housing crunch, Trudeau also said that in some sectors, all this surplus labour is pushing down wages.



For months now, Statistics Canada has been warning that population growth, driven exclusively by immigration, is outpacing job growth, which is one reason why Canada’s unemployment rate rose from 5% in the spring of 2023 to 6.4% now.

The Trudeau government has promised to reduce the number of non-permanent residents, be they temporary foreign workers or students, but just this week, the Bank of Canada cast doubt on the government’s ability to do that. Not surprising given that in the first five months of this year the federal government approved 216,000 student permits compared to 200,000 the previous year.


An 8% increase can’t be sold as a cut no matter how you look at it.

Canada’s immigration system worked and was well supported in the past because it was orderly and reliable. The current system is failing us because we have abandoned orderly and reliable in favour of embracing chaos.

It’s time for the Trudeau government, starting with Immigration Minister Marc Miller, to take control of the system. That would include lowering the number of non-permanent residents being accepted, stopping the flow of asylum claimants, most of whom are economic migrants jumping the queue and ensuring an orderly flow for new permanent residents.

Canada has for the most part escaped the anti-immigrant wave that has swept many parts of the world. That won’t last if the government doesn’t fix what is clearly a broken and out of control system.

blilley@postmedia.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
36,964
3,198
113
Canadians becoming more sharply divided over record high immigration quotas: Study
'Half of Canadians, 51%, agree immigrants need to do more to integrate into Canadian society'

Author of the article:Kevin Connor
Published Jul 29, 2024 • Last updated 16 hours ago • 1 minute read

New federal data shows Canadians are more divided over record high immigration quotas due to concerns such as housing shortages and foreigners “causing Canada to change in ways they don’t like.”


“Half of Canadians, 51%, agree immigrants need to do more to integrate into Canadian society,” said in-house research by the Department of Immigration, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.

“Just under half of Canadians, 46%, agree Canada should focus on helping unemployed Canadians rather than looking for skilled immigrants to fill labour shortages.”

The Canadians questioned also expressed unease with the social impact of immigration. “About one quarter of Canadians, 27%, agree immigration is causing Canada to change in ways they don’t like,” said the report, title 2024 Annual Tracking Study.

Support for immigration was “accompanied with an attitude of ‘not right now’ or ‘how are we going to make this work?'” wrote researchers. “This sentiment was partly underpinned by concerns about the impact of immigration on infrastructure.”


The immigration department paid Ipsos $295,428 for the study which involved questionnaires with 3,000 people nationwide and 14 focus groups.


The federal government’s current Immigration Levels Plan sets the 2024 quota at 485,000, a number that those surveyed “could not fathom” how cities would handle.

That quota was “too many” for 52% in Alberta, 51% in Nova Scotia, 49% in Ontario and Prince Edward Island, 47% in Saskatchewan, 46% in British Columbia and Newfoundland and Labrador, 43% in New Brunswick, 38% in Quebec, and 37% in Manitoba.

Asked if immigration had a net “negative effect” on their province, 41% of Ontarians surveyed said yes, while a third of Prince Edward Islanders, 33%, and 27% of Albertans said immigration was a net negative.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,312
993
113
One of the problems is that there are so few Canadians left with skills to share or businesses left to employ them. Mostly Canadians are good bureaucrats which costs a lot of money for next to no return and also something no one really needs. In some ways it is sad that people go through life clinging to superficialities and sacrificing their lives in pursuit of. No question it is a great life if you want to waste it being a bureaucrat.

Farming and construction are more rewarding but of course involve work. Then again if you never have to make money or balance the books... why work?
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
36,964
3,198
113
Feds headed in 'wrong direction' on immigration: Privy Council survey
Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Jul 30, 2024 • 2 minute read

It doesn’t get any clearer.


Of the people surveyed by the Privy Council Office, 100% said the federal cabinet is “headed in the wrong direction” when it comes to immigration, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.

“Asked whether they felt the government of Canada was on the right or wrong track when it came to managing the immigration system, all believed it was headed in the wrong direction,” said a Privy Council report.

“It was strongly believed the rate of immigration needed to be temporarily stabilized.”

The federal government’s immigration levels plan has quotas of 485,000 people in 2024, another 500,000 in 2025 and 500,000 more in 2026.


These figures don’t include 1,040,985 foreign students and 766,250 migrant workers let into Canada in 2023.

“Several expressed the view that the rate of immigration had been too high in recent years and that action needed to be taken to temporarily reduce the number of people coming to Canada, including refugees and those seeking asylum,” said the report Continuous Qualitative Data Collection of Canadians’ Views.

“It was felt that the current capacity of infrastructure and vital services could not accommodate further increases to the population and that a priority needed to be placed on supporting those already living in Canada.”

The research was based on focus groups across Canada done under an $814,714 contract with Toronto-based pollster The Strategic Counsel.


The other big observation in the report was that immigration should be restricted to foreigners who fill labour shortages.

“It was felt a priority should be placed on more targeted immigration going forward with a primary focus on bringing in skilled workers in areas such as health care and education, which were believed to be facing widespread labour shortages at present,” said researchers.

Respondents felt current immigration policy merely added costs.

“A number identified what they viewed as a higher rate of immigration in recent years as a contributing factor to rising housing costs,” wrote researchers.

“It was believed that as more people entered the country, the increasing demand for housing had driven up housing prices even further.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
36,964
3,198
113
Attorneys for man charged with killing Georgia nursing student ask judge to move trial
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Sudhin Thanawala
Published Aug 02, 2024 • 2 minute read

Campus-Death-Georgia
Ibarra was arrested on charges that included murder and kidnapping in the death of 22-year-old nursing student Laken Hope Riley in Athens, Ga.
ATHENS, Ga. — Attorneys for a man accused of killing a nursing student whose body was found on the University of Georgia campus have asked a judge to move the case to another county.


Finding an impartial jury in Athens-Clarke County to consider the murder and other charges against Jose Ibarra for the killing of Laken Hope Riley is impossible, attorneys John Donnelly and Kaitlyn Beck said in a court filing. A shackled Ibarra appeared in court on Friday dressed in a button-front shirt and slacks.

Superior Court Judge H. Patrick Haggard said during the brief hearing that he was planning to start jury selection on Nov. 13 and then proceed with the trial the following week.

He gave prosecutors 10 days to respond to the request for a change of venue, which was filed on Thursday.

In the filing, Donnelly and Beck noted Riley was killed on the campus of the University of Georgia, a “prominent institution” in Athens, and said the case had received extensive media coverage locally.


A 2013 Georgia court decision found that a change of venue is proper in cases where media coverage is “‘unduly extensive, factually incorrect, inflammatory, or reflective of an atmosphere of hostility,”‘ according to the filing.

A grand jury in early May returned an indictment charging Ibarra, 26, with murder, aggravated assault, kidnapping and other crimes in the February killing of Riley. The 10-count indictment accuses him of hitting the 22-year-old Augusta University College of Nursing student in the head, asphyxiating her and pulling up her clothing with the intent to rape her.


He pleaded not guilty in May.

The killing immediately became a flashpoint in the national debate over immigration because Ibarra, who is from Venezuela, entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 and was allowed to stay to pursue his immigration case. Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, blamed Riley’s death on President Joe Biden and his border policies.


Riley’s body was found Feb. 22 near running trails after a friend told police she had not returned from a morning run, and police have said her killing appeared to be a random attack. Ibarra was arrested the next day and has been held in the Athens-Clarke County Jail without bond since then.

The indictment charges Ibarra with one count of malice murder, three counts of felony murder and one count each of kidnapping, aggravated assault, aggravated battery, hindering an emergency telephone call, tampering with evidence and peeping Tom.

The indictment says that on the day of Riley’s killing, Ibarra had peered into the window of an apartment in a university housing building, which is the basis for the peeping Tom charge.

In a separate filing on Thursday, Ibarra’s attorneys said that charge should be tried separately from the others because the alleged victim is different.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
24,972
8,971
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Two stories about a Father & Son duo. On Wednesday, law enforcement announced that they had thwarted what RCMP Supt. James Parr described a targeted attack in its “advanced” stages.

Father and son Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi, 62, and his son, Mostafa Eldidi, 26, were arrested in their third-floor room at a nondescript Richmond Hill hotel last weekend.
In the video, the man is wearing an orange jumpsuit. It is the favoured uniform that ISIS uses for their prisoners. The man is dangling from a pole in a desert somewhere.

Lots of people were killed by ISIS, the Islamic State, in front of high-definition cameras, wearing orange jumpsuits. In many of the ISIS snuff films — like the ones showing the beheading of American freelance journalist James Foley, Time magazine writer Steven Sotloff and British aid worker Alan Henning — there would be some reference to a news event, to establish its date. The location would often be somewhere in the desert.

The victims, kneeling and wearing the Guantanamo-style coveralls, would read a statement given to them by ISIS. Masked ISIS terrorists would always be standing behind the men. One of the terrorists would typically make some statement, too, railing against Israel and America and the West. Then, the terrorists would grab the victim, holding him down, while another terrorist would behead him, using a long-bladed knife. All on camera.

In the June 2015 ISIS video obtained by the authorities and shared this week by great reporters at Global News, Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi, 62, is allegedly seen holding a sword — which he then uses to hack away at the limbs of the man. We don’t know if the man is dead, but it seems likely.

Then…then they come to Canada and live for about a decade…before plotting a terrorist attack on Canadian soil…targeting the city’s Jewish community ‘cuz Jews (?) & why are they here? ‘Cuz they were born here & are Canadian citizens? Something like that?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Taxslave2

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
3,375
2,028
113
Two stories about a Father & Son duo. On Wednesday, law enforcement announced that they had thwarted what RCMP Supt. James Parr described a targeted attack in its “advanced” stages.

Father and son Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi, 62, and his son, Mostafa Eldidi, 26, were arrested in their third-floor room at a nondescript Richmond Hill hotel last weekend.
In the video, the man is wearing an orange jumpsuit. It is the favoured uniform that ISIS uses for their prisoners. The man is dangling from a pole in a desert somewhere.

Lots of people were killed by ISIS, the Islamic State, in front of high-definition cameras, wearing orange jumpsuits. In many of the ISIS snuff films — like the ones showing the beheading of American freelance journalist James Foley, Time magazine writer Steven Sotloff and British aid worker Alan Henning — there would be some reference to a news event, to establish its date. The location would often be somewhere in the desert.

The victims, kneeling and wearing the Guantanamo-style coveralls, would read a statement given to them by ISIS. Masked ISIS terrorists would always be standing behind the men. One of the terrorists would typically make some statement, too, railing against Israel and America and the West. Then, the terrorists would grab the victim, holding him down, while another terrorist would behead him, using a long-bladed knife. All on camera.

In the June 2015 ISIS video obtained by the authorities and shared this week by great reporters at Global News, Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi, 62, is allegedly seen holding a sword — which he then uses to hack away at the limbs of the man. We don’t know if the man is dead, but it seems likely.

Then…then they come to Canada and live for about a decade…before plotting a terrorist attack on Canadian soil…targeting the city’s Jewish community ‘cuz Jews (?) & why are they here? ‘Cuz they were born here & are Canadian citizens? Something like that?
Probably not born here, at least the father. They come here and get Canadian citizenship as a place to bug out to, then go play terrorist wherever they came from, knowing our useless government will bail them out.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
111,724
12,281
113
Low Earth Orbit
Probably not born here, at least the father. They come here and get Canadian citizenship as a place to bug out to, then go play terrorist wherever they came from, knowing our useless government will bail them out.
Muzzies get fucked up and paranoid on meth, crack and fenty too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
57,337
7,939
113
Washington DC
Probably not born here, at least the father. They come here and get Canadian citizenship as a place to bug out to, then go play terrorist wherever they came from, knowing our useless government will bail them out.
Of course not. No true, upstanding Son of The Great White North would do such a heinous thing!